2025-12-26 17:29:49

I only really started working on this account in March 2025. To be honest, in the beginning, I was just messing around, and it wasn't until July and August that I started writing long articles seriously. I had done a few rounds of data analysis in April and May, but then I basically left it alone. Since then, updates have been based on my mood and workload, with no clear pattern.

Recently, I want to seriously assess the quality of my account and its data performance. Several content creators in the group have shared their data, and I’ve also benchmarked against them. Taking this opportunity to review the growth trajectory of the account and the effectiveness of the content, to see which directions are worth further exploration.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ChainWallflower

· 18h ago

Only started to get serious after half a year of slacking off, I totally get this rhythm, haha Initially just following the trend, only woke up in July? Can the data look good? Using the peer group's data as a benchmark is a good move, but it depends on how they persist The real hustle is actually just these few months, it's not too late to reflect now Keep digging, don't slack off again, buddy

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsPolice

· 18h ago

Hey, I only started taking things seriously after half a year of slackening off, I'm very familiar with this rhythm... Updating according to mood is indeed a killer; it's no wonder the data looks good. Compare yourself with the guys in the group; only then can you see where you are lacking. It took half a year to find the direction, and the potential for growth moving forward is actually quite large. Long articles really consume more data than fragmented content; this should be very obvious in terms of experience. After organizing, remember to also sort out the reverse aspects—don't just look at the growth. Mood updates vs. system updates, the difference is huge.

View OriginalReply0

GamefiHarvester

· 18h ago

Fooling around for half a year before waking up, maybe it's a bit late, brother. --- This rhythm, it seems most people are like this, initially just playing around casually. --- Compare the data, and you'll see clearly which content really resonates with people. --- Starting to wake up vigorously in July? That shows the previous time was indeed a waste. --- This set of mood updates will eventually backfire; it's better to have a plan. --- Deeply exploring the direction is crucial; don't end up discovering everything is off track. --- Benchmarking in the group is quite interesting and also shows how big the gap is. --- Carefully reviewing everything might help find a breakthrough. --- What exactly changed from fooling around to being serious? --- Not many accounts can truly match quality and data, right?

View OriginalReply0

ApeWithAPlan

· 18h ago

I've only started to get serious after a few months of slacking off. I totally get this rhythm. Honestly, comparing data can sometimes be pretty discouraging. Keep going, bro. With less initial investment, the output was also less. Now that you're serious, the results should become visible. Keep writing, and as the content quality improves, naturally people will watch. Hearing you say that, it feels like you've just found your rhythm recently. Not bad, not bad.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeVictim

· 18h ago

Started working on it only in July, this pace is really lazy mode haha Data benchmarking is here, are we about to start competing? The mood update account now needs to look at the data, the change is quite quick The group is getting competitive, following the trend to see growth trajectory Initially all fluff, only later did there be substance, this is the routine operation of content accounts When did it start updating regularly? Seems like it's still based on mood

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-6bc33122

· 18h ago

Slacking off for three months before starting to get serious, I’m familiar with this rhythm haha Hey, this is probably the usual operation for Web3 folks, initial trial and error are indeed necessary Really, just compare the data and you'll see clearly, don’t work in a vacuum The mood update thing needs to be improved, or you'll easily lose followers It’s a bit late to start making an effort in July and August, let’s see how the data performs over these two months Creating content needs to be consistent, otherwise the algorithm will never notice you Long articles do respond more directly than short comments, has the quality improved? If you want to dig deeper, first look at which content has the highest retention rate With this pace, you need to chase hard, no more slacking off Before benchmarking others, make sure you understand your own content system clearly

View OriginalReply0