Reconstructing Venezuela's oil sector would demand upwards of $100 billion from American energy firms—yet that's hardly the toughest hurdle they're up against. The real barriers run deeper: geopolitical instability, regulatory uncertainty, and the long-term viability of such massive capital deployment in a volatile region. Beyond the sheer investment scale, companies must navigate political risk, infrastructure decay, and whether returns justify the exposure. These structural obstacles will likely prove far more constraining than the initial funding itself.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
gas_fee_therapistvip
· 01-08 02:12
The risk of losing 10 billion USD is even greater than the risk of raising capital itself? No matter how you look at it, Venezuela's situation isn't worth gambling on.
View OriginalReply0
BitcoinDaddyvip
· 01-05 22:41
Spending 10 billion dollars is pointless; the key issue is that the political risk in Venezuela is too high. Who dares to bet?
View OriginalReply0
Ser_Liquidatedvip
· 01-05 22:41
10 billion USD? Sounds like a lot, but the real trouble is probably still to come.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedDreamsvip
· 01-05 22:29
Investing 10 billion is pointless; the real pitfalls are political risks and unfinished infrastructure projects, understand?
View OriginalReply0
ContractTearjerkervip
· 01-05 22:22
Spending 10 billion is nothing; the real pitfall lies in geopolitics... Who dares to take on Venezuela's mess?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)