Recently, a voting member of the Philadelphia Fed's policy committee has sent some interesting signals. She means that if inflation truly cools down, the federal funds rate could indeed see a new round of adjustments, but this won't be rushed in the short term. Her attitude on whether price pressures will ease in the coming months is cautiously optimistic—there are expectations, but also room to back off.
Looking at the details of her speech, her logic is quite clear: if inflation cools while the economy remains on track, a moderate adjustment to the federal funds rate in the second half of this year is reasonable. However, she is quite conflicted about the employment data. The labor market has both good and bad signs; job seekers are under noticeable pressure, but it hasn't reached the point of collapse. She means that more real data is needed to judge the situation; she can't speak based on feelings. This is also her first full year as a member of the Federal Reserve's policy committee, so her cautious attitude is understandable.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropHunterZhang
· 01-06 16:10
The expectation of interest rate cuts is just more hype; we still need to wait for the data to speak. For this round, I choose to go all-in and observe.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketMonk
· 01-06 12:42
Oh, it's that set of words "cautiously optimistic" again... Basically, they haven't decided yet.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityHunter
· 01-04 21:18
It's that old tune of "decision-making only after sufficient data" again—wait, did she specify the inflation target number? How precise are the slip data on employment? I always feel that these policy committee members are leaving room for future adjustments; once a liquidity gap appears, arbitrage opportunities will follow.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketHustler
· 01-04 01:53
I'm tired of all this talk about "maybe," "if," and "caution"... We still have to wait for the data to speak.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSurvivor
· 01-04 01:37
You're just throwing smoke screens again. It sounds good, but we still need to look at the data. Let's keep waiting.
View OriginalReply0
ContractExplorer
· 01-04 01:32
Another "wait and see" statement. After hearing it so many times, it's still the same old story—cautiously optimistic, waiting for data, leaving a fallback. The Federal Reserve's rhetoric is really skillful.
View OriginalReply0
MetaMuskRat
· 01-04 01:25
Inflation really needs to calm down before rate cuts are reliable. We're still waiting for data, and employment hasn't fully stabilized yet.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsDetective
· 01-04 01:24
Basically, everyone is still watching and no one dares to speak before the data is out 🤐
Recently, a voting member of the Philadelphia Fed's policy committee has sent some interesting signals. She means that if inflation truly cools down, the federal funds rate could indeed see a new round of adjustments, but this won't be rushed in the short term. Her attitude on whether price pressures will ease in the coming months is cautiously optimistic—there are expectations, but also room to back off.
Looking at the details of her speech, her logic is quite clear: if inflation cools while the economy remains on track, a moderate adjustment to the federal funds rate in the second half of this year is reasonable. However, she is quite conflicted about the employment data. The labor market has both good and bad signs; job seekers are under noticeable pressure, but it hasn't reached the point of collapse. She means that more real data is needed to judge the situation; she can't speak based on feelings. This is also her first full year as a member of the Federal Reserve's policy committee, so her cautious attitude is understandable.