You must have experienced this kind of crash: the countdown to the ticket sale for a concert begins, your hand hovers over the mouse, and the screen keeps spinning—"Loading..." that endless loop symbol can drive people crazy.



This feeling is actually happening on-chain every day. DApp users surge, data congestion occurs, and transactions get stuck in a mess. There's a term called "chain congestion," which describes this situation.

It would be great if oracles could react as quickly as scalper software—of course, the legal kind.

The most critical aspect of a decentralized oracle is speed. APRO's approach is a bit different: it doesn't push all the pressure onto the narrow "channel" on the chain. Instead, it handles the computationally intensive parts off-chain, with the chain only responsible for verifying the final results. What does this architectural design mean? Millisecond-level data feedback.

Combined with proactive data push and on-demand pull methods, data is already in place the moment a transaction is initiated. An AI-driven verification mechanism also ensures data quality is maintained.

I’ve tried several DEXs integrated with this system, and the smoothness is truly astonishing—feels just like using a centralized exchange. This is the qualitative change brought about by architectural optimization.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MEVHunterNoLossvip
· 01-08 04:33
Off-chain processing + on-chain verification—that's the scientific way to do it, so you don't have to keep spinning in circles waiting for death.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainFortuneTellervip
· 01-07 17:31
Chain congestion is one thing, but this architecture is really impressive. Millisecond-level feedback is no joke.
View OriginalReply0
CommunityJanitorvip
· 01-07 14:09
The combination of off-chain processing and on-chain verification is truly brilliant. Finally, someone has figured out the oracle thing clearly.
View OriginalReply0
StableGeniusDegenvip
· 01-05 08:00
Off-chain processing, on-chain verification. I like this architecture; finally, someone has thought things through.
View OriginalReply0
RugpullAlertOfficervip
· 01-05 07:59
The combination of off-chain processing and on-chain verification is indeed clever, but how many of these can actually be implemented in practice?
View OriginalReply0
WalletDetectivevip
· 01-05 07:57
Off-chain computation + on-chain verification, this approach is truly brilliant and much smarter than those data-heavy solutions.
View OriginalReply0
Layer2Observervip
· 01-05 07:55
Off-chain computation + on-chain verification sounds like a good solution, but the key depends on the data—what is the specific benchmark for millisecond-level feedback, and how do the stress test results compare to existing oracle solutions? One point needs clarification: it feels like a centralized exchange operating smoothly ≠ truly solving the decentralization trade-off problem. Is there some compromise made at a certain stage? Further validation is needed. Let's first observe the mainnet performance.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterXiaovip
· 01-05 07:54
The idea of off-chain processing + on-chain verification is truly brilliant. Finally, someone has thoroughly understood the bottleneck of oracles.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)