The regulatory landscape of the US crypto industry is changing. Since the second year of the Trump administration, the long-standing jurisdictional disputes between the SEC and CFTC have gradually diminished, and the two agencies are beginning to form an unprecedented cooperative situation. A clearer "dual-track regulation" pattern is emerging.



**SEC's New Approach: Prioritizing Institutional Innovation**

Since taking office, SEC Chair Gary Gensler has changed many previous practices. In the review documents for the 2026 fiscal year, the SEC for the first time did not list cryptocurrencies as a separate risk category — this is not neglect, but a signal: digital assets are being regarded as a routine part of mature financial markets.

Gensler's promoted "Token Classification System" is particularly noteworthy. The core issue this system aims to address is: how should different types of digital assets be regulated? By establishing clear classification standards, it can help innovative projects avoid detours. Meanwhile, the SEC has approved various crypto ETFs for listing, and asset tokenization has also been included as a future regulatory focus. All these measures are aimed at one goal: providing the industry with a clear regulatory roadmap.

**CFTC's Acceleration: From Futures to Spot Markets**

The CFTC is also speeding up. The "Crypto Sprint" plan promoted by new Chairman Rostin Behnam is gradually being implemented, and legislative progress in Congress indicates that digital assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum, which have commodity attributes, are very likely to be explicitly included in the CFTC's regulatory scope for spot markets. This means the CFTC's role in the crypto market will be much more significant than in the past.

**What Are the Practical Impacts?**

By 2026, this division of labor—"SEC responsible for institutional innovation, CFTC leading market expansion"—may become the new normal. Compared to the previous passive regulation relying on enforcement, a rule-based, clearly divided approach will significantly reduce industry uncertainty. This is highly attractive to institutional investors — their biggest fear is unpredictable regulation. Once rules are clear, barriers to large-scale capital entry will be greatly lowered, and the overall compliant ecosystem of the crypto market can also grow accordingly.
BTC0,23%
ETH0,33%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
TradingNightmarevip
· 12-26 20:52
Wait, is the SEC no longer listing cryptocurrencies as a separate risk? Is this true? It feels like just a short while ago they were still closely monitoring it. Institutional funds are coming in, right? Then the coin price probably won't get hammered down again. The token classification system sounds good, but I'm still a bit confused about how exactly they categorize it.
View OriginalReply0
ContractTestervip
· 12-26 20:49
Finally, no more fighting each other. If these two departments can really cooperate well, I would believe it. But honestly, it's still about letting the institutions take over by easing restrictions.
View OriginalReply0
NFT_Therapyvip
· 12-26 20:45
Finally no longer guessing what regulation will be like all day long. This time, it's really a bit different. Institutional funds have been waiting for this moment for a long time. Once the rules are clear, the money will come naturally. If the token classification truly gets implemented, the entire industry landscape will have to change... Looking forward to how Atkins will handle it. Will it come true by 2026? Let's wait and see. Anyway, it's better than the previous chaotic approach. But to be honest, SEC no longer explicitly naming crypto individually sends a bit of a signal.
View OriginalReply0
Frontrunnervip
· 12-26 20:39
Dual-track regulation taking shape? To put it simply, it still depends on enforcement. We've seen too many empty talks on paper.
View OriginalReply0
TokenTaxonomistvip
· 12-26 20:39
per my analysis, this "dual-track" framework is taxonomically sound but let me actually check the legislative calendar here... statistically speaking, institutional capital flows follow regulatory clarity with a 6-month lag, so 2026 timeline seems optimistic ngl. the token phylogenetics are finally evolving past that evolutionary dead-end we saw pre-2024.
Reply0
SatoshiNotNakamotovip
· 12-26 20:33
It's finally no longer a tangled mess. The SEC and CFTC at least need to clarify who oversees whom... The previous damn uncertainty really scared away a large number of institutions.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)