2026-01-03 15:21:03

On the computer screen, AR's candlestick chart repeatedly oscillates around the $3.5 mark. In the neighboring group, large FIL miners are still showing off their profits, but I break out in a cold sweat at the thought of executing my 17th dollar-cost averaging—last night, the dashboard suddenly flashed a blood-red alert: a major derivatives pool on a top exchange has received 47 million AR in the past 7 days, transferred from the top 10 addresses.

My finger hovers over the buy button, and the belief that "full circulation and low market cap are good assets" instantly collapses. Because on-chain data is screaming: the bottom you see might be a carefully designed escape plan by others.

Every investor who regularly invests has tasted this feeling of "fundamental understanding being completely disconnected from on-chain reality." It wasn't until I started digging into the details on the chain that I truly understood the logic behind this storage coin showdown.

The seemingly intimidating unlock pressure of FIL might actually be a stabilizing factor for long-term value. Why? Although the top 50 addresses appear to be trapped at high levels, the amount of staking added in the past six months is 3.2 times the amount sold—indicating that big players are genuinely betting on the future with real money. And what about AR's "full circulation design"? It looks good, but among addresses ranked 11 to 30, eight have recently been transferring assets to cross-chain bridges—such coordinated behavior is no longer coincidence; it resembles organized capital fleeing.

What’s even more heartbreaking is developer activity. In FIL's GitHub commits, the majority of updates are in the core protocol layer, showing that the community is still actively working. These data don't lie—they're on the chain, waiting for you to read.

FIL-3,22%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

RooftopReserver

· 01-06 12:29

Cold sweat is pouring out. This wave of AR's "meticulous design" is truly outstanding. It took me 17 regular investments to realize it. I'm really a step behind. The big investors on the FIL side are still pouring money into staking, while AR is already fleeing—on-chain data never lies, it's just that I have blind eyes. The number of GitHub commits can't fool anyone; it shows who is actually working and who is just making empty promises.

View OriginalReply0

BtcDailyResearcher

· 01-06 09:23

Oh no, it's that "bottom trap" trick again. I was wondering why so many people are taking losses on AR. The staking volume on FIL has surpassed the reduction, and paying attention to these details is really important. It's much more reliable than those who constantly boast about AR being fully circulated. Can on-chain data lie? No. But when more people look at it, some deliberately misinterpret it—that's the market's reality. GitHub commits really don't lie—more honest than candlestick charts and all those so-called prophets' predictions. It seems I need to update my understanding of "whale tactics" again. This time, I guess I’ve paid my tuition in observation skills.

View OriginalReply0

SilentAlpha

· 01-06 01:01

Damn, 47 million AR tokens silently entered the exchange. Someone is definitely pulling a rug pull. I've made 17 regular investments and still persist. Brother, your heart is really big. Is the staking on FIL actually increasing? This detail is really heartbreaking. Comparing it to AR's "organized transfer" makes it clear. On-chain data never lies. GitHub activity also reveals the truth. Why are so many still believing in faith? After this comparison, it seems that playing storage coins still requires paying attention to on-chain details. Don't be brainwashed by fundamentals. Honestly, the repeated fluctuations of AR at 3.5 are just waiting for the bagholders. Is it a coincidence that the top ten addresses are so active? Instead of dollar-cost averaging, learn to read on-chain data. Otherwise, you'll always be caught in a trap.

View OriginalReply0

ProofOfNothing

· 01-05 10:01

Whoa, 47 million AR tokens into the derivative pool, this pace feels off... --- Once again with this "full circulation = bottom" routine, getting fooled once isn't enough? --- The staking amount of FIL is 3.2 times the reduction, which is a real signal of confidence. AR is obviously quietly running away. --- In the face of on-chain data, fundamental analysis is just a joke; you need to learn to read reality. --- The huge difference in GitHub commits indicates one is working hard while the other is harvesting. Simple and brutal but effective. --- My 17th dollar-cost averaging, my fingers are trembling. I understand this feeling... but maybe it's time to stop. --- Addresses ranked 11-30 are coordinating transfers to cross-chain bridges? This is clearly a prelude to the team dumping. --- Recognizing that bottom traps are a trap is the awakening moment for dollar-cost averaging investors.

View OriginalReply0

IronHeadMiner

· 01-03 15:51

Wow, 47 million AR tokens into the derivative pool? Isn't this just big players paving the way to run away? I was wondering why this rebound is so strange. On the other hand, FIL seems more solid, with staking volume still increasing. Now that's true faith. The 17th dollar-cost averaging, fingers trembling—this feeling is just amazing haha. There is no bottom in on-chain data, only traps. The GitHub commit volume indicator is brilliant; you can see at a glance who is genuinely working. Should have looked at on-chain details earlier to avoid being fooled by the fundamentals.

View OriginalReply0

SatoshiChallenger

· 01-03 15:49

Ironically, this really hit home for me. 47 million AR tokens have entered the exchange's derivatives pool, and big players are "coordinating transfers"—just hearing this phrasing makes me realize someone needs to wake up. What do the data show? It's that old saying: the bottom you see, they've already left.

View OriginalReply0

DegenWhisperer

· 01-03 15:47

Wow, 47 million AR just entered the derivatives pool in a week? This obviously looks like someone is building a position to bottom fish. Am I stupid for believing in the nonsense of "full circulation = good assets"? I've already invested 17 times and still haven't woken up.

View OriginalReply0

AllInDaddy

· 01-03 15:44

Oh my god, 47 million AR tokens dumped, are they trying to wipe out retail investors? --- FIL is still working hard over there, while big players in AR are collectively fleeing. The contrast is clear. --- On-chain data never lies; it's much more reliable than fundamentals. --- After the 17th dollar-cost averaging, I'm still trembling. This is truly the limit of psychological resilience. --- So, is the "full circulation" design of AR just a cover-up? A scam. --- The pledged amount of the top 50 addresses is 3.2 times the amount they have reduced, which shows real confidence. --- Eight addresses ranked 11-30 are all fleeing at the same time. Dare to say this isn't a team operation? --- GitHub activity can't be faked; FIL is indeed doing work. --- Every time I think I've reached the bottom, I realize it's just the big players' dining table. --- The problem is, how can retail investors identify such coordinated transfers? It's too difficult.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-75ee51e7

· 01-03 15:31

Damn, 47 million AR tokens entered exchanges in seven days. Isn't this a clear sign of an exit scam? Still haven't learned after the 17th dollar-cost averaging. Brothers, you really should check the on-chain data. Staking on the FIL side is actually increasing, but AR is coordinating an escape... the difference is huge. Can GitHub commit volume be misleading? Yes. But as long as people keep betting on it, it means something is going on. I understand the feeling of your finger hovering over the buy button, but now it should be hovering over the check button.

View OriginalReply0

airdrop_huntress

· 01-03 15:23

Damn, 47 million AR tokens entered exchanges in seven days... Someone is really fleeing here. I understand the trembling fingers feeling; when it comes to faith, it can collapse suddenly. On the other hand, the staked FIL is actually increasing? That logic is a bit harsh; I need to take a good look at the on-chain data before making any conclusions. AR's "full circulation" now seems to be just a facade; with address synchronization and fleeing on 11-30, how can anyone still pretend not to see? The GitHub activity angle is pretty good; you can really tell if someone is actually working or just making empty promises. I also need to reevaluate my holdings; too many dollar-cost averaging investors have been fooled by the fundamentals. On-chain data doesn't lie; the problem is that most people don't look at it at all. AR's recent decline does seem a bit strange; it doesn't look like a natural correction. Even after 17 dollar-cost averaging entries, I haven't beaten the market; I need to reflect on whether my strategy is flawed. Should I change my holdings? The risk feels too high.

View OriginalReply0