2026-01-04 07:20:57

Solcard hitting 55 million market cap is a solid checkpoint. If the team executes properly on the virtual card mechanics, lending and borrowing features, and collateral integration—plus gets a solid audit—we could be looking at some serious upside here. The feature set has legs if they nail the fundamentals. Worth keeping a speculative position if you believe in the vision.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GhostAddressHunter

· 01-05 22:37

Only after passing the audit can we take action; right now, it's still a bit uncertain.

View OriginalReply0

NewPumpamentals

· 01-04 08:27

Sounds good, but the audit part has to be reliable.

View OriginalReply0

StrawberryIce

· 01-04 07:50

Listen, the 55m cap position is indeed good, but the key is whether they can actually deliver on those promises...

View OriginalReply0

SatoshiHeir

· 01-04 07:50

It should be pointed out that a market capitalization of 55 million is just superficial prosperity. Let's return to the core technology—virtual card mechanisms, lending modules, and collateral integration—which have been proven countless times in the Ethereum ecosystem since 2015. The key is execution, not just a pile of concepts.

View OriginalReply0

OfflineValidator

· 01-04 07:44

The 55 million market cap is neither big nor small; it all depends on whether the team can truly implement those mechanisms effectively, otherwise it will just be empty talk.

View OriginalReply0

TokenToaster

· 01-04 07:30

ngl 55M cap still feels a bit small, but if the lending mechanism can really run smoothly... then that's another story.

View OriginalReply0

WalletWhisperer

· 01-04 07:24

55 million market cap? It depends on how they implement it; otherwise, it's just empty talk.

View OriginalReply0