Ladies and gentlemen, I am the kind of analyst who always places a risk disclosure document in front of everyone when they are experiencing FOMO. Today’s topic is out: Can Ethereum break the 10,000 yuan mark by 2026? The atmosphere has already been hyped up enough; it seems that not going all in would be out of place.
But do you know? I have seen too many stories during these bull and bear cycles. Today, I want to sit you down and point to the fine print at the bottom of that shiny "invitation"—the line everyone sees but pretends not to see—and translate it for you. This is the real dividing line that determines whether you end up attending the feast in a tuxedo or losing all your clothes.
**Does the ceiling of growth really not exist?**
Network effects are not perpetual motion machines; this needs to be carefully unpacked. "Ethereum has the strongest development ecosystem and network effects, so its value must grow infinitely"—that sounds reasonable, but the danger lies precisely in the second half of that sentence you haven't finished reading.
Network effects do exist, but they come with two hidden "reflexivity" bottlenecks, which are crucial.
**The first bottleneck: value capture vs. value spillover tug-of-war**
Ethereum’s success has directly spawned a massive Layer 2 ecosystem. But this creates a dilemma: when the vast majority of transactions and active users move to Arbitrum, Optimism, Base, and other L2s, and ETH only becomes an asset used occasionally for cross-layer settlements, will its "fuel" demand be diluted? Is Ethereum’s ability to capture value from the entire ecosystem quietly weakening?
From another perspective, this is like a powerful central government facing vassals holding the economic lifeblood— the power structure has never changed, but the actual transfer of power happens every day.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
alpha_leaker
· 6h ago
Damn, the issue of L2 sharding is really a hidden risk, I never thought about it this way before...
By the way, is the expectation of ETH reaching ten thousand dollars really reliable? It feels similar to the voices back then shouting that BTC would break ten thousand.
Hey, his analogy of "feudal lords dividing land" is really brilliant; the transfer of power is indeed happening silently.
What are friends who are all-in thinking now? Does anyone really trust documents like the trust risk statement? Haha.
However, the value capture of protocol tokens on L2 seems to be much more aggressive than ETH.
It's called a thriving ecosystem in a nice way, but honestly, it's just digging your own grave.
View OriginalReply0
FloorPriceWatcher
· 6h ago
Hey wait, with L2 taking off, can ETH really still reach ten thousand yuan? Feels like this logic is a bit hard to hold up.
View OriginalReply0
CrashHotline
· 6h ago
Speaking of which, did ETH get sidelined as L2 took off? That logic really hits hard… Feels a bit like raising a son only to be surpassed by him in the end.
View OriginalReply0
CommunitySlacker
· 7h ago
Oh wow, you're so right. The L2 sharding issue really is quite concerning, and it feels like ETH has been somewhat drained of its sovereignty.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWatcher
· 7h ago
Hey, L2 takes off and ETH gets sidelined. I need to think this through... Could it be that Ethereum is just shooting itself in the foot?
View OriginalReply0
CafeMinor
· 7h ago
The reasoning is sound: L2 solutions have actually diluted the main chain’s value capture ability. From this perspective, it indeed hits many people's blind spots.
Ladies and gentlemen, I am the kind of analyst who always places a risk disclosure document in front of everyone when they are experiencing FOMO. Today’s topic is out: Can Ethereum break the 10,000 yuan mark by 2026? The atmosphere has already been hyped up enough; it seems that not going all in would be out of place.
But do you know? I have seen too many stories during these bull and bear cycles. Today, I want to sit you down and point to the fine print at the bottom of that shiny "invitation"—the line everyone sees but pretends not to see—and translate it for you. This is the real dividing line that determines whether you end up attending the feast in a tuxedo or losing all your clothes.
**Does the ceiling of growth really not exist?**
Network effects are not perpetual motion machines; this needs to be carefully unpacked. "Ethereum has the strongest development ecosystem and network effects, so its value must grow infinitely"—that sounds reasonable, but the danger lies precisely in the second half of that sentence you haven't finished reading.
Network effects do exist, but they come with two hidden "reflexivity" bottlenecks, which are crucial.
**The first bottleneck: value capture vs. value spillover tug-of-war**
Ethereum’s success has directly spawned a massive Layer 2 ecosystem. But this creates a dilemma: when the vast majority of transactions and active users move to Arbitrum, Optimism, Base, and other L2s, and ETH only becomes an asset used occasionally for cross-layer settlements, will its "fuel" demand be diluted? Is Ethereum’s ability to capture value from the entire ecosystem quietly weakening?
From another perspective, this is like a powerful central government facing vassals holding the economic lifeblood— the power structure has never changed, but the actual transfer of power happens every day.