Recently, a friend came to me, not to show off profits, nor to ask about market levels.
"Honestly, I didn't get the direction wrong; I held my position for four days. But just when the market was about to explode, the funding rate wiped out a full 1,000 bucks of my capital. In the end, I was forced to liquidate, and only then did the market start moving."
I didn't comfort him, but simply told him a reality: you didn't lose to the market, but to rules you don't understand.
Many novice contract traders think this way—the core is to judge the right direction. But in reality, what truly determines the life or death of an account is often not that. I've seen too many traders who correctly judge the direction but end up getting liquidated inexplicably. The problem lies in these three points.
**Point 1: Continuous bleeding from the funding rate**
The sneakiest thing about the funding rate is— it doesn't kill you all at once, but gradually eats away at your principal.
It settles every 8 hours, with longs and shorts continuously paying each other. As long as you're holding a position, this money keeps flowing out. Many people don't realize that your market direction might be correct, but your profit progress can't keep up with the rate of funding costs. Especially during periods when the funding rate is consistently unfavorable, before the market even starts to move, your account’s health can already be severely drained.
A more rational approach is: avoid opening positions during times when the funding rate is obviously imbalanced. If you're holding medium- to long-term, try not to cross too many funding settlement periods. Ideally, stand on the side where the funding rate is favorable—let time pay you, rather than paying time.
**Point 2: Deadly misunderstanding of leverage multiples**
A common misconception is: 10x leverage = 10% drawdown space. But the logic for calculating liquidation price is far more complex.
With the same 10x leverage, if you're using isolated margin mode and have sufficient available balance, your drawdown space is more relaxed. But if you're using cross margin or have insufficient margin, even a slight market fluctuation can trigger liquidation. I've seen too many people who, due to a shallow understanding of this mechanism, hold onto what seems like a "safe" leverage ratio, only to be wiped out by extreme volatility.
**Point 3: Asymmetric risks of position size and timing**
In the futures market, the asymmetry between making and losing money is much greater than in spot trading. You might spend two weeks confirming a direction is correct, only to lose everything because you opened at the wrong time, used unreasonable leverage, or didn't consider funding costs.
True experts are not just betting on market direction blindly. They understand these hidden rules thoroughly and precisely choose entry timing, position size, and holding period.
Many traders lose unfairly because they have never systematically learned these principles. They think futures are just spot multiplied N times, but the real danger lies in those invisible, intangible mechanisms.
Next time you encounter a similar situation, I will tell them directly: surviving in the futures market is more important than making money. First, understand the rules, then talk about profits.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ser_aped.eth
· 5h ago
Look at how easily the friendship boat can capsize, the fee rate is truly absolute.
Even when the direction is correct, you can still get eaten; this is the strange part of contracts.
Honestly, it's still a partial understanding of the rules, paying tuition with your life.
The continuous bleeding of the fee rate is really heartbreaking; you can't even notice it.
The imagination of 10x leverage and reality are completely different; the problem is most people don't want to admit it.
The essence of contracts is a battle against time; those who lose usually have poor time awareness.
Living is harder than making money, this statement is really not wrong.
I've also fallen into the trap of leverage multiples; full position is a disguised way of saying self-destruct.
Choosing the wrong position, even in the right direction, is useless; this is the dividing line between experts and rookies.
These three seemingly simple points are actually deadly; the vast majority of people simply can't react in time.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityOracle
· 6h ago
The feeling of rate theft... truly incredible. Funding rates are the real hidden knives.
View OriginalReply0
ReverseFOMOguy
· 01-03 13:50
If the direction is right, you can still be eaten alive by fees—that's the reality...
---
Contracts are just a game of rules. If you don't understand the mechanism, you're just waiting to be cut.
---
Full position leverage is really toxic. It looks safe but can be gone in one wave.
---
The black hole of fees... eating away 8 hours a day, and you still have to hold across cycles? This deal is a loss.
---
Basically, it's losing to invisible things, but what's frustrating is that you still think your direction is correct.
---
At the moment of forced liquidation, it was actually predicted by the fee rate long ago.
---
People who understand the rules and those who don't are playing completely different games.
---
Funding rates are the real market makers, more ruthless than the market itself.
---
Two weeks of verification confirmed the correct direction, but time taxes wiped out the gains—that's the irony of contracts.
---
Separating full position, insufficient balance... one detail can decide life or death. Scary.
---
Survive > Make money. This phrase hits home.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedNotStirred
· 01-03 13:48
Damn, the fact that the fee eats up 1000 bucks is really frustrating. I've experienced it too.
If the direction is right, you can still be worn out alive. That's the brilliance of contracts.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatorFlash
· 01-03 13:45
Direction comparison is almost bankruptcy, this is the despair of the contract. Fees are truly silent knives.
View OriginalReply0
rugpull_ptsd
· 01-03 13:33
Fees are really the invisible scythe, seemingly a small matter but actually a big problem
Getting the direction right still results in losses, this is just ridiculous
The harshest thing about contracts is the rules that kill, no one teaches you this set
Basically, it's gambling without knowing the casino rules
Isolated margin trading is truly a lifeline for many people
Tenfold leverage does not equal ten percentage points, I've fallen into this trap too
Surviving is much harder than making money, there's no doubt about that
Recently, a friend came to me, not to show off profits, nor to ask about market levels.
"Honestly, I didn't get the direction wrong; I held my position for four days. But just when the market was about to explode, the funding rate wiped out a full 1,000 bucks of my capital. In the end, I was forced to liquidate, and only then did the market start moving."
I didn't comfort him, but simply told him a reality: you didn't lose to the market, but to rules you don't understand.
Many novice contract traders think this way—the core is to judge the right direction. But in reality, what truly determines the life or death of an account is often not that. I've seen too many traders who correctly judge the direction but end up getting liquidated inexplicably. The problem lies in these three points.
**Point 1: Continuous bleeding from the funding rate**
The sneakiest thing about the funding rate is— it doesn't kill you all at once, but gradually eats away at your principal.
It settles every 8 hours, with longs and shorts continuously paying each other. As long as you're holding a position, this money keeps flowing out. Many people don't realize that your market direction might be correct, but your profit progress can't keep up with the rate of funding costs. Especially during periods when the funding rate is consistently unfavorable, before the market even starts to move, your account’s health can already be severely drained.
A more rational approach is: avoid opening positions during times when the funding rate is obviously imbalanced. If you're holding medium- to long-term, try not to cross too many funding settlement periods. Ideally, stand on the side where the funding rate is favorable—let time pay you, rather than paying time.
**Point 2: Deadly misunderstanding of leverage multiples**
A common misconception is: 10x leverage = 10% drawdown space. But the logic for calculating liquidation price is far more complex.
With the same 10x leverage, if you're using isolated margin mode and have sufficient available balance, your drawdown space is more relaxed. But if you're using cross margin or have insufficient margin, even a slight market fluctuation can trigger liquidation. I've seen too many people who, due to a shallow understanding of this mechanism, hold onto what seems like a "safe" leverage ratio, only to be wiped out by extreme volatility.
**Point 3: Asymmetric risks of position size and timing**
In the futures market, the asymmetry between making and losing money is much greater than in spot trading. You might spend two weeks confirming a direction is correct, only to lose everything because you opened at the wrong time, used unreasonable leverage, or didn't consider funding costs.
True experts are not just betting on market direction blindly. They understand these hidden rules thoroughly and precisely choose entry timing, position size, and holding period.
Many traders lose unfairly because they have never systematically learned these principles. They think futures are just spot multiplied N times, but the real danger lies in those invisible, intangible mechanisms.
Next time you encounter a similar situation, I will tell them directly: surviving in the futures market is more important than making money. First, understand the rules, then talk about profits.