Fed Chairman Jerome Powell has privately communicated to close associates that he will not capitulate to Trump’s escalating demands for his removal, vowing to endure the mounting pressure campaign over his resistance to cutting interest rates. According to sources cited by BlockBeats on July 25, Powell privately made clear that his tenure extends beyond personal conviction—his role as Federal Reserve Chair symbolizes the institution’s institutional independence from political interference. Stepping down during this pressure would fundamentally compromise the Federal Reserve’s long-established autonomy from executive manipulation, a principle Powell considers his paramount duty to defend.
Powell’s Track Record and the Shift in Perception
Powell’s appointment by Trump in 2017 was built on his reputation as a principled, straight-shooting operator with bipartisan credibility. His tenure at the Federal Reserve, spanning more than a decade, established him as a rigorous, apolitical voice. During Trump’s first administration, this uncompromising approach was valued. However, that same quality—his refusal to bend on policy decisions—has now transformed into a political liability. Trump has grown increasingly frustrated with Powell’s unwillingness to accommodate demands for rate reductions, expressing his exasperation by saying, ‘It’s like talking to a chair, there’s no response.’
The Escalation: From Budget Scrutiny to Direct Pressure
The White House’s strategy has evolved into what critics describe as a “boiling frog” campaign. Recent weeks have witnessed intensified focus on the Federal Reserve’s $2.5 billion renovation project, with officials investigating alleged cost overruns and signaling this as potential grounds for Powell’s termination. The pressure tactics intensified on Thursday when Trump personally toured the Federal Reserve’s construction site alongside Powell. During the visit, Trump made his position unmistakable, telling Powell directly, ‘I just want to see one thing happen, interest rates must come down.’ A senior Trump advisor characterized the broader pressure strategy starkly: ‘Either Powell jumps out, or he gets cooked.’
The Stakes for Federal Reserve Independence
At the core of this confrontation lies a fundamental question about institutional independence. Powell’s private resolve to maintain his post reflects his conviction that the Federal Reserve’s separation from political pressure is essential to sound monetary policy. Any capitulation—whether through resignation or policy concessions—would establish a precedent that threatens the Fed’s ability to act in the nation’s long-term economic interest rather than short-term political calculations.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Powell's Private Stand: Federal Reserve Chief Resists Trump's Escalating Pressure Campaign Over Rate Cuts
Fed Chairman Jerome Powell has privately communicated to close associates that he will not capitulate to Trump’s escalating demands for his removal, vowing to endure the mounting pressure campaign over his resistance to cutting interest rates. According to sources cited by BlockBeats on July 25, Powell privately made clear that his tenure extends beyond personal conviction—his role as Federal Reserve Chair symbolizes the institution’s institutional independence from political interference. Stepping down during this pressure would fundamentally compromise the Federal Reserve’s long-established autonomy from executive manipulation, a principle Powell considers his paramount duty to defend.
Powell’s Track Record and the Shift in Perception
Powell’s appointment by Trump in 2017 was built on his reputation as a principled, straight-shooting operator with bipartisan credibility. His tenure at the Federal Reserve, spanning more than a decade, established him as a rigorous, apolitical voice. During Trump’s first administration, this uncompromising approach was valued. However, that same quality—his refusal to bend on policy decisions—has now transformed into a political liability. Trump has grown increasingly frustrated with Powell’s unwillingness to accommodate demands for rate reductions, expressing his exasperation by saying, ‘It’s like talking to a chair, there’s no response.’
The Escalation: From Budget Scrutiny to Direct Pressure
The White House’s strategy has evolved into what critics describe as a “boiling frog” campaign. Recent weeks have witnessed intensified focus on the Federal Reserve’s $2.5 billion renovation project, with officials investigating alleged cost overruns and signaling this as potential grounds for Powell’s termination. The pressure tactics intensified on Thursday when Trump personally toured the Federal Reserve’s construction site alongside Powell. During the visit, Trump made his position unmistakable, telling Powell directly, ‘I just want to see one thing happen, interest rates must come down.’ A senior Trump advisor characterized the broader pressure strategy starkly: ‘Either Powell jumps out, or he gets cooked.’
The Stakes for Federal Reserve Independence
At the core of this confrontation lies a fundamental question about institutional independence. Powell’s private resolve to maintain his post reflects his conviction that the Federal Reserve’s separation from political pressure is essential to sound monetary policy. Any capitulation—whether through resignation or policy concessions—would establish a precedent that threatens the Fed’s ability to act in the nation’s long-term economic interest rather than short-term political calculations.