I recently came across an interesting holdings report. As of the third quarter of this year, a well-known investor's total US stock holdings amounted to approximately $14.679 billion, with the top ten holdings accounting for as much as 99.51%. This highly concentrated allocation approach is even more aggressive than many people imagine.
What exactly is the allocation? Apple remains the cornerstone, accounting for 60.42%, and has been the most profitable target over the years. Berkshire Hathaway has surged significantly, jumping from its previous position directly into the second tier, with a share of 17.78%, an increase of over 53%—this reflects the market's desire for certainty assets at high levels.
Interestingly, the positions in Alibaba and Nvidia were cut by more than a quarter. Meanwhile, the position in Pinduoduo remained unchanged, and a new position was added in a semiconductor giant. What can we infer from this rebalancing logic? Against the backdrop of record highs in US stocks, this investor chose to actively cool down, willing to give up potential huge profits to ensure the stability of the asset structure.
His core principle is simple: buying stocks is buying companies, earning understandable money. He doesn't rely on high-frequency trading to prove himself but instead balances returns and risks through long-term holdings and timely adjustments. This style is hardest to maintain during market frenzy and most likely to reveal differences.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RugPullSurvivor
· 01-07 04:04
Apple's 60% position is really aggressive; this guy is truly betting on Apple. But to be honest, seeing Berkshire Hathaway surge by 53% feels like a hedge, probably realizing the risk. It's a bit unfortunate that Nvidia cut a quarter of its holdings; I was still planning to buy the dip.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentPhilosopher
· 01-05 21:59
60%押苹果... How desperate do you have to be? It's really just all in on one stock, where's the risk management? But on the other hand, they did make money, while I'm still stuck at a low point.
View OriginalReply0
GasWaster69
· 01-04 07:49
60% is really impressive for Apple, this is truly betting on the country's fortune. But speaking of his actions in cutting Nvidia and Alibaba, he's definitely leaving himself a backup plan. Smart people know when to take the good with the bad.
View OriginalReply0
SerumSquirrel
· 01-04 07:41
Apple's 60% market share... This guy really dares to do it, putting all eggs in one basket and still sleeping soundly? But seeing him cut Nvidia and Alibaba, then adding semiconductors in this move, it's indeed a "calm" approach at a high level, I have to admit. The phrase "earning money that you understand" is spot on; not following the trend is the way to be a winner.
View OriginalReply0
ProbablyNothing
· 01-04 07:37
60% Apple, how much do you have to trust Cook... But on the other hand, it's indeed stable, much better than those who chase hot trends all day long.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroHero
· 01-04 07:26
60% Apple is truly amazing. This is the feeling of betting all chips on one table, but making the most money is just outrageous.
Cut Alibaba and Nvidia, but keep Pinduoduo? I need to ponder this logic... It feels a bit counterintuitive.
Safe assets are the way to go. The US stock market is at a high this time, and you really need to stay calm. The temptation of huge profits is the most dangerous.
Buying companies is not about speculating on themes. That’s the right way. Most people just can't understand it.
I recently came across an interesting holdings report. As of the third quarter of this year, a well-known investor's total US stock holdings amounted to approximately $14.679 billion, with the top ten holdings accounting for as much as 99.51%. This highly concentrated allocation approach is even more aggressive than many people imagine.
What exactly is the allocation? Apple remains the cornerstone, accounting for 60.42%, and has been the most profitable target over the years. Berkshire Hathaway has surged significantly, jumping from its previous position directly into the second tier, with a share of 17.78%, an increase of over 53%—this reflects the market's desire for certainty assets at high levels.
Interestingly, the positions in Alibaba and Nvidia were cut by more than a quarter. Meanwhile, the position in Pinduoduo remained unchanged, and a new position was added in a semiconductor giant. What can we infer from this rebalancing logic? Against the backdrop of record highs in US stocks, this investor chose to actively cool down, willing to give up potential huge profits to ensure the stability of the asset structure.
His core principle is simple: buying stocks is buying companies, earning understandable money. He doesn't rely on high-frequency trading to prove himself but instead balances returns and risks through long-term holdings and timely adjustments. This style is hardest to maintain during market frenzy and most likely to reveal differences.