Some Web3 industry professionals have pointed out that the EU Digital Services Act's "zero tolerance" approach has issues. This idea of directly eliminating certain speech or products fundamentally reflects a suppression of diverse viewpoints. A truly free society should not focus on erasing controversial content — quite the opposite, it should allow different voices to coexist. A one-size-fits-all regulatory stance will ultimately stifle innovation and freedom of expression, which is especially detrimental to fields like blockchain that require open discussion.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PanicSeller
· 20h ago
The EU's "zero tolerance" approach is really outrageous. Are they just playing the delete game here? Without free discussion, what’s left to talk about in Web3 innovation...
View OriginalReply0
WenAirdrop
· 20h ago
The EU's zero-tolerance approach is truly suffocating, making it seem like they're managing elementary school students. Web3 is fundamentally about open discussion; a one-size-fits-all approach will kill it.
View OriginalReply0
AlgoAlchemist
· 20h ago
The EU's one-size-fits-all approach is really extreme. Do they have to eliminate all the "disobedient" ones to be satisfied? Blockchain relies on open discussion to survive, and doing it this way will only lead to failure sooner or later.
Some Web3 industry professionals have pointed out that the EU Digital Services Act's "zero tolerance" approach has issues. This idea of directly eliminating certain speech or products fundamentally reflects a suppression of diverse viewpoints. A truly free society should not focus on erasing controversial content — quite the opposite, it should allow different voices to coexist. A one-size-fits-all regulatory stance will ultimately stifle innovation and freedom of expression, which is especially detrimental to fields like blockchain that require open discussion.