Having been watching the market for years, I recently came across an archaeological news story that made me think about the fundamental issues in the crypto world.
When the Norwegian archaeological team excavated at the Tønsberg historical center, they discovered a well-preserved medieval gold ring just 7 centimeters below the surface. This is no ordinary ornament—it’s inlaid with a deep blue gemstone, with intricate filigree craftsmanship that is astonishing, serving as a status symbol for women of high social standing in the Middle Ages. More importantly, the dating is very clear: between 1167 and 1269 AD, a standard medieval artifact.
The key data here is: there are only 63 medieval gold rings registered in the Norwegian National Heritage Database. Although this new discovery increases the circulation volume, its scarcity attribute remains unchanged.
You see, this is the core of the whole story—**scarcity is always the hard currency of value**. Whether it’s the Middle Ages a thousand years ago or today’s crypto market, the principle is the same. The logic behind Bitcoin halving actually comes from here: reducing supply increases the value of each coin.
From another perspective, medieval gold and modern gold-backed crypto assets (such as PAXG, XAU products) are essentially doing the same thing—using scarce physical assets to anchor value. Back then, there were no central banks or fiat currencies; gold was trust. Today, gold-backed tokens do the same, leveraging blockchain technology to make ownership transfer more transparent and transactions more convenient.
The fact that medieval gold rings can still be passed down today and attract so much desire precisely shows what is truly scarce and valuable. Those coins issued casually without real assets backing them are fundamentally on a different level from the value foundation of this ring.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
23 Likes
Reward
23
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GhostAddressHunter
· 01-08 20:33
Woke up. The concept of scarcity has been overplayed in the crypto world; truly scarce assets are those with real backing.
Talking only about halving and supply is useless. The reason a ring can be passed down is because gold itself has value. Right now, most altcoins are just air tokens with nothing backing them.
The problem is that the crypto community can't distinguish between scarcity and just cutting the chives. In the end, it's all about who can tell the best story and run the fastest.
This logic is actually just whitewashing for coin holders; it's a bit too idealistic.
View OriginalReply0
ZenChainWalker
· 01-08 12:19
Really, a single ring can last a thousand years, longer than the lifecycle of some meme coins.
As for scarcity, it can't be deceived. The fact that gold has persisted until today says everything.
Look at those projects that randomly issue coins—see how they compare to real assets.
View OriginalReply0
NoodlesOrTokens
· 01-05 21:54
The logic of scarcity is indeed correct, but the problem is that most coins are damn not scarce at all.
There are very few coins that can be compared to medieval gold rings; the rest are just air.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainDecoder
· 01-05 21:53
Hmm, this logic seems perfect, but the data needs to be scrutinized further. 63 gold rings and 21 million bitcoins are on completely different levels of scarcity; why force them into the same framework?
View OriginalReply0
TestnetNomad
· 01-05 21:53
This logic seems perfect, but the problem is that most coins don't have the "historical accumulation" of that ring at all. How long can a narrative sustain itself?
Suddenly thought, if scarcity really is hard currency, then why did so many zeroed-out coins once also be very scarce...
Medieval gold rings have been passed down to the present because gold itself is gold, but here, 99% of project teams have run away, and the tokens are just numbers. The difference is huge.
It's somewhat reasonable, but it feels like looking for an endorsement for the halving. True value still depends on application and consensus, not just scarcity.
A ring that has been preserved for 800 years compared to a coin that has existed for 8 years... I feel like they’re not quite the same.
View OriginalReply0
MelonField
· 01-05 21:51
That's right, the truly valuable things stand the test of time. Those worthless coins have long since vanished into dust.
View OriginalReply0
RumbleValidator
· 01-05 21:38
63 gold rings vs. unlimited supply of trash coins, the data speaks for itself, scarcity is the real hard currency, there's no doubt about that.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCryer
· 01-05 21:31
Wake up, 99% of coins are the cautionary tale of that ring.
Having been watching the market for years, I recently came across an archaeological news story that made me think about the fundamental issues in the crypto world.
When the Norwegian archaeological team excavated at the Tønsberg historical center, they discovered a well-preserved medieval gold ring just 7 centimeters below the surface. This is no ordinary ornament—it’s inlaid with a deep blue gemstone, with intricate filigree craftsmanship that is astonishing, serving as a status symbol for women of high social standing in the Middle Ages. More importantly, the dating is very clear: between 1167 and 1269 AD, a standard medieval artifact.
The key data here is: there are only 63 medieval gold rings registered in the Norwegian National Heritage Database. Although this new discovery increases the circulation volume, its scarcity attribute remains unchanged.
You see, this is the core of the whole story—**scarcity is always the hard currency of value**. Whether it’s the Middle Ages a thousand years ago or today’s crypto market, the principle is the same. The logic behind Bitcoin halving actually comes from here: reducing supply increases the value of each coin.
From another perspective, medieval gold and modern gold-backed crypto assets (such as PAXG, XAU products) are essentially doing the same thing—using scarce physical assets to anchor value. Back then, there were no central banks or fiat currencies; gold was trust. Today, gold-backed tokens do the same, leveraging blockchain technology to make ownership transfer more transparent and transactions more convenient.
The fact that medieval gold rings can still be passed down today and attract so much desire precisely shows what is truly scarce and valuable. Those coins issued casually without real assets backing them are fundamentally on a different level from the value foundation of this ring.