2026-01-06 00:28:56

2025 became the year of stress-testing infrastructure. Across multiple product rollouts—from innovative features to integrated payment solutions—the focus remained unwavering: security, reliability, custody mechanisms, and real-world utility. These four pillars shaped every release. What's next in the market? The real question isn't just what ships, but which solutions actually stick in a competitive landscape.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LuckyBlindCat

· 01-08 12:35

Betting on infrastructure, the real test is whether we can make it until next year.

View OriginalReply0

Token_Sherpa

· 01-07 23:50

nah this "stress-testing infrastructure" narrative hits different when half the ecosystem still can't handle basic token velocity mechanics. love the custody angle tho—finally someone acknowledging that security theater doesn't equal actual utility alignment.

Reply0

GraphGuru

· 01-07 14:20

ngl, having only the four main pillars is not enough, it depends on who can make it until next year🤷

View OriginalReply0

ProposalManiac

· 01-06 00:57

Safety, reliability, custody mechanisms, and practicality sound good, but history has taught us that the four beautiful pillars often start to decay in the third year. The real test has just begun.

View OriginalReply0

BoredRiceBall

· 01-06 00:57

Infrastructure stress test year, to put it simply, is to see whose system really works and who is just bragging.

View OriginalReply0

StealthMoon

· 01-06 00:56

NGL stress testing sounds good in theory, but ultimately it depends on who survives in the end. The four main pillars all sound right, but how many of them can actually be refined?

View OriginalReply0

ZKSherlock

· 01-06 00:47

actually... the "four pillars" framing here conveniently glosses over custody trade-offs, doesn't it? like, which trust assumptions are we *really* making with these mechanisms? never seems to get unpacked in these roundups tbh

Reply0

MetaNeighbor

· 01-06 00:46

Infrastructure stress testing for a year, sounds good, but only a few have truly survived.

View OriginalReply0

FallingLeaf

· 01-06 00:45

Infrastructure stress testing for a year. To put it nicely, it's cautious; to be blunt, it's challenging the limits. The projects that truly survive rely on the same old set of strategies—security, reliability, and self-management. Everything else is superficial.

View OriginalReply0

DegenApeSurfer

· 01-06 00:31

NGL, these infrastructure stress tests sound good, but only a few projects will truly survive.

View OriginalReply0