In the crypto world, you realize that things like technology, news, and mentality are actually虚的. The real killer is often a question most people haven't thought of — are the data your smart contract sees reliable?
Imagine this scenario: you spend a lot of money installing a world-class autonomous driving system, code flawless, capable of executing any command automatically. But what about the navigation system responsible for reporting traffic conditions? It might be deaf and blind, or even intentionally lead you off a cliff. This is the problem with oracles.
**Blockchains are inherently blind**
What’s the current price of Bitcoin? How much is your mortgage worth? Who won the last race? The blockchain doesn’t know any of this. It’s like a child locked inside a box, completely unfamiliar with the outside world. So it needs a "information broker" (that’s an oracle) to report intelligence.
The key question is: what if this information broker is late? What if it lies outright? Your position could be wrongly liquidated, the token you bought might be worthless, or even worse things could happen. That’s why in DeFi, GameFi, and NFT sectors, you often see people losing everything — on the surface, it’s market volatility, but in reality, it might all be due to this link.
**Someone wants to fix this loophole**
There’s a project called APRO, which aims to build a "bulletproof data fortress." Instead of copying data from a single source, it cross-verifies data from hundreds of sources worldwide. In other words, it makes lying economically unfeasible. Multiple data sources falsifying data at the same time? The cost is too high. This greatly reduces the risk of manipulation.
Of course, can this completely solve the problem? Not necessarily. But at least it recognizes this critical issue and takes targeted action — which already surpasses most projects.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-44a00d6c
· 6h ago
Oracles have long been a critical issue that should have been taken seriously. Many people have died because of a single point of failure in the data source without even realizing it.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoPhoenix
· 10h ago
I am a contrarian investor, not a bandwagon jumper. Seeing the risks of oracles being exposed actually makes me feel it's an opportunity. The bottom range is often shaped by misconceptions.
---
Another day of being taught by the market, but this wave of deep thinking about data sources feels like someone is truly beginning to cycle through the phases.
---
To be honest, I understand the idea behind APRO, but most people are still chasing hot topics and have no idea what they are actually betting on. Before rebirth, they all have to go through this period of ignorance.
---
Remember, the most important thing when losing money is to stay sober. Discussing oracle risks openly just shows that someone wants to truly fix this vulnerability, and that in itself is the beginning of faith.
---
I've heard the story of losing everything a hundred times, but the problem is everyone keeps making the same mistakes. Restoring value requires rebuilding this fundamental logic, no rush.
---
Multi-source cross-validation—this is just using economics to fight malicious behavior, at least more reliable than relying on a single oracle. Conservation of energy, risk being priced in—that's what a real market is.
View OriginalReply0
InfraVibes
· 10h ago
The oracle problem has indeed been underestimated, but honestly, whether APRO can really withstand the pressure depends on what happens next.
---
The analogy of blockchain blind men is spot on, but can we trust just because of multi-source verification? I'm actually more worried about collective malicious acts...
---
I've heard too many stories of losing everything; this time there's a new solution. Let's see how long it can last.
---
That's right, many people haven't realized they're actually being tricked at the data layer—it's too invisible.
---
I just want to know how APRO's data sources are chosen. Isn't this still a trust issue?
---
It's only suspicious if it's not economically viable; as long as the profit is big enough, people will do all kinds of bad things.
---
The oracle part has always been the Achilles' heel of DeFi. Finally, someone is discussing it properly.
View OriginalReply0
ChainWallflower
· 11h ago
Oracles are indeed a big pitfall; many people have died here without realizing it.
---
Haha, honestly, I'm just worried about data source issues, which feel more deadly than code bugs.
---
APRO's approach is pretty good; multi-source verification is definitely more reliable than a single price feed.
---
Wait, multiple data sources are costly to fake? Then what if someone colludes? Just thinking about it is terrifying.
---
Once you've been burned by liquidation, you'll never trust a single oracle again—blood and tears lesson.
---
The analogy that blockchains are blind is spot on; using oracles correctly is essentially betting on trust.
---
It seems this problem can't be completely solved; only relatively safer.
---
Really? Are all the DeFi collapses caused by oracles? I never thought about that before.
---
But the bad news is that every project claims their data is super secure, making it hard to tell who's genuine and who's fake.
In the crypto world, you realize that things like technology, news, and mentality are actually虚的. The real killer is often a question most people haven't thought of — are the data your smart contract sees reliable?
Imagine this scenario: you spend a lot of money installing a world-class autonomous driving system, code flawless, capable of executing any command automatically. But what about the navigation system responsible for reporting traffic conditions? It might be deaf and blind, or even intentionally lead you off a cliff. This is the problem with oracles.
**Blockchains are inherently blind**
What’s the current price of Bitcoin? How much is your mortgage worth? Who won the last race? The blockchain doesn’t know any of this. It’s like a child locked inside a box, completely unfamiliar with the outside world. So it needs a "information broker" (that’s an oracle) to report intelligence.
The key question is: what if this information broker is late? What if it lies outright? Your position could be wrongly liquidated, the token you bought might be worthless, or even worse things could happen. That’s why in DeFi, GameFi, and NFT sectors, you often see people losing everything — on the surface, it’s market volatility, but in reality, it might all be due to this link.
**Someone wants to fix this loophole**
There’s a project called APRO, which aims to build a "bulletproof data fortress." Instead of copying data from a single source, it cross-verifies data from hundreds of sources worldwide. In other words, it makes lying economically unfeasible. Multiple data sources falsifying data at the same time? The cost is too high. This greatly reduces the risk of manipulation.
Of course, can this completely solve the problem? Not necessarily. But at least it recognizes this critical issue and takes targeted action — which already surpasses most projects.