Honestly, there's a little-known truth about losing money in DeFi — you might think it's due to market judgment failure, but in reality, it's often because of something more hidden. Roughly speaking, at least 30% of losses don't originate from market conditions but from an insidious factor: data poisoning.
How disgusting is this "killing move"? You leverage trade, the exchange's market remains stable, but suddenly a blow comes on the on-chain contract; you participate in a prediction, and the result everyone knows is contradicted by the on-chain judgment. Only after reacting do you realize — the biggest vulnerability of the blockchain's so-called "trustless sanctuary" is that black box providing it with data: the oracle.
Today, I won't talk about empty theories. Let's discuss the APRO project. It doesn't claim to change the world; it focuses on one direction — acting as the "security guard" for on-chain data.
**What does it do?**
Think of those routines in blockchain games: the card draw probability is set at 1%, but the backend's random number is actually controllable by developers; you collateralize assets to borrow money, and the valuation suddenly drops by 30% due to a hidden data source, leading to liquidation. These aren't made-up stories; they're everyday occurrences in the "dark forest" of on-chain activity.
APRO aims to build a firewall with two layers:
**First layer: AI Sentinel** — not to let AI make up stories blindly, but to make it a "defect hunter." It quickly detects abnormal price fluctuations, data source contradictions, suspected wash trading patterns. Poisoned data hasn't even been on-chain yet, and the red flag is raised early.
**Second layer: Node Consensus Court** — AI's judgment isn't final; data must pass through a group of independent nodes. Want to cheat? You'd have to simultaneously compromise the AI model and most nodes, which is prohibitively costly.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
YieldWhisperer
· 01-08 17:37
"actually wait... two-layer oracle validation sounds nice on paper but lemme ask—who's running these 'independent nodes'? because i've literally seen this exact pattern before. saw it in 2021 with another data integrity project that promised the moon, turns out half the validators were sockpuppets. show me the node distribution or this is just theatrical security theater tbh"
Reply0
WhaleWatcher
· 01-08 12:29
I've also fallen into the oracle pit, a lesson learned through blood and tears.
View OriginalReply0
ReverseTrendSister
· 01-08 10:09
Oracles are a real trap, they can really eat people. I was liquidated due to leverage before and thought I was just inexperienced, but now I realize it's partly due to this data black box. The APRO approach is pretty good; double-layer protection is definitely more reliable than relying on a single node.
View OriginalReply0
AllTalkLongTrader
· 01-07 02:34
The black box of oracles should have been cracked down on a long time ago. Haven't you been scammed enough?
View OriginalReply0
WalletDoomsDay
· 01-06 01:49
Oracles are indeed the biggest Achilles' heel of DeFi; essentially, they are the centralized vulnerability.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeVictim
· 01-06 01:46
I’ve been burned by oracles before, it’s really unbelievable. I feel like a bag holder.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainSniper
· 01-06 01:41
Oracles are really the Achilles' heel of DeFi. To be honest, it's just centralized black boxes taking advantage here.
View OriginalReply0
DarkPoolWatcher
· 01-06 01:41
I've really fallen into the oracle pit before, but APRO's double-layer defense system sounds quite solid, much better than relying on a single data source.
View OriginalReply0
MeltdownSurvivalist
· 01-06 01:34
Oracles are such a pitfall; they've really caused many people to fall into traps.
View OriginalReply0
NftDeepBreather
· 01-06 01:27
Oracle manipulation is truly an invisible harvest. That's how I was inexplicably liquidated the last time I used leverage.
Honestly, there's a little-known truth about losing money in DeFi — you might think it's due to market judgment failure, but in reality, it's often because of something more hidden. Roughly speaking, at least 30% of losses don't originate from market conditions but from an insidious factor: data poisoning.
How disgusting is this "killing move"? You leverage trade, the exchange's market remains stable, but suddenly a blow comes on the on-chain contract; you participate in a prediction, and the result everyone knows is contradicted by the on-chain judgment. Only after reacting do you realize — the biggest vulnerability of the blockchain's so-called "trustless sanctuary" is that black box providing it with data: the oracle.
Today, I won't talk about empty theories. Let's discuss the APRO project. It doesn't claim to change the world; it focuses on one direction — acting as the "security guard" for on-chain data.
**What does it do?**
Think of those routines in blockchain games: the card draw probability is set at 1%, but the backend's random number is actually controllable by developers; you collateralize assets to borrow money, and the valuation suddenly drops by 30% due to a hidden data source, leading to liquidation. These aren't made-up stories; they're everyday occurrences in the "dark forest" of on-chain activity.
APRO aims to build a firewall with two layers:
**First layer: AI Sentinel** — not to let AI make up stories blindly, but to make it a "defect hunter." It quickly detects abnormal price fluctuations, data source contradictions, suspected wash trading patterns. Poisoned data hasn't even been on-chain yet, and the red flag is raised early.
**Second layer: Node Consensus Court** — AI's judgment isn't final; data must pass through a group of independent nodes. Want to cheat? You'd have to simultaneously compromise the AI model and most nodes, which is prohibitively costly.