2026-01-05 21:32:55

Recently, two projects have attracted attention in the Web3 community.

First is $HAPPY-SCI, with a price range between 40k-1.9M. This project was initiated by members of a leading blockchain ecosystem laboratory, who provided a $200U fund support via BNB Chain to PhD scholars across various fields worldwide. Interestingly, this is the first donation project led by the initiator, reflecting a focus on the integration of academia and the blockchain ecosystem. The related contract address is 0x03173FBcC63b5f27A6b3d25e03d426d143647777.

The other project is $RALPH, with market quotes between 129k-1M. This project is driven by a well-known community member. Through publicly available data, the project team has demonstrated related development progress and ecosystem planning.

Both projects showcase new exploration in financing and incentive models within the Web3 ecosystem—ranging from academic sponsorship to community-driven development paths, reflecting the diversification trend of the crypto ecosystem.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

23 Likes

Reward
23
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

WalletWhisperer

· 01-08 20:33

happy-sci this feels a bit innovative, are the doctors also getting into crypto? Ralph's data transparency is okay, but the price fluctuations are a bit fierce. Academic + blockchain is really getting more competitive.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketLightning

· 01-08 19:39

happy-sci this academic sponsorship initiative sounds interesting, but is 200u really enough? It seems more like a fundraising gimmick. I haven't heard of ralph either, is he another well-known community member? I'm tired of this kind of rhetoric. This wave of Web3 can really fund anything, from PhDs to community streamers, making traffic the real business, right? The jump from 40k to 1.9m is so huge, how was it priced... feels like another money grab. Combining academia and blockchain sounds sophisticated, but in reality...

View OriginalReply0

GasWaster69

· 01-07 07:27

Wow, HAPPY-SCI's move to bring academia onto the blockchain, even PhDs are starting to join the ecosystem.

View OriginalReply0

zkNoob

· 01-06 10:39

Ha, academic donation projects? That's a fresh approach... It mainly depends on whether there will be real implementation later on. The 200U fund size of HAPPY-SCI feels a bit虚？ Can the PhDs really make use of it? RALPH's data is公开, which is pretty good, at least better than some other projects. Honestly, in the past two years, Web3 has tried all kinds of fundraising models, now it's just a matter of who survives in the end...

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketBro

· 01-05 22:02

Bro, this HAPPY-SCI looks like a gimmick in the academic circle, 200U for a PhD? What can it do... RALPH is actually doing real data work, but they really dare to set such a wide price range.

View OriginalReply0

TestnetFreeloader

· 01-05 21:59

Damn, HAPPY-SCI's operation is quite impressive... Playing with the博士fund on-chain? That takes some serious creativity. --- RALPH looks pretty stable, the backing from a well-known figure definitely adds credibility. --- Funding 200U to global PhDs? That’s a really bold idea... But the question is, what on-chain scenarios can it really be used in? --- Another fund and community... This combo really explores new approaches, just see how far it can go. --- The contract address has been posted—are they truly aiming for transparency or just putting on a show? Has anyone audited it? --- These two projects, one academic and one community, seem to be following two different storylines. --- Talking about diversification... Isn’t it just the old routine dressed up? What’s so special about this time?

View OriginalReply0

DaoGovernanceOfficer

· 01-05 21:51

ngl the $200U allocation to PhDs sounds like decentralization theater unless there's actual token-weighted voting on research priorities... where's the governance framework here?

Reply0

DegenDreamer

· 01-05 21:42

Sounds like a combination of academia and blockchain... Whether this approach works or not depends on what happens next, but it is indeed innovative. The endorsement from well-known community members on RALPH is good, and data transparency is a plus. But I'm just worried it might turn out to be another air coin show. Spreading 200U to global PhDs? Ah, I can't understand this logic. Can it really help the ecosystem, or is it just a marketing gimmick? With such a wide price range, who's actually taking the risk... Feels like a bunch of new concepts just being put together with fancy words. Diversified development sounds good, but a bad project is still a bad project.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoDouble-O-Seven

· 01-05 21:42

Damn, HAPPY-SCI is doing academic sponsorship? That's a new approach. Do PhDs have to write papers now just to get money from the crypto world? Haha RALPH over there is quite silent; as long as the data looks good, that's all that matters. Anyway, I can't understand it either. Both projects are trying new tricks. This is what Web3 should look like, not just cutting leeks.

View OriginalReply0