2026-01-05 07:23:58

When analyzing a token's holder distribution, spotting a single wallet controlling over 20% of supply is a major warning sign. One liquidation move from that address could trigger severe market volatility and potentially crash the price in seconds.

However, not all large holdings are red flags. If the top wallet is tied to a recognized centralized exchange, decentralized protocol, or a liquidity locker contract, the concentration risk becomes manageable since these entities typically have governance structures and cannot arbitrarily dump on the market.

The real danger emerges when you dig into wallet labels and find either an unverified address with no clear identification or evidence pointing to a developer wallet. These scenarios suggest concentrated selling pressure could materialize without warning. Always verify who actually controls those top addresses before investing. Checking blockchain explorers and cross-referencing addresses with known entity databases should be your first step in any thorough tokenomics review.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ProxyCollector

· 01-07 23:06

Bro, I've seen the 20% figure too many times. The key is who is behind the wallet. We can rest assured about the DEX lock-up, but those shady wallets? They will definitely run away.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoPhoenix

· 01-07 17:51

Remember, when losing money, it's most important to stay sober. You could see this sell-off coming before it happened; the key is whether you've done your homework.

View OriginalReply0

SocialAnxietyStaker

· 01-06 09:56

Looking at hold distribution, you really need to be more cautious. A single wallet holding over 20% of the supply is a ticking time bomb. The dev wallet is the most disgusting. If they rug, they rug; locking funds on CEX is still acceptable.

View OriginalReply0

wagmi_eventually

· 01-06 05:47

Be really careful when looking at address concentration. A single wallet holding over 20% of the supply is essentially a time bomb. Unverified addresses are the most frightening—who knows which dev or ghost account it might be... Better to miss out than get rug pulled.

View OriginalReply0

TokenTherapist

· 01-05 07:53

Looking at the distribution of holdings is like looking at a person's bank account—20% all in one wallet? Then I'll just pass; I don't want to get harvested.

View OriginalReply0

RetailTherapist

· 01-05 07:52

20% holding directly gg, this is a ticking time bomb, right?

View OriginalReply0

GweiTooHigh

· 01-05 07:44

Regarding wallet distribution, any single address holding over 20% of the supply should be approached with caution. A single dump could cause a collapse in minutes.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketLightning

· 01-05 07:39

Just look at the wallet labels; addresses without labels are basically scams.

View OriginalReply0

PanicSeller

· 01-05 07:32

Damn... it's that kind of ghost wallet again. One address holding 20% of the tokens and daring to issue a coin? That's really outrageous.

View OriginalReply0

ParallelChainMaxi

· 01-05 07:30

Damn, it's that kind of coin used by hidden whales again, always putting on this show...