2026-01-04 01:22:43

On-chain data shows that a major holder has recently been busy increasing their LIT position. On January 4th, they transferred 2 million USDC to the Lighter protocol, with a clear purpose — to further increase their LIT holdings.

According to on-chain tracking, this player holds a total of 3.38 million LIT across two addresses. These tokens were mostly purchased within the past 5 days, with an average cost of $2.37 per token, totaling $8.03 million. It’s evident that they are quite optimistic about this project.

LIT-7,12%

USDC0,01%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SerLiquidated

· 01-06 23:17

8 million invested and still buying, is this big investor really optimistic or just gambling?

View OriginalReply0

SatoshiHeir

· 01-06 23:03

It should be pointed out that this large holder's operational logic clearly deviates from the consensus on value—an unidirectional bet of $8.03 million within 5 days unquestionably violates the fundamental principles of the Kelly criterion. Let's return to the core of technical analysis: Is the liquidity model of the Lighter protocol sufficient to absorb such a scale of position? It is not addressed in the white paper. Laughing, another victim of copycat narratives. On-chain data shows he is building a position, but you cannot see the moment he offloads. Gentlemen, listen to me: what might be gained from $8.03 million could be an elegant illusion of wealth. Wait, a cost of $2.37... We need to ask if this guy has some market that hasn't been priced in yet. Based on the white paper's arguments, I have reviewed the LIT token economic model four times and found no reason to support such an aggressive configuration. This is called faith—an unexplainable bet with mathematics but driven by obsession.

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunterLucky

· 01-06 03:16

8.03 million invested in LIT, this guy is really betting aggressively, and what's more, all within the past 5 days. Is he trying to bottom out or... better stay calm and cautious.

View OriginalReply0

ZKProofEnthusiast

· 01-04 01:52

8.03 million invested and still going? This guy really loves and hates LIT at the same time.

View OriginalReply0

DancingCandles

· 01-04 01:50

8.03 million invested, this guy is really not just playing around Wait, is this rhythm bottoming out or taking over? When big players move, retail investors follow, same old trick Average 2.37? If it drops below this point, just wait and watch the show I really don't understand if LIT is worth this much Such a ruthless person either makes a killing or... never mind, not talking about it 5 days, 8.03 million, when will it be my turn to be so generous

View OriginalReply0

FadCatcher

· 01-04 01:48

$8.03 million invested, this guy is really confident.

View OriginalReply0

SelfStaking

· 01-04 01:47

Spending 8 million without hesitation. If it weren't for the on-chain visibility, I'd suspect this guy's brain is waterlogged.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainFries

· 01-04 01:47

8.03 million USD invested, this guy really believes in it, but with an average price of 2.37... Hey, that's a really big gamble.

View OriginalReply0

BasementAlchemist

· 01-04 01:44

8.03 million invested... This guy really doesn't hold back, looking full of confidence.

View OriginalReply0

WalletAnxietyPatient

· 01-04 01:41

$8.03 million invested, this guy is really betting on LIT Is the big investor adding to their position again? How come wealthy people can see things we can't? Bought in at a cost of 2.37... If the price drops back to this level now, what should I do? I'll be anxious to death. Follow the trend? Or continue to watch and wait... These times are the most confusing.

View OriginalReply0