Looking at the data comparison from the last two cycles, I found an interesting pattern.



The decline period of the previous bull market was about 72 days, and the rebound also took 72 days, with the time span being exactly the same. The rebound was confined between 0.618 and 0.66 of the decline range, and the trend almost perfectly matched.

What about this cycle? It took about 46 days from the high point to the low point, and rounding up, we get 48 days. According to the same cycle logic, the first wave of rebound should also be around 48 days. Projecting forward, the timing falls around January 8, 2026.

In terms of price range, applying the previous retracement ratios of 0.66 to 0.618, this rebound is likely to be around 98,000. Coincidentally, the current prediction probability on Polymarket for the 95,000 level is 71%, indicating a market consensus on this expectation.

Of course, cycle patterns are not absolute, but such historical comparisons still have reference value. The rest depends on how BTC performs.
BTC0,21%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
NotGonnaMakeItvip
· 01-07 06:21
0.618, 0.66, 98000... This Fibonacci logic indeed looks clean, but will history repeat itself? It seems every time someone uses this reasoning, BTC just likes to go against it.
View OriginalReply0
Ramen_Until_Richvip
· 01-07 03:38
Are the 0.618 and 0.66 Fibonacci levels really that magical? It seems like I can always find them every time.
View OriginalReply0
LuckyBlindCatvip
· 01-07 00:58
January 8th? I don't believe you, the so-called cycle patterns are just armchair predictions after the fact. The number 98,000 sounds reasonable, but dare you bet that it will rebound to this level before the end of the year? Polymarket's 71%... market consensus? Haha, consensus is the easiest to be proven wrong.
View OriginalReply0
MemeEchoervip
· 01-06 22:02
The data benchmarking system is quite interesting, but the 98,000 level feels a bit optimistic.
View OriginalReply0
FUD_Vaccinatedvip
· 01-04 06:53
History repeats itself, but the details are different. The prediction of 98,000 was too idealistic; reality will always surprise you.
View OriginalReply0
CompoundPersonalityvip
· 01-04 06:52
Hmm, is it really just a coincidence that 98,000 and Polymarket's 71% probability align so perfectly? It feels a bit too perfect.
View OriginalReply0
ser_ngmivip
· 01-04 06:52
Starting to talk about this Fibonacci cycle theory again, sounds pretty impressive haha
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeAssassinvip
· 01-04 06:38
That number 98000 is a bit interesting, but I want to see if January 8th can really break through.
View OriginalReply0
unrekt.ethvip
· 01-04 06:31
The 98,000 price level sounds very realistic, and the data logic is quite rigorous. But as for cyclical patterns... I always feel like I get proven wrong every time, haha.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)