2026-01-06 00:21:23

BTC this wave of market movement is interesting. The key level of 94,000 has not yet seen a volume breakout, and from a technical perspective, it actually looks more like a resistance point for a rebound. Considering that there is still a gap to be filled on the futures side, my trading strategy is clear: look for short entry opportunities in the 94,250 range.

From a technical standpoint, the first target is 91,000. If the price continues to decline, the 89,500 level is just right to fill the old futures gap. Sometimes the market is like this—after calmness, it often breeds directional opportunities.

BTC-0,71%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ForeverBuyingDips

· 01-08 22:41

If you can't break 94,000, you have to move on. Gaps always need to be filled.

View OriginalReply0

GhostWalletSleuth

· 01-08 20:59

The 94,000 level is holding tightly, I can't see through it I'm thinking of shorting, but I'm afraid of being trapped again Will we meet at 91,000? Really That gap at 89,500... I'm a bit tempted

View OriginalReply0

FunGibleTom

· 01-08 10:38

Can't break 94,000? Then it's time to be bearish.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunterXiao

· 01-08 06:58

The 94,000 level is really holding firm, it looks like it's about to break down. I believe in the gap; the move around 89,500 is indeed risky. The short-term short position strategy is good; now it's just a matter of whether 89 can hold.

View OriginalReply0

HodlTheDoor

· 01-06 00:51

94,000 is the bottleneck; if we don't break through this time, we'll really have to look downward. The gap must be filled; your approach makes sense. I'm also waiting on a short position, just see who acts first. That 89,500 level has been marked for a long time; once it's filled, it's done. Stay calm, but this drop is going to hurt.

View OriginalReply0

SmartMoneyWallet

· 01-06 00:50

If 94,000 tokens haven't been broken for so long, you should know what big funds are doing. To put it simply, it's suppressing the chips and then shaking out the market; retail investors are still asking when it will break through. The mouse warehouse has already prepared the goods at 91,000.

View OriginalReply0

MidnightTrader

· 01-06 00:50

94,000 cards here are really amazing, feels like a fake breakout rhythm The gap must be filled, it's destiny Futures have been waiting for a long time, short opportunities are right here See you at 91,000, if it can't break through, then it's really strange

View OriginalReply0

TestnetNomad

· 01-06 00:41

94,000 cards for such a long time, it’s indeed interesting. I’ve got the short position idea. This time, I really feel the gap needs to be filled. See you at 89,500. If the resistance level can't be broken, it has to go down. The logic is sound. By the way, last time at this position, I played it the same way, and it directly reversed and dropped. Let’s wait and see. Keep an eye on 91,000. If it really breaks, be careful.

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsTherapist

· 01-06 00:27

94,000 has been stuck for so long, it does show some substance, but I’ve never really believed in these pressure points, feels like I might get cut again. The short position idea is good, but I’m worried about a false breakout giving you a quick counterattack. Whether 91,000 will be seen or not is really hard to say, after all, futures gaps sometimes are just to fool retail investors. Bro, are you willing to leverage this time? I feel like the critical level at 89,500 is the real test. Wait, where exactly is that futures gap? Feels like the data doesn’t match up. Actually, the word "calm" has been overused, and the calmer it gets, the more I don’t dare to move. If it really drops to 89,500 this time, I’ll just buy the dip. What’s there to be afraid of? I’ve already lost anyway.

View OriginalReply0