Boaz Weinstein's Saba hedge fund is ramping up pressure on investors holding the London-listed fund managed by Baillie Gifford. The move centers on a push to remove certain board members before a crucial January shareholder vote. This escalation signals intensifying tensions over fund governance and strategic direction. Saba's aggressive stance suggests dissatisfaction with current board composition and operational decisions. With the vote looming, shareholders now face mounting pressure to side with either incumbent management or support the activist push for change. The outcome could reshape the fund's future trajectory and investment philosophy.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
24 Likes
Reward
24
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LostBetweenChains
· 12h ago
Saba is causing trouble again, this time targeting Baillie Gifford, a typical aggressive hedge fund tactic.
---
Wait, is Boaz Weinstein really going to move on the board? Will January's vote directly overturn the situation?
---
Honestly, such aggressive activities can sometimes bring about change, but Baillie Gifford is not to be underestimated.
---
It's another power struggle; investors are just sitting back and watching the show.
---
Interesting, will this succeed? It seems Saba's chances are not that great.
---
The impact of Weinstein's tactics on us retail investors is really limited; it's better to focus on our own positions.
---
Internal fund conflicts are escalating; these things happen all the time, and in the end, shareholders pay the price.
View OriginalReply0
SchroedingerAirdrop
· 20h ago
Here comes the routine of aggressive investors changing the lineup again, Saba's fire is burning well
Baillie Gifford's board is about to be criticized, it seems January's vote needs to be carefully considered
Retail investors are forced to pick sides again, this governance game is so annoying
I'm already tired of Boaz's tricks, who is the next target
Will the fund manager be pushed out? Investors are getting anxious
View OriginalReply0
QuorumVoter
· 2025-12-30 13:54
Another boardroom drama is unfolding, Saba is really getting anxious this time
The old tricks of dividing shares, same old soup, different bowl
Before the January vote, the pressure is at its peak, shareholders must choose sides
Can Baillie Gifford withstand this time... uncertain
Aggressive versus conservative, who should we bet on
That's why I don't touch funds, too many tricks involved
Can a single vote change the fate of a fund? Truly impressive
Saba is causing trouble again, let’s see how far this can go
Holders need to be more cautious this time
Boardroom chaos, investors caught in the crossfire
Master of disruption Weinstein, the tactics are getting more elaborate
Another power game, does this voting really mean anything?
Governance issues are so complex, no wonder fund returns are disappointing
View OriginalReply0
UncleWhale
· 2025-12-30 11:53
It's Saba causing trouble again; Boaz just can't sit still.
---
Baillie Gifford's board must be panicking; the real showdown is in January.
---
Activist investors always follow this pattern, but will it work this time...
---
It's already 2024, and they're still fighting governance battles in London. Isn't that a bit outdated?
---
Conflicts of interest. I'm optimistic about Saba this time. The management team is indeed a bit rigid right now.
---
Voting in January, betting that Boaz will win. This guy has never lost.
---
Baillie Gifford's LPs must be getting restless. This kind of public confrontation isn't a good sign.
View OriginalReply0
CafeMinor
· 2025-12-29 21:56
Boaz is causing trouble again, this time directly targeting the board of directors. The January vote will definitely be very lively.
View OriginalReply0
SmartContractPhobia
· 2025-12-29 21:51
Boaz is at it again, this time targeting Baillie Gifford... The board is about to undergo a shake-up, honestly probably all about the money.
---
On the eve of the January vote, the battle for governance rights is intensifying, let's see who can take the helm.
---
Saba's aggressive approach is nothing new in Web3; the power struggles in some DAOs are really nothing special.
---
It's another internal fight in traditional finance. Although our crypto world is chaotic, at least the rules are written on the chain.
---
Honestly, I'm a bit tired of this kind of boardroom tearing... The outcome is still the same group of people changing positions to continue the cut.
---
What is Baillie Gifford thinking? Such a large fund being forced into a corner by aggressive hedge funds.
---
Shareholders are about to pick sides, but the problem is neither side is very trustworthy.
View OriginalReply0
NotFinancialAdvice
· 2025-12-29 21:50
Saba is causing trouble again, this time to cut the board members? Old tricks, buddy.
---
Aggressive investors vs traditional fund managers, the real showdown in January. Who will win?
---
Baillie Gifford is probably going to be pushed to the limit this time; a public opinion battle has started.
---
Another drama of aggressive hedge funds versus veteran fund managers, investors become pawns.
---
Can the January vote really change anything? Or is it just another old game of capital?
---
Wait, what new direction is Saba pushing? Just to replace a few directors?
---
The power game in the capital markets never ends; who will be kicked out this time?
---
I can't understand the twists and turns of these fund managers, but aggressive capital always creates hot topics.
---
January might be a watershed moment; shareholders need to make a decision.
View OriginalReply0
RebaseVictim
· 2025-12-29 21:49
It's that guy Boaz causing trouble again, typical aggressive hedge fund style. The board reshuffle drama plays out every time—boring.
View OriginalReply0
FlatlineTrader
· 2025-12-29 21:42
Another battle for governance rights, Baillie Gifford is probably going to be unsettled this time.
View OriginalReply0
BlockBargainHunter
· 2025-12-29 21:37
It's that guy Boaz causing trouble again, this time targeting Baillie Gifford. The boardroom reshuffle routine is the same old story.
Saba's tactics are truly fierce. The voting in January should be quite a show.
Traditional funds are rigid; someone needs to stir things up.
Boaz Weinstein's Saba hedge fund is ramping up pressure on investors holding the London-listed fund managed by Baillie Gifford. The move centers on a push to remove certain board members before a crucial January shareholder vote. This escalation signals intensifying tensions over fund governance and strategic direction. Saba's aggressive stance suggests dissatisfaction with current board composition and operational decisions. With the vote looming, shareholders now face mounting pressure to side with either incumbent management or support the activist push for change. The outcome could reshape the fund's future trajectory and investment philosophy.