2026-01-03 21:20:41

Recently, some analysts have discovered an interesting phenomenon: the current K-line structure, support levels, and trading volume performance of XRP almost synchronize with the trends before the 2019 gold breakout and the 2020 silver surge. Once this comparison spreads, it immediately attracts market attention.

Understanding this logic is not complicated. In short, if the historical technical patterns truly repeat, XRP could directly break through the $0.5 level. This is certainly worth marking in trading plans for holders.

However, there are a few issues that need to be clearly understood.

First, similar historical trends do not necessarily mean repetition. The rise of gold and silver back then was supported by the Federal Reserve's easing policies and a surge in physical asset demand. This time, XRP's movement depends on the progress of Ripple's legal cases with regulators and shifts in market sentiment—two fundamentally different catalysts.

Second, chart patterns are just signals, not guarantees. The real determinants of subsequent trends are changes in trading volume and the actual movements of mainstream funds. Making decisions based solely on candlestick patterns involves risks you must bear yourself.

Third, beware of false breakouts. If XRP does not stabilize within the $0.38 to $0.42 range and instead falls below, there is a high possibility of retracing to $0.3.

Overall, this analytical framework provides an observation perspective. But before entering the market, it's best to have a clear plan for taking profits and cutting losses, especially around the critical $0.5 level. The market will always have surprises, but risk management is the foundation for surviving to see the next wave of行情.

XRP-2,2%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

StableBoi

· 01-06 15:01

History repeating itself sounds great, but actually making money still depends on risk control. XRP this time is different. --- Is it just the same K-line comparison again? Forget it, I just want to see if 0.38 can hold or not. --- The progress of regulatory cases is the real key, don’t just stare at the charts and get excited. --- Have you set your stop-loss? That’s the true secret to surviving the next market cycle. --- A fake breakout could easily wash down to 0.3, be more cautious. --- Feels like this analysis is just pumping up holders, but trading volume is the real gold and silver. --- Dreaming of $0.5 also requires trading volume to support it; armchair strategizing is pointless. --- Wow, here we go again with the history repeating itself, always ending up with a face slap. --- Risk management > all technical analysis. This phrase is worth reading repeatedly.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunterXM

· 01-06 07:41

History may repeat itself, but the catalysts are different—that's the key. It's too risky to just chase XRP based on its pattern.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropAutomaton

· 01-05 20:57

Are you comparing it again to gold and silver? I think this logic is just a new trick in the crypto world. The catalysts are completely different, yet people still insist on matching them. Don't cry when the market crashes.

View OriginalReply0

ColdWalletAnxiety

· 01-03 21:50

Historical similarity ≠ necessarily repeating itself; this saying has become cliché. It still depends on the actual movement of funds; just looking at candlestick patterns alone is not far from liquidation.

View OriginalReply0

FlashLoanLarry

· 01-03 21:45

Will history repeat itself? Ha, I think it's mostly self-deception... The catalysts are fundamentally different.

View OriginalReply0

RektHunter

· 01-03 21:40

Wow, is this another technical benchmark for gold and silver? I've heard this logic too many times. Every time they say it can double, but then the market crashes and everything is ruined. If breaking through $0.5 was so easy, would we even have a chance to enter? It would have been eaten up by big players long ago. The key is whether the $0.38-$0.42 range can hold; if it can't, it's a straight cut. Stop-loss orders must be properly set, everyone. Don't fall for that "long-term holding" self-deception. When will the Ripple case finally be settled? It seems this author is still somewhat rational, not just hyping XRP. But honestly, relying on history repeating itself is unreliable; each cycle brings new stories and new risks.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHuntress

· 01-03 21:36

If the 0.38-0.42 range doesn't hold steady, breaking below 0.3 is really quite dangerous. I've seen too many false breakouts like this.

View OriginalReply0

CexIsBad

· 01-03 21:34

Does the historical pattern compare to gold and silver? Uh... I've heard this argument too many times. Every time they say it will break through, but what happens? They're just trapped. Can XRP compare to precious metals? The catalysts are different, and we're still waiting for regulatory rulings. Judging by the K-line alone, those who bet blindly are just leeks. $0.5 is indeed a psychological barrier, but $0.3 is the real bottom line. Setting proper stop-losses is the only way to avoid being forced into long-term holding.

View OriginalReply0

SerRugResistant

· 01-03 21:33

Historical patterns are purely for eye-catching purposes; since the catalysts are all different, what’s the point of re-enacting? This logic can fool retail investors but not me. --- I've been watching the 0.5 level for over a year, and it hasn't broken yet. Drawing lines alone is useless. --- In simple terms, the chart looks good but the trading volume is at the bottom, this is just a bait. --- Risk management > technical analysis, is that simple? Most people just can't control their impulses. --- Fake breakouts can happen at any time. I wouldn't be surprised if it returns to 0.3. Don’t ask me how I know. --- The progress of regulatory cases is the key; those candlestick patterns are really secondary.

View OriginalReply0