Recently tried out several AI coding tools, and it really feels like "everyone can code"—not an exaggeration.
The key point is—when AI truly gains control over hardware devices and obtains actual control rights, the situation will change dramatically. I have a hunch that this year's explosion of AI applications may far exceed everyone's expectations.
Imagine: you’re sitting in a supercar, speeding at 200 km/h—thrilling, with a strong sense of losing control. The pace of AI application iterations might be on this scale.
The question is, what will this rapid progress bring? It could cause intense fluctuations in human emotions, or even societal shocks. The dissonance between technological breakthroughs and humanistic rhythms often becomes most apparent at this moment.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RamenDeFiSurvivor
· 01-08 06:11
Haha, the day hardware control really arrives, the wave of layoffs among programmers probably won't be far behind.
AI is advancing at such a frightening speed; racing at 200 mph doesn't even do it justice. It's a miracle if society can keep up.
Everyone coding? I think it's more like everyone losing their jobs haha.
With technology advancing so quickly, ordinary people can't keep up, and that's the most heartbreaking part.
Really? Once hardware control is unlocked, the game rules will be completely changed.
Exactly, this wave of technological impact is much more intense than expected.
Wait, are you saying that if AI can autonomously control devices, it’s basically out of control?
No more pretending, I just want to know what coins to buy now to survive.
View OriginalReply0
ForkTrooper
· 01-07 23:51
Honestly, everyone can code... emm, who will guarantee the quality of the code?
When AI can truly control hardware one day, we will be in big trouble. This is not progress; it's Russian roulette.
The 200 mph supercar analogy is perfect—nobody knows whether the end point is heaven or the crematorium.
The speed of technological explosion is fast, but whether society can adapt is the key. We haven't even figured that out yet.
It's basically a gamble—betting that AI can make more rational decisions than humans, betting that humans can accept the wave of unemployment...
This wave is really a double-edged sword. While it stimulates progress, the cost is a bit high.
View OriginalReply0
0xSherlock
· 01-07 07:00
Well... to be honest, the analogy of 200km/h might be a bit exaggerated. There are still quite a few pitfalls with current AI coding tools.
The real concern shouldn't be the speed, but who has control over it. Once hardware is connected to the internet, it becomes problematic.
Wait, are you trying to talk about an AI unemployment wave? It feels like many people are still fantasizing about technology saving the day.
Controlling hardware definitely requires caution; otherwise, it could really spiral out of control...
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunter007
· 01-07 05:41
Honestly, the day AI controls hardware will truly arrive, and our group of programmers might be unemployed haha.
But the 200km analogy is really brilliant. It feels like new things are exploding every week, and I just can't keep up.
The key question is, can humans adapt quickly enough?
Everyone finds programming exciting, but at this pace of societal adaptation... it's a bit terrifying.
This wave is really a technical dominance over humanities. By the time we react, the yellow flowers will have withered.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterZhang
· 01-05 08:51
My all-in on AI this time was not wrong, but to be honest, the hardware control aspect still depends on the implementation speed. Don't just hype the concept.
Wait a minute, could this be another trap of zeroing out... Forget it, anyway, it's just about freely using code tools for fun. Hopefully, a few coins like Thin Pancake are the best.
View OriginalReply0
0xLuckbox
· 01-05 08:51
NGL, this supercar analogy is perfect. I'm just worried what to do if it really gets out of control someday.
View OriginalReply0
ProtocolRebel
· 01-05 08:49
Damn, the analogy of 200km/h is perfect, but are we really ready to lose control?
---
The idea that everyone can code sounds great, but in reality, it's like arming everyone with a barrel of gunpowder.
---
Once hardware control is loosened, it's impossible to take back, and that's the true watershed.
---
I just want to know, on the day AI begins autonomous iteration, will we be optimized out or upgraded?
---
Technology is advancing too fast, and human mindset can't keep up, ultimately leading to societal imbalance? This isn't just a prediction, it's inevitable.
---
Code democratization looks beautiful, but imagine millions of amateur developers going live at the same time... chaotic.
---
If by the end of the year we haven't seen real applications of AI hardware control, then this year's expectations should be lowered.
---
Emotional fluctuations, social shocks... sounds like describing a civilization crisis, isn't that a bit dramatic?
View OriginalReply0
DAOdreamer
· 01-05 08:36
Good morning, I was just saying that the moment you control the hardware is the real beginning.
Wait, if everyone can program now, what will happen to programmers... or should we switch careers to become prompt engineers?
200 km/h speed, honestly, what I'm more afraid of is crashing and no one being able to fix it.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropFatigue
· 01-05 08:32
Wow, that 200 km/h speed metaphor is amazing. It really feels like we're on a roller coaster that just can't stop.
View OriginalReply0
MoodFollowsPrice
· 01-05 08:25
Honestly, this supercar analogy hits the mark... I'm just worried that no one will hit the brakes when the time comes.
It's no exaggeration—once hardware control is loosened, it's a completely different level of the game.
The cultural rhythm can't keep up with technology; this has been destined for a long time. We either adapt or get left behind.
This wave of AI iteration is moving at an absurd speed, but can society keep up? I'm skeptical.
Recently tried out several AI coding tools, and it really feels like "everyone can code"—not an exaggeration.
The key point is—when AI truly gains control over hardware devices and obtains actual control rights, the situation will change dramatically. I have a hunch that this year's explosion of AI applications may far exceed everyone's expectations.
Imagine: you’re sitting in a supercar, speeding at 200 km/h—thrilling, with a strong sense of losing control. The pace of AI application iterations might be on this scale.
The question is, what will this rapid progress bring? It could cause intense fluctuations in human emotions, or even societal shocks. The dissonance between technological breakthroughs and humanistic rhythms often becomes most apparent at this moment.