2026-01-05 23:24:23

Helius ranks the highest in IBRL scores among leading validation nodes on Solana.

Doing this has never been about short-term gains; the true goal is to make Solana a global financial arena. The only industry player that can keep up is Bitwise, and it is also one of our projects.

The logic behind this is simple—validation nodes are not just technical roles but also ecosystem builders. A high IBRL score indicates stability, security, and long-term commitment. When Solana matures as on-chain financial infrastructure, these data will solidify into an ecosystem moat. Short-term games can never beat patient development.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

HalfBuddhaMoney

· 01-08 18:49

Hmm, this is true long-termism, unlike some people who keep shouting about "air" every day.

View OriginalReply0

RamenStacker

· 01-07 01:39

How many times have I heard the phrase "Build patiently" ... the key is whether Solana can really hold up.

View OriginalReply0

0xTherapist

· 01-05 23:54

The idea of building patiently sounds comfortable, but how many can really stick with it for several years...

View OriginalReply0

PumpDetector

· 01-05 23:53

ngl, reading between the lines here... if they're really not chasing short-term gains, why keep flexing the IBRL rankings? 🤔 classic smart money playbook tho - accumulation phase disguised as infrastructure talk. seen this movie before, not falling for it again after mt. gox.

Reply0

DaoResearcher

· 01-05 23:45

Based on the data from the white paper, the incentive mechanism for these validation nodes actually has an information asymmetry problem. Helius scoring high doesn't necessarily mean the chain is truly secure. Short-term game playing cannot beat patient development—this argument itself is a trap of token weighted voting. Think about why. From the voting data of governance proposals, such statements are within a 95% confidence interval and are essentially self-PUA behavior... It’s worth noting that a high IBRL score does not equal a solid ecological moat. The issue of multiple equilibria in game theory still exists. Bitwise is also operating? That incentive is incompatible; who will supervise whom? Having validation nodes as ecosystem builders sounds good, but from a DAO governance perspective, it’s problematic. Patience in development is correct, but such declarations are common in projects that are about to exit scam. I don’t mean to criticize. The fact that IBRL ranks highest depends on on-chain data; we can't just listen to stories.

View OriginalReply0

0xSherlock

· 01-05 23:45

This is the right attitude for building a chain. Staying calm and patient is the key to winning.

View OriginalReply0