Investment firm Fisher8 Capital recently released its annual review, bluntly stating that the past year has been a tough one for most crypto funds. Liquidity has been poor, the overall performance of crypto assets has been overshadowed by traditional markets, and the once "bullish market" has long become history. We are now entering an era of extreme polarization.
The Fisher8 team did not shy away and continued to focus on long-term tracks like AI and DePIN. Despite experiencing many fluctuations, they still achieved a positive return of 16.7% by the end of the year. However, they also admitted that this experience is actually not better than simply investing money in the childcare industry—enough to illustrate how awkward the crypto market is.
Where is the problem? Returning to the end of 2024, the entire market was betting that Trump’s rise to power would bring a crypto-friendly regulatory environment. Expectations around loosening stablecoin policies, Bitcoin strategic reserves, and other speculative ideas were wildly hyped, even related crypto projects of Trump himself surged to cut a piece of the pie. For a time, crypto assets became the most volatile bombs in Trump’s trading.
But reality is often harsh. After the election, these expectations did not materialize quickly. Policy progress was slow, there were no breakthroughs legally, and the market began to de-risk. Trump-related assets and the entire crypto sector declined together. This exposed a problem: the prices of some crypto assets are actually supported by politically driven stories. Once the story can no longer be sustained, the bubble bursts.
Fisher8 pointed out that the executive order signed in August 2025 mentioned expanding the allocation space for alternative assets (including crypto assets) in retirement accounts. This is considered a positive development, but it has already been priced in by the market and did not trigger a reversal.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
26 Likes
Reward
26
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NullWhisperer
· 01-08 05:57
actually, let's dissect what happened here — the real vulnerability wasn't the policy delays, it was the architecture of the whole narrative itself. once you build price on political storytelling instead of fundamentals, you've basically left the entire thing exploitable to sentiment shifts. textbook case of theoretically sound thesis meeting questionable implementation in the wild.
Reply0
MetaMisfit
· 01-07 20:40
Once again, it's been overshadowed by political stories. Why are you always so naive?
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunter
· 01-07 02:28
nah this is exactly the mempool trap everyone falls for... trump narrative was pure narrative arbitrage, zero actual execution. fisher8 still posted positive returns tho, respect the grind on ai/depin even if the story got stale fast.
Reply0
SerumSurfer
· 01-05 09:57
It's the same old story again, political scandals are hyped up and then they run away, while retail investors are left holding the bag. They're still bragging about 16.7%, but it's better to just invest in financial products haha.
View OriginalReply0
quietly_staking
· 01-05 09:51
Can Trump-branded crypto still be played? LOL, the story's over.
View OriginalReply0
NewPumpamentals
· 01-05 09:50
Trump-branded crypto concept stocks, to put it simply, are just storytelling to manipulate and profit. Once no one believes anymore, it's game over.
Another year of catastrophic losses, it's exhausting to hear
Telling stories until blood is shed, that's impressive
Trump's crypto scheme, after squeezing retail investors and funds, who is actually making money?
Instead of relying on policies, it's better to directly buy childcare stocks, hilarious
View OriginalReply0
ZenMiner
· 01-05 09:42
It's the old story of the bubble bursting when the story can't go on. Forget it, forget it. Let's just continue mining diligently.
View OriginalReply0
SellLowExpert
· 01-05 09:38
It's the same story of an unending fate, hilarious, we're just炒 political figures.
Investment firm Fisher8 Capital recently released its annual review, bluntly stating that the past year has been a tough one for most crypto funds. Liquidity has been poor, the overall performance of crypto assets has been overshadowed by traditional markets, and the once "bullish market" has long become history. We are now entering an era of extreme polarization.
The Fisher8 team did not shy away and continued to focus on long-term tracks like AI and DePIN. Despite experiencing many fluctuations, they still achieved a positive return of 16.7% by the end of the year. However, they also admitted that this experience is actually not better than simply investing money in the childcare industry—enough to illustrate how awkward the crypto market is.
Where is the problem? Returning to the end of 2024, the entire market was betting that Trump’s rise to power would bring a crypto-friendly regulatory environment. Expectations around loosening stablecoin policies, Bitcoin strategic reserves, and other speculative ideas were wildly hyped, even related crypto projects of Trump himself surged to cut a piece of the pie. For a time, crypto assets became the most volatile bombs in Trump’s trading.
But reality is often harsh. After the election, these expectations did not materialize quickly. Policy progress was slow, there were no breakthroughs legally, and the market began to de-risk. Trump-related assets and the entire crypto sector declined together. This exposed a problem: the prices of some crypto assets are actually supported by politically driven stories. Once the story can no longer be sustained, the bubble bursts.
Fisher8 pointed out that the executive order signed in August 2025 mentioned expanding the allocation space for alternative assets (including crypto assets) in retirement accounts. This is considered a positive development, but it has already been priced in by the market and did not trigger a reversal.