When someone's deeply involved in cutting-edge projects, they often know way more than they can publicly share. You're boxed in by government agreements, regulatory frameworks, compliance requirements—it's not freedom, it's a calculated trade-off. If you're running a major aerospace company and you've got government contracts on the line, you play by their rules. The confidentiality clauses are real. It's not about secrecy for secrecy's sake; it's structural. You either maintain the partnerships that keep your operation alive, or you risk everything by going rogue. Most rational people would make the same call.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
governance_lurker
· 10h ago
ngl This is the dilemma that even the big players in Web3 have to face... knowing a lot of things but unable to articulate them.
That said, when it really matters, someone still has to dare to break the deadlock.
No matter how strong the cage of the system is, it can't stop the thirst for the truth...
The利益链条 (interest chain) is indeed fragile; pull one string and everything collapses.
So, freedom has never truly existed; it all depends on what you want.
View OriginalReply0
StakeOrRegret
· 01-02 18:00
This is reality. There is no absolute freedom; everything is a trade-off.
View OriginalReply0
GasOptimizer
· 01-02 17:55
In simple terms, it's a cost-benefit model: the cost of confidentiality agreements versus the probability of ongoing operations, with the data laid out here. On the government contract side, the penalties for breach plus reputation loss make hedging costs far higher than staying silent. Rational people choose the optimal solution.
View OriginalReply0
WalletsWatcher
· 01-02 17:54
To put it simply, this is a life locked by NDA. All the so-called innovation and cutting-edge developments are actually shackled by confidentiality agreements.
View OriginalReply0
consensus_whisperer
· 01-02 17:47
ngl this is the reality, who dares to oppose the government is really crazy
Basically, we're trapped. Is there any way out?
By the way, this logic applies to the crypto circle as well... as soon as regulation comes, you have to tuck your tail
Knowing too much is actually a burden, I believe
View OriginalReply0
ContractBugHunter
· 01-02 17:33
Damn, this is reality. The more you know, the more your mouth gets tighter.
When someone's deeply involved in cutting-edge projects, they often know way more than they can publicly share. You're boxed in by government agreements, regulatory frameworks, compliance requirements—it's not freedom, it's a calculated trade-off. If you're running a major aerospace company and you've got government contracts on the line, you play by their rules. The confidentiality clauses are real. It's not about secrecy for secrecy's sake; it's structural. You either maintain the partnerships that keep your operation alive, or you risk everything by going rogue. Most rational people would make the same call.