"Better to go with the trend for ten days than to hold on stubbornly for ten years"—I've heard this saying countless times, but I never truly understood it until I turned 10,000 yuan into 1 million in half a year. It's not because I’m good at predicting trends, but because I found a relatively "lazy" trading logic that avoids turning trend-following into gambling.
Many beginners in trend trading like to heavily leverage and rush in, adding to positions after losses, and doubling down after profits, resulting in increasing losses the more they operate. My approach is completely opposite: I only add to winning positions, set a fixed stop-loss, and never use leverage exceeding 3x.
**The first step is to split the principal structure.** Divide 10,000 yuan into two parts: 5,000 yuan into a safe account as a "ballast," which is absolutely not to be used; the remaining 5,000 yuan goes into the trading account. Even if the platform supports higher leverage, I only open positions at 10% of my capital—this way, the actual risk is similar to a conservative setup. I set the stop-loss at 2%, risking at most 100 yuan, which is just 1% of the total principal, far from the platform’s warning line, making me feel at ease.
**The second step is to focus only on certainty opportunities.** In May last year, a top asset fell for three consecutive days, with all panic indicators sounding off. I entered at the low point. After waiting three weeks, when the price hit my target, I closed the position, earning 35,000 yuan net. The essence of trend-following is actually to first solidify the principal, ensuring enough risk resistance before starting to "roll snowballs."
**The third step is to be even "lazier":** only use profits to roll over, without moving the principal. For example, a popular coin sideways for 38 days, with trading volume suddenly increasing by 30% and breaking previous highs, then I open a position with 2x leverage. When it rises 10%, I move the stop-loss to the cost price; another 10% increase, I add to the position with floating profits, and leverage never exceeds 3x. Under favorable conditions, after two cycles, the returns are already substantial.
I also adhere to four iron rules:
- Always set a stop-loss before opening a position, regardless of how tempting the trend is; - Take profit at 30% gain and move 20% of it into a safe account; - Immediately pause for 48 hours and review after two consecutive losses; - If monthly losses exceed 10% of the principal, stop trading for the month.
Now, market volatility is decreasing, and relying solely on stubborn holding makes it hard to achieve significant gains. In fact, using tools reasonably is not scary; what’s truly frightening is disorderly operation. As long as risks are well divided and only certain opportunities are pursued, being "a bit lazy" can actually help the account grow steadily.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SignatureLiquidator
· 01-04 04:00
I think the core is stop-loss; most people get wiped out because they don't use stop-losses.
Really, this method is like putting a tight band on yourself, making life more comfortable.
Turning 10,000 into 1 million sounds great, but the real value lies in the details of risk control.
Lazy crypto trading, to put it simply, discipline is more important than talent.
Adding positions on paper profits is a brilliant move; using other people's money removes the psychological pressure of making money.
View OriginalReply0
LightningClicker
· 01-03 21:44
Well said, that's exactly the logic—risk isolation is the key to long-term success.
I'm also using this split account approach, and the real key is that the "ballast" can't be touched.
Everyone's bragging about how they doubled their money, but no one mentions risk control? Your allocation ratio is indeed stable.
The part about adding positions on unrealized gains is the most accurate; beginners tend to do the opposite—losing money and still trying to add to their positions to turn things around.
3x leverage is the limit; anything beyond that is gambling, not trading.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrybaby
· 01-03 13:38
10,000 to 1,000,000? That number sounds a bit confusing to me, but I have to admit that the logic of 2% stop-loss and adding positions on floating profits is quite clear.
After losing two trades in a row, pausing for 48 hours is the real discipline, much more reliable than most people I've seen.
By the way, your "lazy trading method" core is to avoid greed. If I were to learn it... it would depend on whether this round of market conditions gives an opportunity.
3x leverage is indeed a balancing point, preventing the account from returning to zero overnight, I agree with that.
Only using floating profits to add positions, with the principal firmly unchanged—that's something I've always wanted to do but haven't truly executed.
Here's the question: When the market is sideways, how do you identify that "certain opportunity"? It feels like most of the time it's just a false breakout.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-e51e87c7
· 01-03 13:28
10,000 to a million, sounds great, but how can we guarantee its authenticity?
---
Adding to winning positions sounds good, but I'm afraid the market might turn around and crush it.
---
Setting a 2% stop-loss is indeed stable, but what about opportunity cost? Haven't you calculated that?
---
After two consecutive losses, pausing for 48 hours—this discipline is really hard for me to stick to.
---
I've adopted the idea of a safety account as a ballast, at least it makes me feel more at ease.
---
"Being a bit lazy can actually increase value," how can laziness and discipline coexist harmoniously in one person?
---
Can the profit of 35,000 from last May be reproduced now? The market is definitely different.
---
Triple leverage isn't considered excessive, but when the market rises, do you dare say you won't feel tempted?
---
Basically, it's still about betting on certainty, but what exactly is certainty?
---
Among the four iron rules, the hardest one is the market closure. Can you really achieve a 10% monthly return and just stop?
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWhisperer
· 01-03 13:27
10,000 to 1,000,000? Sounds pretty daunting, but that strict stop-loss rule is indeed reliable.
Losing 10% of the principal before closing the market, I agree with that. Many people just don't know when to shut up.
I've been using the strategy of adding positions on floating profits for a long time, just worried that beginners might not understand the real difference in execution ability.
Leverage within 3x is indeed not speculation; the key is whether you can keep your composure.
Honestly, risk diversification is more important than any technical analysis, but no one wants to hear that.
"Better to go with the trend for ten days than to hold on stubbornly for ten years"—I've heard this saying countless times, but I never truly understood it until I turned 10,000 yuan into 1 million in half a year. It's not because I’m good at predicting trends, but because I found a relatively "lazy" trading logic that avoids turning trend-following into gambling.
Many beginners in trend trading like to heavily leverage and rush in, adding to positions after losses, and doubling down after profits, resulting in increasing losses the more they operate. My approach is completely opposite: I only add to winning positions, set a fixed stop-loss, and never use leverage exceeding 3x.
**The first step is to split the principal structure.** Divide 10,000 yuan into two parts: 5,000 yuan into a safe account as a "ballast," which is absolutely not to be used; the remaining 5,000 yuan goes into the trading account. Even if the platform supports higher leverage, I only open positions at 10% of my capital—this way, the actual risk is similar to a conservative setup. I set the stop-loss at 2%, risking at most 100 yuan, which is just 1% of the total principal, far from the platform’s warning line, making me feel at ease.
**The second step is to focus only on certainty opportunities.** In May last year, a top asset fell for three consecutive days, with all panic indicators sounding off. I entered at the low point. After waiting three weeks, when the price hit my target, I closed the position, earning 35,000 yuan net. The essence of trend-following is actually to first solidify the principal, ensuring enough risk resistance before starting to "roll snowballs."
**The third step is to be even "lazier":** only use profits to roll over, without moving the principal. For example, a popular coin sideways for 38 days, with trading volume suddenly increasing by 30% and breaking previous highs, then I open a position with 2x leverage. When it rises 10%, I move the stop-loss to the cost price; another 10% increase, I add to the position with floating profits, and leverage never exceeds 3x. Under favorable conditions, after two cycles, the returns are already substantial.
I also adhere to four iron rules:
- Always set a stop-loss before opening a position, regardless of how tempting the trend is;
- Take profit at 30% gain and move 20% of it into a safe account;
- Immediately pause for 48 hours and review after two consecutive losses;
- If monthly losses exceed 10% of the principal, stop trading for the month.
Now, market volatility is decreasing, and relying solely on stubborn holding makes it hard to achieve significant gains. In fact, using tools reasonably is not scary; what’s truly frightening is disorderly operation. As long as risks are well divided and only certain opportunities are pursued, being "a bit lazy" can actually help the account grow steadily.