Suppose you've already identified a certain coin about to rebound from its bottom. Someone then suggests: instead of conservative operations, why not use 70x leverage to accelerate the process?

In reality, some people have indeed done this. Turning $10,000 into $260,000 within 24 hours. The numbers are right there, and the cold, hard math of leverage works like that.

I understand this logic. When you're confident in your market judgment and certain about your entry point, leverage is like installing a turbocharger on your trade. The trader also clearly stated that he has a strict risk control plan; this is just one part of the entire position allocation.

The problem is—there's something hidden here that success stories often conceal. You're risking not just your principal's capacity to bear loss, but also your "option" on future market opportunities. One extreme success is enough to change your perception of risk, making you think this approach can be replicated and become normal. But the market doesn't think that way. Just one black swan event, or a needle below expectations, and all profits plus the principal can vanish instantly. You're losing more than just money—you lose the qualification to stay at the table.

So the key question becomes: Is there a way to pursue explosive asset growth without putting yourself in a "total wipeout" situation? In other words, is there a smarter "acceleration plan"—not by increasing risk exposure, but by truly improving the efficiency of capital utilization?

This is why some emerging financial instruments are starting to attract attention. They represent a completely different approach.