Many people talk about the "next wave of large-scale Web3 applications," and the first reaction is: higher TPS, lower Gas, faster confirmation.
But from Rialo's perspective, what truly determines the ceiling is: real-world inputs.
The reason is simple:
No matter how strong the chain is, if it can only process "on-chain self-referential data," your applications will easily get stuck in trading and speculation. To reach the daily needs of real users, you must handle off-chain world: data, identity, time, results.
"Real-world inputs" are not empty words; they usually include 👇
1. Web data: APIs, status, content, permissions, receipts
2. Identity signals: email/phone number/social media accounts, 2FA, authentication processes
3. Time and triggers: scheduled, delayed, execute when conditions are met
4. External results: payment success, logistics receipt, risk control conclusions, work order status
Today’s Web3 often relies on a bunch of "off-chain assembly" to obtain these inputs: oracles, keepers, indexers, scripts, servers, bridges... They work, but common issues are: expensive, fragile, complex, hard to maintain. You write half the product, and the other half is "nurturing infrastructure."
This is exactly where Rialo wants to flip the script:
Instead of building a bunch of off-chain scaffolding, it aims to turn key I/O capabilities into protocol-level primitives.
So you'll see it emphasize 👇
💞Web Calls: enabling contracts to interact more directly with the HTTPS world
💞Native automation / timers: reducing reliance on external bots for "ignition"
💞Event-driven asynchronous execution: logic can wait for conditions and then continue (like .await, cross-block resume ideas)
This is very important because real-world inputs directly determine four ceilings:
Experience ceiling: users won't pay for "waiting for scripts to finish / bots to trigger."
Security ceiling: each additional off-chain component adds a failure point / attack surface.
Complexity ceiling: more puzzle pieces of contracts + external services increase development difficulty and make scaling harder.
Business ceiling: without stable inputs, it's difficult to implement risk control, credit, compliant identities, performance proofs, and real-world settlement.
Therefore, when Rialo says it aims to bring Web’s asynchronous models, connectivity, and identity experiences into the chain, it is betting on a very realistic conclusion:
The next wave of disruptive applications won't rely on faster on-chain computation but on more reliable on-chain I/O.
Don’t just look at TPS. First ask:
Where do your application's real-world inputs come from? How do they arrive? Who covers the liability if something goes wrong? 👀 ALL IN @RialoHQ
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Many people talk about the "next wave of large-scale Web3 applications," and the first reaction is: higher TPS, lower Gas, faster confirmation.
But from Rialo's perspective, what truly determines the ceiling is: real-world inputs.
The reason is simple:
No matter how strong the chain is, if it can only process "on-chain self-referential data," your applications will easily get stuck in trading and speculation. To reach the daily needs of real users, you must handle off-chain world: data, identity, time, results.
"Real-world inputs" are not empty words; they usually include 👇
1. Web data: APIs, status, content, permissions, receipts
2. Identity signals: email/phone number/social media accounts, 2FA, authentication processes
3. Time and triggers: scheduled, delayed, execute when conditions are met
4. External results: payment success, logistics receipt, risk control conclusions, work order status
Today’s Web3 often relies on a bunch of "off-chain assembly" to obtain these inputs: oracles, keepers, indexers, scripts, servers, bridges... They work, but common issues are: expensive, fragile, complex, hard to maintain. You write half the product, and the other half is "nurturing infrastructure."
This is exactly where Rialo wants to flip the script:
Instead of building a bunch of off-chain scaffolding, it aims to turn key I/O capabilities into protocol-level primitives.
So you'll see it emphasize 👇
💞Web Calls: enabling contracts to interact more directly with the HTTPS world
💞Native automation / timers: reducing reliance on external bots for "ignition"
💞Event-driven asynchronous execution: logic can wait for conditions and then continue (like .await, cross-block resume ideas)
This is very important because real-world inputs directly determine four ceilings:
Experience ceiling: users won't pay for "waiting for scripts to finish / bots to trigger."
Security ceiling: each additional off-chain component adds a failure point / attack surface.
Complexity ceiling: more puzzle pieces of contracts + external services increase development difficulty and make scaling harder.
Business ceiling: without stable inputs, it's difficult to implement risk control, credit, compliant identities, performance proofs, and real-world settlement.
Therefore, when Rialo says it aims to bring Web’s asynchronous models, connectivity, and identity experiences into the chain, it is betting on a very realistic conclusion:
The next wave of disruptive applications won't rely on faster on-chain computation but on more reliable on-chain I/O.
Don’t just look at TPS. First ask:
Where do your application's real-world inputs come from? How do they arrive? Who covers the liability if something goes wrong? 👀 ALL IN @RialoHQ
@RialoHQ
@itachee_x
@firearrowmage
@rialo_zw
@LinYue93820
@dj673285379
#Rialo