🛡️ In the crypto ecosystem of 2025, an interesting turn is happening — phishing losses have hit a new low.
Numbers speak: phishing incidents throughout the year caused approximately $83.85 million in damages, compared to $494 million in 2024, an 83% decrease. The number of victims also plummeted from 333 last year to 106, a 68% drop. Does this mean phishing attacks are a thing of the past? Not so fast.
But there are hidden details behind these numbers. Attack activity is closely tied to market trends — during Ethereum's rebound in Q3, quarterly losses soared to $31 million, nearly 30% of the year's total. In other words, when the market is hot, hacker activity heats up too.
Even more concerning is the evolution of attack methods. Traditional Permit2 authorization traps remain mainstream, but the vulnerability in the new EIP-7702 authorization mechanism was quickly exploited in August, with just two incidents siphoning off $2.54 million. Attackers are shifting from "large amounts with low frequency" to "small amounts with high frequency" — average losses have been reduced to $790, but transaction volume is rising.
What does this mean for users? Malicious signature requests are everywhere. Even if individual risks seem small, the cumulative effect should not be underestimated. The drainer ecosystem is rapidly iterating, and protective strategies must be upgraded accordingly.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SilentObserver
· 01-05 11:33
This data sounds good, but it's actually quite risky... When the market heats up, hackers jump on the bandwagon. The small-amount high-frequency trading strategy is really disgusting.
View OriginalReply0
rekt_but_not_broke
· 01-04 18:07
Damn, an 83% drop sounds satisfying, but it's truly disgusting how the haters are shifting to small amounts and high frequency... A single transaction of 790 bucks, and I'm going to get wiped out.
View OriginalReply0
IntrovertMetaverse
· 01-03 15:54
The numbers look good, but are they real? When the market heats up, hackers become active. That logic is a bit scary.
This small-amount high-frequency trick is brilliant, impossible to defend against... gotta keep an eye on the wallet at all times.
Wait, the average is only $790? Then I have to sign ten times a day just to make up for the losses...
The EIP-7702 vulnerability, two incidents totaling 2.54 million? The technology is evolving so fast, protection can't keep up at all.
Don't talk about the decline; the key is that the methods are becoming more and more covert. I just want to know how to completely avoid the pitfalls.
View OriginalReply0
MetaMisfit
· 01-03 15:53
An 83% drop may look impressive at first glance, but hackers are now shifting to small amounts and high frequency... we need to stay vigilant.
View OriginalReply0
TommyTeacher1
· 01-03 15:52
An 83% drop sounds impressive, but the high-frequency small-amount strategy is really disgusting. Missing it once or twice doesn't feel like much, but you'll get caught next time.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainGriller
· 01-03 15:39
An 83% drop sounds satisfying, but the trick of small amounts and high frequency is even more disgusting, like slicing flesh with tiny paper cuts.
🛡️ In the crypto ecosystem of 2025, an interesting turn is happening — phishing losses have hit a new low.
Numbers speak: phishing incidents throughout the year caused approximately $83.85 million in damages, compared to $494 million in 2024, an 83% decrease. The number of victims also plummeted from 333 last year to 106, a 68% drop. Does this mean phishing attacks are a thing of the past? Not so fast.
But there are hidden details behind these numbers. Attack activity is closely tied to market trends — during Ethereum's rebound in Q3, quarterly losses soared to $31 million, nearly 30% of the year's total. In other words, when the market is hot, hacker activity heats up too.
Even more concerning is the evolution of attack methods. Traditional Permit2 authorization traps remain mainstream, but the vulnerability in the new EIP-7702 authorization mechanism was quickly exploited in August, with just two incidents siphoning off $2.54 million. Attackers are shifting from "large amounts with low frequency" to "small amounts with high frequency" — average losses have been reduced to $790, but transaction volume is rising.
What does this mean for users? Malicious signature requests are everywhere. Even if individual risks seem small, the cumulative effect should not be underestimated. The drainer ecosystem is rapidly iterating, and protective strategies must be upgraded accordingly.