There's an interesting phenomenon. Every time the market declines, most people are thinking about cutting losses, but in some project communities, they are discussing technical details—like "zero-knowledge proof verification."
This contrast is worth pondering. When panic engulfs the entire market, what are the real brains still working on? They are still improving the underlying infrastructure.
Take a recent technical upgrade as an example. A leading Oracle project made a key improvement: shifting the trust model of on-chain data from "relying on the honesty of the majority participants" to "only trusting mathematical verification." It sounds abstract, but the actual effect is very straightforward—asset price data on Bitcoin's layer 2 network can achieve near-zero latency and is extremely difficult to manipulate artificially. This is becoming an indispensable infrastructure in the entire ecosystem.
Even more impressive is its token economic design. Most projects issue tokens with ongoing inflation pressure, but this project does the opposite—every time there is data call and verification, the system automatically burns some tokens. During market panic and frequent trading, this deflationary burning actually intensifies. It effectively turns cyclical risk into a long-term tightening mechanism.
Here's some data: during this wave of sharp decline, the project's developer activity increased by 40% against the trend. What does this indicate? Smart and capable teams are quietly laying out the core infrastructure for the next cycle under the cover of market panic. They are not primarily debating whether prices will rise or fall tomorrow, but how to "move" more traditional assets onto the blockchain.
Next time the market panics, try looking at it from a different angle. Seek out voices discussing technical iterations—those often hide real investment signals. When the tide recedes, you'll be able to see clearly who is swimming naked and who is quietly upgrading their competitiveness.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
FlashLoanLord
· 5h ago
Interesting, the real track is where people are still coding, not in the group shouting signals.
View OriginalReply0
ChainMemeDealer
· 18h ago
During times of panic, it's actually when you see people's true nature. Technical discussions can really reveal the truth.
View OriginalReply0
just_here_for_vibes
· 18h ago
Really, the more it drops, the more people are working on technology. That's the difference, right?
People who cut losses will always cut losses; builders will always be building.
A 40% increase in activity is impressive. The team that keeps working during market panic is the true asset.
The deflationary burning mechanism is indeed excellent. Cycle risks directly turn into tightening... Just thinking about it feels brilliant.
Don't pay attention to market noise. Find the community that discusses zero-knowledge proofs; they know what the future is.
View OriginalReply0
Ser_This_Is_A_Casino
· 18h ago
To be honest, most people are filled with panic at this moment and can't see what's really happening. Those who are still pondering zero-knowledge proofs are the ones truly playing chess.
Developer activity has increased by 40% against the trend? That's a signal, friends. The ones who quietly make big money in a bear market are always the smart ones.
The deflationary burning mechanism is quite solid, much more reliable than most projects' hype.
There's an interesting phenomenon. Every time the market declines, most people are thinking about cutting losses, but in some project communities, they are discussing technical details—like "zero-knowledge proof verification."
This contrast is worth pondering. When panic engulfs the entire market, what are the real brains still working on? They are still improving the underlying infrastructure.
Take a recent technical upgrade as an example. A leading Oracle project made a key improvement: shifting the trust model of on-chain data from "relying on the honesty of the majority participants" to "only trusting mathematical verification." It sounds abstract, but the actual effect is very straightforward—asset price data on Bitcoin's layer 2 network can achieve near-zero latency and is extremely difficult to manipulate artificially. This is becoming an indispensable infrastructure in the entire ecosystem.
Even more impressive is its token economic design. Most projects issue tokens with ongoing inflation pressure, but this project does the opposite—every time there is data call and verification, the system automatically burns some tokens. During market panic and frequent trading, this deflationary burning actually intensifies. It effectively turns cyclical risk into a long-term tightening mechanism.
Here's some data: during this wave of sharp decline, the project's developer activity increased by 40% against the trend. What does this indicate? Smart and capable teams are quietly laying out the core infrastructure for the next cycle under the cover of market panic. They are not primarily debating whether prices will rise or fall tomorrow, but how to "move" more traditional assets onto the blockchain.
Next time the market panics, try looking at it from a different angle. Seek out voices discussing technical iterations—those often hide real investment signals. When the tide recedes, you'll be able to see clearly who is swimming naked and who is quietly upgrading their competitiveness.