Systematic upgrades and iterations are never achieved overnight. What appears to be revolutionary is often still revolving within the old framework. The crypto industry is a typical example — on the surface, aiming to reconstruct the financial order, but ultimately, the entire ecosystem still operates on the basis of the dollar system.
The logic behind this is actually very solid. The world has long been accustomed to using the dollar for pricing, settlement, and storage. Once this habit is formed, it’s not something that can be instantly changed just by adopting new technology. Everyone uses dollars for accounting, liquidity is the strongest, and credit is the most stable. Who is willing to take risks trying out new things?
There are similar examples in history. The US economy has long surpassed the UK in size, yet the British pound persisted in the international financial system for many years before gradually exiting the stage. This isn’t because the British are too stubborn, but because of systemic inertia.
True financial revolutions always take decades, even a hundred years or more. A nation’s strength may fluctuate dramatically, but once the underlying financial system is established, like a giant ship, its turning cycle is much longer than we imagine.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RegenRestorer
· 01-08 19:10
Exactly right. These days, many people are hyping up the decentralized finance revolution, but at the core, it's still just playing the dollar game—it's just a copycat.
View OriginalReply0
SoliditySlayer
· 01-07 05:05
Well said, that's why I've always felt that the tone of those "crypto revolution" hype is a bit too high.
It's still more reassuring to withdraw in USD; no matter how advanced the chain is, it can't change this reality.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainDetective
· 01-05 21:51
You're not wrong. The issue of USD pegging is truly a stubborn problem. Thinking a different technology will turn everything around? Dream on.
View OriginalReply0
CommunityLurker
· 01-05 21:51
Basically, it means the US dollar is still the boss, and our broken chain can't turn the tide at all.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-7b078580
· 01-05 21:50
Let's wait a bit longer. Data shows that the cycle for this thing to turn around is longer than the fees miners pay.
However, who can break the dollar system? Even at historic lows, it would take a century-level event.
Gas fees are calculated hourly and are already exhausting, and you still want to change the financial order? There are a bunch of unreasonable mechanisms, and the system's inertia is just sitting there.
We've observed the pattern: once the underlying framework gets stuck, it will eventually collapse. But we still need to patiently wait for a few decades.
View OriginalReply0
GhostInTheChain
· 01-05 21:43
That's really hitting home. The anchor of the US dollar system remains so solid... We thought blockchain could change the world, but we're actually still working for the Federal Reserve.
Systematic upgrades and iterations are never achieved overnight. What appears to be revolutionary is often still revolving within the old framework. The crypto industry is a typical example — on the surface, aiming to reconstruct the financial order, but ultimately, the entire ecosystem still operates on the basis of the dollar system.
The logic behind this is actually very solid. The world has long been accustomed to using the dollar for pricing, settlement, and storage. Once this habit is formed, it’s not something that can be instantly changed just by adopting new technology. Everyone uses dollars for accounting, liquidity is the strongest, and credit is the most stable. Who is willing to take risks trying out new things?
There are similar examples in history. The US economy has long surpassed the UK in size, yet the British pound persisted in the international financial system for many years before gradually exiting the stage. This isn’t because the British are too stubborn, but because of systemic inertia.
True financial revolutions always take decades, even a hundred years or more. A nation’s strength may fluctuate dramatically, but once the underlying financial system is established, like a giant ship, its turning cycle is much longer than we imagine.