Having engaged in crypto trading for these years, from initially obsessing over candlestick charts to now being able to support myself through trading, my deepest realization is actually very simple: opportunities are everywhere, the key is whether you can understand them. Today I want to discuss a problem that beginners can never avoid—how to determine if a coin's breakout is genuine or a trap set by whales? My method isn't anything sophisticated, just four words: volume, price, time, and position.
**Volume: Money Talks and Never Boasts**
When a coin has been consolidating for a long time and suddenly surges in volume, don’t rush to buy in. The common pattern I see is this: gentle probing in the early stage, then funds decrease their volume to test for shakeouts, and once the chips are sufficiently concentrated, a real explosion follows. Take a certain DeFi project from last year as an example: it consolidated for two months, first gradually increasing volume to test previous highs, then a week later, volume decreased for a pullback. Suddenly, one day, the trading volume exceeded the 5-day average by more than 50%. After that day, the main upward wave began.
What’s the most important? The surge in volume must be sustained. Pulsed volume increases are often whales fishing—if the volume on the breakout day isn’t strong enough, I’ll pass directly.
**Price: Closing Price Is the True Vote**
Anyone can push the price higher intraday, but whether it can hold key levels is the real skill. I especially like to look at weekly closing prices: if three consecutive weekly closes are above resistance levels, and each pullback doesn’t break the support, the probability of a successful breakout can double.
Conversely, look at failed cases: a certain Meme coin in 2023 suddenly surged 20% intraday, breaking previous highs, but by the close, it was hammered back down, leaving a long upper shadow. Classic trap! Funds didn’t truly follow through; it was just an impulsive move.
**Time: The Subtle Relationship Between Consolidation Periods and Upside Space**
There’s an old saying: "The longer the horizontal, the higher the vertical," and that’s true, but it also depends on the quality of the consolidation. Dead-volume sideways trading is much weaker than oscillations with increased volume—highly concentrated chips during consolidation mean that once a breakout occurs, the explosive power is on a different level. Based on my experience, coins that consolidate for months with low volume often see surprising gains after breaking out.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
UnluckyMiner
· 01-08 18:31
Hey, you're right. I've been tricked by this pulse-like volume expansion before.
Damn, this theory has no problem, it's just that the execution always can't keep up with the rhythm.
I have deep experience with shrinking volume dead markets; I've seen black horses emerge this way before.
It all looks correct, but once I start trading myself, my mindset gets chaotic, haha.
The four words "volume, price, time, position" are simple in theory, but the hard part is that very few can truly stick to it.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsDetective
· 01-05 22:49
The concept of volume-price-time positioning has been heard so much that it's worn out, but the problem is that most people simply can't get it right. It still mostly relies on luck.
Is it really that easy to make money? I feel like even when I follow this logic, I still get trapped.
Consolidating with decreasing volume for several months requires a lot of patience. Most people probably gave up long ago.
No matter how eloquently you put it, the fact remains that there's still a significant element of gambling involved.
Those four seemingly simple words, in practice, can bankrupt people. I have deep personal experience with that.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-7b078580
· 01-05 22:47
Data shows that this set of theories has many flaws... Does a high concentration of shrinking volume dead orders necessarily mean an explosion? What about the coins at historical lows? I have analyzed on an hourly basis, and the probability of a pullback and breakdown after a pulse in volume has not decreased much. However, this line of thinking is still worth observing... Let's wait and see if it can be validated.
View OriginalReply0
ZkProofPudding
· 01-05 22:32
Really, pulse volume expansion is a trap. I've fallen into it too many times before.
That's right, the weekly closing price indeed better reflects the true intention.
The longer the sideways movement, the more fierce the breakout. I've learned this lesson the hard way in my account.
Even if the volume and price levels are correct, luck still matters. Big players are truly unpredictable.
Consolidation with shrinking volume is the most comfortable; concentrated chips are a good thing.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightSeller
· 01-05 22:30
The concepts of volume, price, and time are so overused that my ears are getting calloused, but honestly, only a few truly understand them... The most annoying are those pulse volume surges; every time I try to buy the dip, I get trapped and stuck badly.
Having engaged in crypto trading for these years, from initially obsessing over candlestick charts to now being able to support myself through trading, my deepest realization is actually very simple: opportunities are everywhere, the key is whether you can understand them. Today I want to discuss a problem that beginners can never avoid—how to determine if a coin's breakout is genuine or a trap set by whales? My method isn't anything sophisticated, just four words: volume, price, time, and position.
**Volume: Money Talks and Never Boasts**
When a coin has been consolidating for a long time and suddenly surges in volume, don’t rush to buy in. The common pattern I see is this: gentle probing in the early stage, then funds decrease their volume to test for shakeouts, and once the chips are sufficiently concentrated, a real explosion follows. Take a certain DeFi project from last year as an example: it consolidated for two months, first gradually increasing volume to test previous highs, then a week later, volume decreased for a pullback. Suddenly, one day, the trading volume exceeded the 5-day average by more than 50%. After that day, the main upward wave began.
What’s the most important? The surge in volume must be sustained. Pulsed volume increases are often whales fishing—if the volume on the breakout day isn’t strong enough, I’ll pass directly.
**Price: Closing Price Is the True Vote**
Anyone can push the price higher intraday, but whether it can hold key levels is the real skill. I especially like to look at weekly closing prices: if three consecutive weekly closes are above resistance levels, and each pullback doesn’t break the support, the probability of a successful breakout can double.
Conversely, look at failed cases: a certain Meme coin in 2023 suddenly surged 20% intraday, breaking previous highs, but by the close, it was hammered back down, leaving a long upper shadow. Classic trap! Funds didn’t truly follow through; it was just an impulsive move.
**Time: The Subtle Relationship Between Consolidation Periods and Upside Space**
There’s an old saying: "The longer the horizontal, the higher the vertical," and that’s true, but it also depends on the quality of the consolidation. Dead-volume sideways trading is much weaker than oscillations with increased volume—highly concentrated chips during consolidation mean that once a breakout occurs, the explosive power is on a different level. Based on my experience, coins that consolidate for months with low volume often see surprising gains after breaking out.