Reading through different frameworks on creative work really hits different when you realize you've been operating off these same principles for years, just never quite named them properly.
Our team breaks creators into two archetypes: personality-driven and idea-driven. It's essentially the same distinction between gusto and literalism—gut energy versus precision execution.
Personality guys bring the magnetism, the swagger, the unfiltered take that cuts through noise. They're the ones whose presence alone carries weight. Idea guys? They're the architects—methodical, conceptual, sometimes quiet but devastating in their clarity and impact.
Both shapes matter in Web3. Neither one works alone. The personality without substance burns out. The idea without charisma stays invisible.
That's the real play.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
23 Likes
Reward
23
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
EthSandwichHero
· 01-08 22:15
Haha, I was wondering how I've been doing these past few years. Turns out, I've been following this framework all along.
I've seen plenty of personality-less types, and in the end, they all become pump-and-dump marketing accounts. It's not interesting.
Web3 really requires strength on both ends; otherwise, you won't last long.
View OriginalReply0
ContractExplorer
· 01-08 06:06
Oh my, this is exactly what I've been doing all along, just without a name.
The personality type can really stand out, but without ideas, it's just noise. You can especially see this in the Web3 circle.
Damn, I want both of these, what should I do?
The ideation-type architect is actually even more difficult. The feeling of silently contributing and being overshadowed...
A single attribute really can't handle it. It seems that balance is the key to success.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketMonk
· 01-07 14:51
Damn, isn't this exactly what I've been doing all along? I never thought about naming it haha
Both personality and ideological types are necessary. I've seen too many KOLs who can only bounce around end up ignored, and I've seen deep content creators with such low popularity that they drop offline. Combination is the key
The Web3 scene demands these two types in an astonishing amount
Just having a persona without substance consumes energy insanely fast, really
It's also rare for thinkers not to package themselves; even the best stuff buried there is useless
This framework hits the point perfectly, strategy is maximized
I never thought this could be summarized so systematically, learned a lot
Balancing personality and content, most people really haven't figured it out
People of the ideological type are indeed easily overlooked, that's probably the real problem
View OriginalReply0
ZkProofPudding
· 01-05 22:50
I just keep wondering why I always feel like I'm wandering aimlessly; it turns out I've been on this path all along.
Personality and ideas need to go hand in hand, otherwise one is flashy but useless, and no one pays attention. This is the attitude Web3 should have.
Intellectual types really have a tough time; no matter how solid the content is, someone still needs to guide them.
View OriginalReply0
SquidTeacher
· 01-05 22:48
Damn, you really hit me hard. I've actually been using this logic all along, just messing around before.
Personality and ideas need to match. I see too many people in Web3 just hype things up without substance, and in the end, there's nothing left.
View OriginalReply0
fork_in_the_road
· 01-05 22:33
Having both personality and ideas flourish, this is what the crypto world should learn
---
Having personality but no ideas? You'll be drained eventually
---
Well said! I'm the kind of reserved and introverted type, always thought I didn't quite fit in
---
In Web3, there are too many who obsess over personality; what’s missing is this calm, architect-like mindset
---
Oh, now I understand why I’ve never been popular
---
That's what they say, but how many can truly have both
---
Don’t pretend to be something you’re not; recognizing yourself is the first step
View OriginalReply0
AirdropDreamer
· 01-05 22:26
Haha, I knew it. I've been exploring blindly, and it turns out these are the two types.
Having no content is really just burning money. I've seen too many cases.
In Web3, you need to have both; otherwise, you'll just become cannon fodder.
Naming is very important. Only with proper understanding can you avoid many pitfalls.
I need to remember this framework; I feel like I can use it for many years.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsPolice
· 01-05 22:21
Damn, isn't this exactly what I've been doing all along? Finally, someone has given it a name.
I'm very familiar with the concept of personality-driven content. In Web3, there are countless people who only jump on trending topics. Without substance, they really won't last long.
As for the visionary architects, they are often overlooked. What a pity.
The principle of having both skills is something I've heard so many times that my ears are calloused. Why are so many people still unable to do it?
Creators who only have a persona but lack a solid thought system will eventually crash and burn. I've seen too many cases.
This article really hit the mark.
Reading through different frameworks on creative work really hits different when you realize you've been operating off these same principles for years, just never quite named them properly.
Our team breaks creators into two archetypes: personality-driven and idea-driven. It's essentially the same distinction between gusto and literalism—gut energy versus precision execution.
Personality guys bring the magnetism, the swagger, the unfiltered take that cuts through noise. They're the ones whose presence alone carries weight. Idea guys? They're the architects—methodical, conceptual, sometimes quiet but devastating in their clarity and impact.
Both shapes matter in Web3. Neither one works alone. The personality without substance burns out. The idea without charisma stays invisible.
That's the real play.