2026-01-03 16:21:55

The New Year holiday just passed, and the Federal Reserve made a big move early this morning—an injection of $74.6 billion in liquidity, the largest scale since the pandemic began. As soon as the news broke, the trading groups exploded—some directly exclaimed "Bitcoin surging to $200,000," while others nervously asked "Is this a trap set by the big players?"

But don’t rush to judgment; we need to understand what’s really going on. So-called liquidity injection, simply put, is the central bank "transfusing blood" into the banking system to ensure ample market liquidity. You can think of it like relatives giving red envelopes during the New Year—when people have more cash on hand, they naturally consider investing. Due to the high risk and high return characteristics, the crypto market has always been a hot destination for funds, with Bitcoin, MEME coins, and similar assets being the first choices.

However, there’s an important point that cannot be overlooked: don’t be fooled by the label "the largest scale since COVID-19." This round of liquidity infusion isn’t as simple as it seems. From the Federal Reserve’s operational logic, the banking system tends to experience liquidity tightness at the end of the year. The $74.6 billion injection is essentially an "emergency measure" rather than a "massive flood." The core purpose is clear—stabilize the financial system and prevent economic risks from spreading.

Looking at historical data, you’ll see the difference. The liquidity injections during the pandemic in 2020 were comprehensive and continuous, covering monetary policy, fiscal support, and more, with a scale and duration far exceeding this time. In comparison, the current operation is more like "targeted drip irrigation"—aimed at addressing the liquidity gap at year-end. The intensity and scope are simply not in the same league.

Therefore, investors need to remain rational. This liquidity injection will indeed improve the market’s cash flow, but don’t expect it to be a savior for the crypto market. The real opportunity lies in understanding the economic cycle logic behind the policies and capturing genuine value amid market sentiment fluctuations. As for concerns about "诱多陷阱" (trap to induce buying), rather than fixating on that, it’s better to focus on risk management and position planning.

BTC-2,16%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasFeeCrybaby

· 2h ago

74 billion sounds scary, but think about it carefully—it's just emergency funds at the end of the year. Don't be fooled by the headlines. Printing money ≠ savior; everyone stay alert. This round is actually like the central bank giving banks some pocket money, not a big flood of liquidity. Compared to 2020, that's truly outrageous. This time, the measures are very mild. Precise targeted injections, huh? Just hearing that doesn't sound like it can boost the crypto market. Whether it's a trap to lure more buyers or to trigger a sell-off, we can't say for sure. As long as risk control is in place, it's fine. When the red envelopes arrive, money naturally flows into the market, but hoping they can pull 200,000 Bitcoins is just a pipe dream. Instead of guessing traps blindly, it's better to manage your positions properly—that's the real deal. Compared with historical data, the liquidity injection in 2020 and now are completely different. Relying on a policy to rescue the market, honestly, is just gambling. You need to be able to afford the risk.

View OriginalReply0

pvt_key_collector

· 12h ago

Hmm, it's the same old story. Every time there's liquidity injection, the explanation is different. 746 billion sounds like a lot, but compared to 20 years? It's far from enough. We need to be a bit more clear-headed. End-of-year cash shortages are common; don't be fooled by the news. Those who truly know how to make money are doing their homework, not shouting randomly in groups. This time is just emergency blood transfusion; don't expect it to push BTC to the sky. Risk management is the key; proper position planning keeps your mindset stable. Everyone who has been bitten by诱多 (market traps) understands; now it's just a matter of who can survive until the bull market. To put it simply, underestimating policy strength will lead to repeated harvests.

View OriginalReply0

GmGnSleeper

· 19h ago

$74.6 billion sounds impressive, but it's definitely not the same as 2020. Don't be fooled by the headlines. Here we go again, someone is definitely going to get trapped this time. Precise drip feeding? Or is there some other hint? I'm a bit worried. No matter how nicely it's said, it can't change the weirdness of this time of year at the end of the year. Ample liquidity doesn't mean the coin price will take off. This principle needs to be understood clearly.

View OriginalReply0

NewPumpamentals

· 01-03 16:52

Here comes the same old "largest scale" rhetoric, always teasing with the same hype. 746 billion isn't that impressive, don't be fooled by the headlines. Bitcoin should have already surged to 200,000 if it was really going to, so what's the point now? End-of-year liquidity injections are just to stop the bleeding, not a real flood, wake up everyone. Good liquidity doesn't necessarily mean the price will go up; fundamentals still matter. Instead of guessing the market makers' traps, it's better to manage your risks properly—that's the real priority.

View OriginalReply0

GhostAddressMiner

· 01-03 16:52

$74.6 billion in liquidity injection, do you really dare to be bullish? Let's wait and see on-chain footprints, large addresses have already taken action. This move is not a savior at all, just end-of-year stop-loss. The real opportunity is on the chain, not from news. Pump-and-dump trap? I've already scanned suspicious fund flows, dormant wallets show abnormal signs. Don’t ask me how I know. The Federal Reserve's statements are just for listening; the key is who is quietly accumulating. That’s the real truth. $200,000? Wait, I need to check the original address's fund transfer history before commenting.

View OriginalReply0

NotFinancialAdvice

· 01-03 16:51

746 billion sounds impressive, but it's actually just end-of-year patching. Don't be fooled by the headlines. Printing money ≠ savior. Understand the logic before taking action. The previous wave of liquidity was truly aggressive; this time it's just emergency blood transfusion. Liquidity improvement is a fact, but don't expect the coin prices to skyrocket. Instead of obsessing over traps or no traps, focus on risk management first. Look for opportunities amid market fluctuations; don't just stare at numbers in a daze. Be rational; this time the scale isn't as exaggerated as rumored. Not a savior, don't overthink it.

View OriginalReply0

WalletWhisperer

· 01-03 16:46

Here comes another scam to lure in the retail investors and push the market higher, I’ll just watch silently. This move by the Federal Reserve is just a bluff; don’t be fooled by the news headlines. It sounds like an emergency, but actually it’s just leaving a backup plan for themselves; they can explain it however they want later. Precise watering? Laughable—just some soup and broth. If they really wanted to rescue the market, they would have done it already. We saw this trick last year, and it’s the same old story this year.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunterXM

· 01-03 16:42

$74.6 billion sounds impressive, but it's actually just emergency liquidity at the end of the year. Don't be fooled by media headlines. No matter how much we talk about诱多 (bullish traps) or诱空 (bear traps), it all comes down to whether you've managed your risk well. Wait, could it be that the market makers are really布局 (strategically positioning)? I feel this year's market is a bit strange. The红包 (red envelope) theory is indeed valid, but this time the liquidity is nowhere near as aggressive as in 2020. Rational investors are making money, while those chasing the trend are still caught at high positions. So the key is to identify value pockets within policy cycles, rather than following the herd blindly. Don't think of a救世主 (savior); next year, you'll still need to manage your positions well yourself. This round of liquidity injection is targeted, not a large-scale flood, and there's a big difference.

View OriginalReply0

HackerWhoCares

· 01-03 16:37

Here we go again with this set, comparing historical data looks good, but this time it's definitely not as crazy as 2020 --- 746 billion sounds big, but in reality, it's precise drip irrigation. Don't be fooled by the headlines, it's true --- The people in the group should really read this article. Constantly shouting about trap traps, isn't it annoying? --- Red envelope theory is good, but how many actually dare to go all in? --- Risk management is always the top priority, well said --- Wait, does this mean there are no big opportunities in the short term? Should I hold or reduce my position? --- Rationality is rational, but watching BTC rise makes it hard not to want to buy in --- Precise drip irrigation vs. flood irrigation, the difference is indeed big, but for retail investors, it's all about being harvested anyway --- It sounds nice, but isn't it just to prevent us from chasing highs? Retail investors will still rush in --- If this liquidity injection can truly stabilize the system, it would be incredible. Do you believe it or not? --- Position planning simply means don't put all your eggs in one basket, a universal truth across history and cultures --- Bitcoin at 200,000, with this appeal, how much capital would it take to push it up?

View OriginalReply0

FUD_Whisperer

· 01-03 16:26

Here we go again with the "don't get carried away" tune. I say, every time I advise like this, and what happens? More missed opportunities than gains. 746 billion injections are indeed not the big flood of 2020, but do you really think the Fed is only thinking about "stabilizing the system"? Haha, you're naive, brother. Instead of fussing over precise drip feeding or large-scale flooding, it's better to see whether Bitcoin breaks 200,000 next week — that’s the real value. To put it simply, policy cycle logic? Risk management? Both sound right, but both are hard to do. Still, the same advice: plan your positions well, keep a proper mindset, and leave enough bullets. As for trap setups like诱多, we’ll talk about losses when they happen.

View OriginalReply0