A silent shift is taking place in the money market. The Federal Reserve's recent move—removing the cap on the $500 billion repurchase agreement facility—seems like a technical adjustment, but in fact, it is an early defensive measure against liquidity risks.



This is not a simple policy tweak. Behind Powell's team’s actions lies an anticipation of deeper financial risks. Restarting balance sheet expansion, large-scale purchases of short-term Treasury bills, lifting the cap on standing repo facilities—all these measures point to the same issue: the liquidity in the U.S. banking system is undergoing a subtle yet dangerous transformation.

From the most direct price signals, the cost of funds in the overnight repo market has clearly risen. The SOFR-OIS spread has widened significantly, indicating that market expectations for funding costs are increasing. On the quantitative side, signals are also being sent—reverse repo tools are nearing exhaustion, and the frequency of calls on standing repo facilities is increasing. These indicators together paint a picture of gradually mounting liquidity pressure in the money market.

Why is the Fed acting now? Because they are well aware of the lessons from the 2019 "cash crunch." Back then, the Fed underestimated the banking system’s actual demand for reserves, resulting in overnight repo rates soaring above 10%, catching the entire market off guard.

Today’s situation is even more complex. As balance sheet reduction continues, excess cash reserves in the banking system have shrunk significantly. This means the market’s resilience to funding fluctuations is weakening, and any external shock could trigger a more intense reaction. As reserves transition from "extremely ample" to "adequate" and even to "structurally tight," the hidden risks have been noticed by the Fed.

This move is less about responding to a crisis and more about preemptively plugging a potential trillion-dollar gap before a crisis actually erupts. The Fed is sending a clear message to the market: we see the risks clearly and are prepared.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ApeEscapeArtistvip
· 16h ago
Another wave of proactive planning is here. Powell's move is quite strategic. The 2019 liquidity crunch really scared them, and now they are afraid it will happen again. So they decided to tear down the ceiling altogether. It feels like the banking system's days are getting tougher and tougher. The shrinking of reserves is something to watch closely. The Federal Reserve stepping in to inject liquidity now indicates that risks are indeed accumulating, and it's not just a simple fine-tuning.
View OriginalReply0
FrogInTheWellvip
· 16h ago
Here we go again. The Federal Reserve's so-called "preemptive defense" rhetoric, in plain terms, is just fear of another embarrassing situation like 2019. Reverse repurchase agreements are almost gone, and SOFR is soaring... Only now do we realize, why didn't we act earlier? The removal of the 500 billion cap sounds impressive, but if things really go out of control, it might be far more than just this amount.
View OriginalReply0
BuyHighSellLowvip
· 16h ago
Wait, isn't this just a replay of the 2019 farce? Powell is so quick this time, which clearly shows he's really scared.
View OriginalReply0
NotAFinancialAdvicevip
· 16h ago
They're starting to flood the market again. Powell is battling the nightmare from 2019.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropChaservip
· 16h ago
I understood that wave back in 2019. The Federal Reserve has truly learned its lesson this time. However, I still think the issue of reserve shrinking is a bit uncertain.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)