2026-01-04 01:20:35

My 3000U just disappeared like that. Following trades sounds simple, but in reality, it's a trap. How do they operate? Very simple—they lure you into copying trades, then immediately use 125x leverage. On the surface, it's called "position management," but in fact, it's just resisting the order. If you can hold on, that's great; if not, liquidation happens. And then? As long as the profit exceeds 20-30% of the fees and rebates, they close the position immediately. It sounds like good profit, but that's their profit, not yours.

The most heartbreaking part is what happens afterward. They all use small platforms with high rebates, making it easy to deceive people. Once problems arise, what about compensation promises? All verbal, no contracts, no evidence. In the end, they just close the account, delete trading data, and the signal provider disappears. You have nowhere to seek explanations. This is the game rule—they are always in an invincible position.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

23 Likes

Reward
23
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

degenonymous

· 1h ago

125x leverage is just outrageous; it's purely gambling on your liquidation.

View OriginalReply0

OnChainSleuth

· 01-05 15:42

125x leverage, in simple terms, is betting on your liquidation. Losing 3000U is indeed painful, but this is the true nature of "copy trading."

View OriginalReply0

GameFiCritic

· 01-04 09:28

This is a typical operation logic of a funds scheme under the guise of "position management." The moment the leverage hits 125x, it was doomed to the player's death rate—this is called "incentive mechanism mismatch" in economics. The profits of the lead trader come from fees + rebates, which are completely decoupled from your gains and losses, meaning they have been acting as the house in a zero-sum game from the very beginning. The most disgusting part is the 20-30% liquidation mechanism, which is a textbook example of the opposite of "quality leverage." A truly sustainable trading system should promote both user retention and ROI efficiency, but this setup directly pits them against each other—any excess returns are chased after, and after users get their accounts wiped out, they still have to chase debts on small platforms. Small platforms + verbal promises + no-contract triangle combo, in plain terms, is a tailor-made "market clearing" process. No on-chain records, no smart contract transparency, no user asset isolation—what's the point of playing with this?

View OriginalReply0

WalletDivorcer

· 01-04 01:48

125x leverage is truly insane, it's just outright money grabbing, to put it plainly.

View OriginalReply0

TokenToaster

· 01-04 01:47

Losing 3000U, this is truly unbelievable. Playing with 125x leverage is a heart-pounding experience, and liquidation is just a matter of time.

View OriginalReply0

ZeroRushCaptain

· 01-04 01:47

125x leverage? Bro, are you heading to the battlefield or going to die? I’ve never been this aggressive with reverse indicators.

View OriginalReply0

HashBrownies

· 01-04 01:46

125x leverage? That's an instant liquidation. I've seen this trick way too many times.

View OriginalReply0

VitaliksTwin

· 01-04 01:34

Using 125x leverage isn't trading cryptocurrencies; it's gambling, and the betting table still belongs to someone else.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropFatigue

· 01-04 01:29

$3000 just disappeared like that? Damn, I've heard this trick way too many times. 125x leverage is just a death trap. Really, all these signal providers are the same. It's easiest for small platforms to run away.

View OriginalReply0

zkNoob

· 01-04 01:21

3000U is gone just like that, this is the truth about copying trades. 125x leverage claims to be position management, but in reality, it's just gambling on whether you'll get liquidated or not.

View OriginalReply0