In 2024, zero-knowledge proofs (ZKP) have shifted from a geek topic to mainstream in the crypto world. According to the latest data, the total market capitalization of 40 ZK projects has surpassed $21 billion, with leading project Zcash (ZEC) alone contributing $7.26 billion. Why has ZKP suddenly become so popular? Simply put: it solves two of the biggest ultimate challenges in blockchain—privacy and scalability.
Imagine you can prove you know a secret without ever revealing it. That’s the magic of ZKP. Compared to traditional finance “I show my ID to prove I am me,” ZKP allows you to “prove mathematically” without exposing any personal information. How powerful is this technology? It’s enough to make the entire blockchain ecosystem rethink security architecture.
The Three Core Principles of ZKP
The reason ZKP can become the hottest tech concept in 2024 is that it satisfies the three impossible triangles of blockchain:
Integrity – If you truly know the secret, the verifier will be 100% convinced, with no chance of luck-based passing.
Reliability – If you don’t know the secret at all, even the smartest fraudster can’t pass (unless the probability is negligibly low).
Zero Leakage – Throughout the verification process, the verifier learns nothing extra, only that you are correct.
This mechanism has applications with instant impact in scenarios like DeFi, privacy coins, voting systems, and cross-chain interactions. For example, in electronic voting, you can prove “I voted” but hide “who I voted for”; in enterprise supply chains, you can prove “the product meets environmental standards” without revealing the supplier list.
The Most Promising ZK Projects in 2024
Zcash (ZEC): The Pioneer of Privacy Coins
With a market cap of $7.26 billion, Zcash is the birthplace of ZK concepts. Since its inception in 2016, it has used zk-SNARKs technology to cloak transactions—hiding sender, receiver, and amount.
This isn’t just simple coin mixing. Zcash’s “shielded transactions” can completely break blockchain transparency, making transactions as private as cash. The recent introduction of Halo technology is a major breakthrough: eliminating doxxing risks (which previously required “trusted setup” with potential backdoors), making the system more secure.
However, the challenge is clear: because of its strong privacy features, regulators worldwide are wary of Zcash. Some exchanges and wallets have delisted or restricted ZEC trading—an inevitable fate for privacy coins.
Mina Protocol (MINA): Circulating Market Cap $97.59M
While Zcash aims for transaction privacy, Mina’s goal is more radical—allow anyone to verify the entire blockchain on a mobile phone. It sounds like a fantasy, but they’ve achieved it with zk-SNARKs: the entire network is compressed to just 22KB.
The core idea is: traditional nodes need to download gigabytes of historical data to verify the chain. Mina does the opposite—using “self-updating” zero-knowledge proofs for each new block, keeping the size at 22KB forever. The result? Ordinary users can run full nodes directly on their phones without trusting any intermediaries.
The risk? The high complexity of zk-SNARKs could become a nightmare for long-term maintenance. But if successful, Mina could democratize blockchain like never before.
Loopring (LRC): Benchmark for DEX Scalability
With a circulating market cap of $68.28 million, Loopring uses zk-Rollups to boost DEX throughput to over 2000 TPS while reducing Gas fees by 90%. This isn’t just tech show-off; it’s real product deployment.
Loopring’s trick is “batch processing”—bundling hundreds of transactions per second into a single ZK proof, then uploading it to the main chain for verification. Since only one proof needs validation instead of hundreds of transactions, Gas costs drop sharply.
Architecturally, there’s also a clever design called “ring miners”: nodes responsible for matching, verifying, and executing trade orders, earning profits from fees or spreads. This creates a self-driven incentive system, rather than relying on a centralized team.
Immutable X (IMX): The High-Speed Train for NFT Trading
With a market cap of $192.86 million, IMX, in partnership with StarkWare, has built a dedicated track for gaming and NFT. Using zk-Rollups technology, it achieves instant confirmation and zero Gas fees—crucial for NFT trading.
On traditional Ethereum, NFT transactions often cost tens of dollars in Gas and can take 15 seconds or more. IMX jumps straight to zero fees and instant confirmation, a dream for Web3 game developers. The downside? If your NFT or app isn’t in the IMX ecosystem, migration costs can be high.
dYdX (DYDX): The Invisible Fortress of Leverage Trading
After migrating from Ethereum L2 to its own Cosmos-based chain, dYdX uses zk-STARKs (no trusted setup needed) to efficiently verify perpetual contract trading. The latest v4.0 introduces new risk management tools like “reduce-only orders” and sub-account fund limits.
dYdX’s choice is interesting: building an independent chain instead of choosing an existing L2. This gives full customization but also means they bear all the responsibility for network security.
Worldcoin (WLD): ZK in Biometric Applications
With a market cap of $1.27 billion, Worldcoin applies ZK to identity verification. Users scan their irises with the “Orb” device to generate a World ID, then use zk-SNARKs to prove “I am the real person” without revealing iris data.
This design is innovative but controversial. The security and privacy of biometric data, regulatory concerns across countries, are long-term issues. The technology is sound, but the trust chain is long.
Polygon Hermez, Horizen, Aleph Zero, etc.: A Blooming Ecosystem
Polygon Hermez reduces Ethereum Gas by 90% using ZK-Rollups
Horizen (ZEN), a fork of Zcash, builds a complete privacy ecosystem with sidechains
Aleph Zero (AZERO) employs hybrid consensus (PoS+DAG) + Liminal privacy layer for enterprise applications
Marlin (POND) takes a different approach: using ZKP + TEE to verify off-chain computations, enabling blockchain to handle complex AI reasoning
The Real Challenges in the ZK Track
Behind the technological halo, ZK projects face deadly challenges:
Implementation difficulty – ZKP involves deep cryptography. A parameter error or a bug in the code can shatter the entire security promise.
High computational costs – Generating ZK proofs requires substantial resources. While verification is cheap, proof generation can hinder large-scale adoption.
Regulatory sword hanging – ZK’s privacy features are a double-edged sword for financial regulation. From delisting privacy coins to government scrutiny, compliance remains a long-term hurdle.
Emerging tech risks – zk-SNARKs require trusted setup (though Halo and others are improving). zk-STARKs are trustless but more verification-intensive. The tech route is still evolving.
The Future: 2025 and Beyond — The Endgame of ZK
The most imaginative vision is a “cross-chain privacy layer”—enabling private interactions across different blockchains. Once realized, ZKP would no longer be just a single-chain tech but a foundational part of Web3 infrastructure.
Another direction is “on-chain ZK applications.” Currently, ZK mainly focuses on scalability and privacy, but in theory, any application requiring verification without revealing details—like machine learning inference or medical data validation—could leverage ZK. The application space is almost limitless.
Most importantly, user experience must improve—most current ZK apps are black boxes for ordinary users. The future winners will be those projects that make ZKP transparent and foolproof.
Underlying Logic
The 2024 ZK boom is no accident. Privacy needs + scalability pressure + regulatory push—these three forces have propelled zero-knowledge proofs from theory to practice. From Zcash’s veteran status to Mina’s radical innovation, to application-oriented solutions like Polygon Hermez and Immutable X, the ZK track has formed a complete technical lineage.
The question is: how many of these projects will survive the next bull market? The answer depends on two key factors: whether they can solve scalability issues, and whether they can find room to operate within regulatory frameworks.
ZKP itself is perfect mathematics, but in the real world, it faces engineering, economic, and legal tests. That’s why the ZK hype in 2024 is both exciting and risky.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
ZK Encryption Projects 2024 Panorama: The Double-Edged Sword of Privacy and Scalability
In 2024, zero-knowledge proofs (ZKP) have shifted from a geek topic to mainstream in the crypto world. According to the latest data, the total market capitalization of 40 ZK projects has surpassed $21 billion, with leading project Zcash (ZEC) alone contributing $7.26 billion. Why has ZKP suddenly become so popular? Simply put: it solves two of the biggest ultimate challenges in blockchain—privacy and scalability.
Imagine you can prove you know a secret without ever revealing it. That’s the magic of ZKP. Compared to traditional finance “I show my ID to prove I am me,” ZKP allows you to “prove mathematically” without exposing any personal information. How powerful is this technology? It’s enough to make the entire blockchain ecosystem rethink security architecture.
The Three Core Principles of ZKP
The reason ZKP can become the hottest tech concept in 2024 is that it satisfies the three impossible triangles of blockchain:
Integrity – If you truly know the secret, the verifier will be 100% convinced, with no chance of luck-based passing.
Reliability – If you don’t know the secret at all, even the smartest fraudster can’t pass (unless the probability is negligibly low).
Zero Leakage – Throughout the verification process, the verifier learns nothing extra, only that you are correct.
This mechanism has applications with instant impact in scenarios like DeFi, privacy coins, voting systems, and cross-chain interactions. For example, in electronic voting, you can prove “I voted” but hide “who I voted for”; in enterprise supply chains, you can prove “the product meets environmental standards” without revealing the supplier list.
The Most Promising ZK Projects in 2024
Zcash (ZEC): The Pioneer of Privacy Coins
With a market cap of $7.26 billion, Zcash is the birthplace of ZK concepts. Since its inception in 2016, it has used zk-SNARKs technology to cloak transactions—hiding sender, receiver, and amount.
This isn’t just simple coin mixing. Zcash’s “shielded transactions” can completely break blockchain transparency, making transactions as private as cash. The recent introduction of Halo technology is a major breakthrough: eliminating doxxing risks (which previously required “trusted setup” with potential backdoors), making the system more secure.
However, the challenge is clear: because of its strong privacy features, regulators worldwide are wary of Zcash. Some exchanges and wallets have delisted or restricted ZEC trading—an inevitable fate for privacy coins.
Mina Protocol (MINA): Circulating Market Cap $97.59M
While Zcash aims for transaction privacy, Mina’s goal is more radical—allow anyone to verify the entire blockchain on a mobile phone. It sounds like a fantasy, but they’ve achieved it with zk-SNARKs: the entire network is compressed to just 22KB.
The core idea is: traditional nodes need to download gigabytes of historical data to verify the chain. Mina does the opposite—using “self-updating” zero-knowledge proofs for each new block, keeping the size at 22KB forever. The result? Ordinary users can run full nodes directly on their phones without trusting any intermediaries.
The risk? The high complexity of zk-SNARKs could become a nightmare for long-term maintenance. But if successful, Mina could democratize blockchain like never before.
Loopring (LRC): Benchmark for DEX Scalability
With a circulating market cap of $68.28 million, Loopring uses zk-Rollups to boost DEX throughput to over 2000 TPS while reducing Gas fees by 90%. This isn’t just tech show-off; it’s real product deployment.
Loopring’s trick is “batch processing”—bundling hundreds of transactions per second into a single ZK proof, then uploading it to the main chain for verification. Since only one proof needs validation instead of hundreds of transactions, Gas costs drop sharply.
Architecturally, there’s also a clever design called “ring miners”: nodes responsible for matching, verifying, and executing trade orders, earning profits from fees or spreads. This creates a self-driven incentive system, rather than relying on a centralized team.
Immutable X (IMX): The High-Speed Train for NFT Trading
With a market cap of $192.86 million, IMX, in partnership with StarkWare, has built a dedicated track for gaming and NFT. Using zk-Rollups technology, it achieves instant confirmation and zero Gas fees—crucial for NFT trading.
On traditional Ethereum, NFT transactions often cost tens of dollars in Gas and can take 15 seconds or more. IMX jumps straight to zero fees and instant confirmation, a dream for Web3 game developers. The downside? If your NFT or app isn’t in the IMX ecosystem, migration costs can be high.
dYdX (DYDX): The Invisible Fortress of Leverage Trading
After migrating from Ethereum L2 to its own Cosmos-based chain, dYdX uses zk-STARKs (no trusted setup needed) to efficiently verify perpetual contract trading. The latest v4.0 introduces new risk management tools like “reduce-only orders” and sub-account fund limits.
dYdX’s choice is interesting: building an independent chain instead of choosing an existing L2. This gives full customization but also means they bear all the responsibility for network security.
Worldcoin (WLD): ZK in Biometric Applications
With a market cap of $1.27 billion, Worldcoin applies ZK to identity verification. Users scan their irises with the “Orb” device to generate a World ID, then use zk-SNARKs to prove “I am the real person” without revealing iris data.
This design is innovative but controversial. The security and privacy of biometric data, regulatory concerns across countries, are long-term issues. The technology is sound, but the trust chain is long.
Polygon Hermez, Horizen, Aleph Zero, etc.: A Blooming Ecosystem
The Real Challenges in the ZK Track
Behind the technological halo, ZK projects face deadly challenges:
Implementation difficulty – ZKP involves deep cryptography. A parameter error or a bug in the code can shatter the entire security promise.
High computational costs – Generating ZK proofs requires substantial resources. While verification is cheap, proof generation can hinder large-scale adoption.
Regulatory sword hanging – ZK’s privacy features are a double-edged sword for financial regulation. From delisting privacy coins to government scrutiny, compliance remains a long-term hurdle.
Emerging tech risks – zk-SNARKs require trusted setup (though Halo and others are improving). zk-STARKs are trustless but more verification-intensive. The tech route is still evolving.
The Future: 2025 and Beyond — The Endgame of ZK
The most imaginative vision is a “cross-chain privacy layer”—enabling private interactions across different blockchains. Once realized, ZKP would no longer be just a single-chain tech but a foundational part of Web3 infrastructure.
Another direction is “on-chain ZK applications.” Currently, ZK mainly focuses on scalability and privacy, but in theory, any application requiring verification without revealing details—like machine learning inference or medical data validation—could leverage ZK. The application space is almost limitless.
Most importantly, user experience must improve—most current ZK apps are black boxes for ordinary users. The future winners will be those projects that make ZKP transparent and foolproof.
Underlying Logic
The 2024 ZK boom is no accident. Privacy needs + scalability pressure + regulatory push—these three forces have propelled zero-knowledge proofs from theory to practice. From Zcash’s veteran status to Mina’s radical innovation, to application-oriented solutions like Polygon Hermez and Immutable X, the ZK track has formed a complete technical lineage.
The question is: how many of these projects will survive the next bull market? The answer depends on two key factors: whether they can solve scalability issues, and whether they can find room to operate within regulatory frameworks.
ZKP itself is perfect mathematics, but in the real world, it faces engineering, economic, and legal tests. That’s why the ZK hype in 2024 is both exciting and risky.