A few days ago, I was chatting with some friends who are deeply involved in the DeFi space, and the topic shifted to oracles. One of them mentioned their development of a prediction market project, which recently made an interesting technical choice — switching all their existing oracle solutions to a new subscription-based service.



I was curious at the time, since leading oracle solutions have accumulated years of ecosystem development, with a huge market cap, comprehensive documentation, and toolchains. Why switch?

He ran some numbers for me, and that’s when I understood. Their prediction market mainly deals with sports data, like NBA and American football, where scores update every minute. Using the traditional pay-per-call model, just pulling data for a single game costs hundreds of dollars. Over a season, these costs become unsustainable.

But the new solution is completely different. They offer an Oracle-as-a-Service subscription plan with three tiers: Basic, Pro, and Premium. Once subscribed, developers can make unlimited calls without worrying about API costs each time. This is a lifesaver for applications with high-frequency data needs. To put it simply, it’s like having a gym membership — with the card in hand, you can go whenever you want, without paying each time you swipe the door.

More importantly, the sports data module launched with this service covers a wide range of mainstream sports — NBA, NFL, soccer, boxing, rugby, badminton — all supported, with near real-time push updates, latency controlled within seconds. For prediction markets that require extremely timely data, this is crucial.

Listening to him, I finally understood why this model can attract developers. It’s not just about saving money; it fundamentally changes the cost structure — from uncertain, usage-based costs to predictable fixed costs. This is a big help for startup teams’ financial planning.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GreenCandleCollectorvip
· 10h ago
Hmm, this subscription model is indeed impressive, turning API costs from variable to fixed, which is very friendly to startup teams. Switching from pay-as-you-go to monthly packages greatly improves cost control, and financial budgeting can finally rest easy. Sports data with second-level latency and unlimited calls—applications like market prediction that rely heavily on data definitely need an upgrade. But it depends on how stable it is; the saying "you get what you pay for" still holds true in crypto. Why not adopt a hybrid approach? Use premium oracles for insurance on some parts, and save money with the new方案 on others.
View OriginalReply0
ProbablyNothingvip
· 18h ago
Haha, finally someone is criticizing the pay-as-you-go money-grabbing model of oracles. A few hundred dollars for a single match is really outrageous. The subscription model is indeed a clever idea, but it still depends on whose data is more stable and reliable. But to be honest, integrating sports event data isn't easy, can you really guarantee second-level latency?
View OriginalReply0
AlwaysQuestioningvip
· 18h ago
I think this is what an Oracle should look like. Finally, someone is starting to cut costs.
View OriginalReply0
NeonCollectorvip
· 18h ago
Wow, the subscription-based oracle is truly brilliant, with a closed-loop cost-saving logic. From pay-as-you-go to monthly plans, the financial pressure on startup teams instantly becomes much easier. Seconds-level latency + unlimited calls, the spring of high-frequency data applications has really arrived. Leading oracles are still relying on old methods; this guy's choice is obviously smarter. But the key is how stable this new service is; it would be awkward if it drops the ball later.
View OriginalReply0
SleepyArbCatvip
· 18h ago
Oops, finally saving on Gas fees... I like this mode Wait, is the subscription model really cost-effective? Let's do the math, brother The subscription mode is just like traditional cloud services, nothing new... but it’s definitely more comfortable than pay-per-use Millisecond-level latency? Sports data is okay, much more reliable than Chainlink The nightmare of high-frequency calls is finally over, truly This fixed-cost model is too friendly to small teams... I’m convinced Oracles should have been done this way from the start, someone should have done it earlier Spending hundreds of dollars to pull off a game data is ridiculous, no wonder they’re switching Subscriptions still carry risks, they need to be reliable This logic is clear, just like the cost optimization approach I found in cross-chain arbitrage
View OriginalReply0
LowCapGemHuntervip
· 18h ago
The subscription model is indeed cost-effective, but I'm worried about price increases later on.
View OriginalReply0
ser_ngmivip
· 18h ago
Woke up, it turns out that the oracle industry is also starting to compete internally --- Subscription models really killed pay-as-you-go, but the real question is how long this new service can stay stable --- So sports data prediction oracles can still be played like this, I didn't think of that --- Monthly card mode is really friendly to startup teams, just worried about a quiet price hike later --- Millisecond-level latency is indeed enough for gamblers, but how to ensure data accuracy? --- Another "disruptive"方案, let's wait and see how long it can survive --- I just want to know how the TVL of this new service compares to the current major oracles --- It was about time to do this, top oracles are eating too much --- After chatting for a while, it's still about making money from startup teams, same套路 --- Unlimited calls are really attractive, but I'm more worried about service stability
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)