Polkadot has fallen from a high of $55 to less than $2 now. What is the story behind this decline? The opening price was already $2, and now it has dropped to $1.7, a geometric shrinkage that inevitably prompts reflection. Some point out that there are issues with Polkadot's Grant mechanism—funds officially awarded can be directly reclaimed by external decision-making. Such operational practices have sparked considerable discussion. Even more interesting is that the project uses open-source code but faces official constraints and threats. Is this management logic reasonable? It has become a focal point for the community. From price performance to ecosystem governance, from incentive mechanisms to code usage rights, DOT's trajectory and the accompanying controversies are worth paying attention to. The market votes with its feet, and numbers speak for themselves.

DOT6,34%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
WenAirdropvip
· 12-26 19:59
Speaking of DOT, this wave from 55 to 1.7 is truly outrageous... Can the Grant mechanism be arbitrarily revoked? That logic is a bit extreme.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainNewbievip
· 12-26 19:59
Damn, a drop from 55 to 1.7 is outrageous. If Grant can withdraw this freely, who would dare to build an ecosystem?
View OriginalReply0
gas_fee_therapistvip
· 12-26 19:59
Laughing out loud, the Grant mechanism is played almost like a bounced check.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)