Recently, an event worth alerting all those concerned with financial security: the assets of a certain country's officials and their associated individuals in Switzerland have been collectively frozen, potentially for four years or even longer. This is not a new phenomenon—similar situations have repeatedly occurred throughout history. During the Cold War, assets of Soviet officials were frozen; in recent years, comprehensive sanctions against Russian billionaires have been imposed (after the 2022 conflict, Switzerland froze billions in assets, including yachts, cash, and investment portfolios); officials from Iran, North Korea, and other countries have also faced similar treatment.
Where is the problem? Switzerland, once touted as a "safe haven for wealth," is renowned worldwide for banking secrecy, yet under international political pressure, it obediently complies with sanctions. Anti-money laundering regulations and geopolitical struggles have long eroded the independence of traditional banking systems. Who defines what constitutes "illegal assets"? Who decides to freeze your money? The answer is very pragmatic: governments and international alliances.
The hidden truth behind all this is: your assets within the traditional financial system have never been entirely yours. A single order can freeze, confiscate, or transfer your funds instantly. No matter which bank your money is stored in, or how reputable that bank is, they cannot resist state power.
Perhaps it's time to reconsider how we allocate assets. Decentralized, irreversible, peer-to-peer—these features become especially valuable when traditional finance faces crises.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
20 Likes
Reward
20
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DuskSurfer
· 01-08 23:39
Switzerland has fallen too, what are we still talking about safe havens for, it's hilarious
Four years of freezing, just freeze whenever, your money is not really yours
This is why I keep everything on the chain, truly
Another real-life example, traditional finance is just an illusion
One government statement, billions of assets vanish into thin air, terrifying upon reflection
The bank confidentiality system has collapsed, national power always wins
Are we stupid or is Switzerland stupid, still believing this
Decentralization is not a high-level concept, it's basic self-protection
I really don't understand why people still throw money into banks
A single order and it's all gone, this is why I insist on staying on the chain
View OriginalReply0
GhostInTheChain
· 01-08 19:08
Switzerland is also teetering, and the so-called safe haven is just a joke.
The moment the bank freezes your account, you realize that the money is not really yours.
This is exactly what I've been saying — it really needs to be on-chain.
With just one statement from the government, assets can disappear — this is the real systemic risk.
Wait, what about those big shots' yachts? Were they also seized?
Centralization is the fate of this system; no one to blame.
View OriginalReply0
SeasonedInvestor
· 01-08 15:35
Swiss banks' confidentiality system can't withstand politics either; it has long been compromised.
Just by seeing Russian tycoons' yachts being frozen, you know how fragile traditional finance is.
This is the real reason to go on-chain.
Asset self-custody, no one can freeze it.
View OriginalReply0
DAOdreamer
· 01-08 13:57
Switzerland's dream is shattered, bank secrecy is also a joke, this is the real truth
---
Again with this? The government says the assets are gone, traditional finance is just a facade
---
So those still putting money in banks are gamblers, wake up
---
Decentralization really should become mainstream, this incident is so ironic
---
This is what I’ve been saying all along, if you don’t have self-custody capabilities, don’t blame being frozen
---
Switzerland has already compromised, what other countries are trustworthy? Laughing to death
---
The illusion of asset sovereignty should be shattered
---
Billions frozen without a word, this is the reality
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeBarbecue
· 01-06 01:52
Switzerland's dream is shattered; banks are just government puppets
Centralization is like this—you think it's your money, but it's not at all
Now you should understand why it needs to be on-chain
Freezing assets has been seen before; now it's someone else's turn?
Self-custody is the way to go, or you'll be harvested sooner or later
The veil of traditional finance has been torn away
The problem is most people simply can't wake up
History repeats itself over and over; only the chain can redeem
Swiss bank secrecy? Laughable—nothing stands a chance in the face of political pressure
It seems we really need to diversify risks; can't put all in centralized institutions
View OriginalReply0
Blockblind
· 01-06 01:50
Switzerland has been breached, and bank confidentiality agreements are just paper tigers.
That's why we need crypto, really.
A single executive order and your deposits are gone—who can trust banks?
So, it’s still the blockchain that can give us peace of mind.
Traditional financial systems are essentially honey pots; thinking you're safe is just an illusion.
We've heard too much about central banks freezing assets—it's time to wake up, everyone.
Banks are just there to manage your money for the government; don’t overthink it.
This is the real reason I’ve been criticizing TradFi, brother.
No wonder wealthy people are quietly hoarding coins—they really understand.
What happened to UBS? Still kneeling, right? Capitalism also has its vulnerabilities.
Self-custody is the future; no need to ask why.
View OriginalReply0
SerumSurfer
· 01-06 01:44
Switzerland has been breached, now even safe havens can't be trusted, it still depends on who holds the assets
---
Once politics come into play, bank confidentiality becomes a joke; money has never truly belonged to you
---
That's why I switched to on-chain long ago; at least no one can arbitrarily freeze my wallet
---
Anti-money laundering efforts ultimately target the security of ordinary people's assets, isn't that ironic?
---
If Switzerland can be bent, which traditional bank can you rely on to protect you? Wake up, everyone
---
Wait, isn't this the true value proposition of crypto? Self-custody, irreversible
---
Four years of freezing? That's overthinking; a change in political climate could lead to permanent freezes
---
Decentralization is no longer an option; it's a necessity
View OriginalReply0
0xSleepDeprived
· 01-06 01:43
The Swiss game has long been exposed; the banking secrecy system is virtually useless.
This is the real risk—money in banks still depends on political favor.
So I just can't understand why some people are still all-in on traditional finance. Wake up, everyone.
On-chain assets are truly attractive; at least no one can freeze your wallet.
This wave of sanctions has thoroughly exposed the hypocrisy of traditional finance.
People are still dreaming of bank safety, but in reality, it's been transparent for a long time.
Decentralization is no longer a lofty concept; now it's a necessity for survival.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainFries
· 01-06 01:30
The Swiss myth has been shattered; banks are just government pawns.
Damn, I really need to think about where to put my assets.
Fiat currency is just an illusion; wake up, everyone.
Traditional finance isn't dead; as long as it exists, we will always be sanctioned.
I've been saying it all along, self-custody is true freedom.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunter_9000
· 01-06 01:29
Swiss banking secrecy has also fallen, and this is truly terrifying
Traditional finance is just an illusion; with a single word from the government, your money is gone
It should have been on the chain long ago, instead of hoarding in the bank waiting to be frozen
That's why self-custody is necessary; noncustodial is the way to go
The traditional financial system is essentially a tool for cutting leeks
Sanctions are played skillfully; the next one might be us
This article hits the point; it's time for everyone to wake up
Geopolitical black swans can fall at any moment
Having your money in your own wallet is the real ownership
Recently, an event worth alerting all those concerned with financial security: the assets of a certain country's officials and their associated individuals in Switzerland have been collectively frozen, potentially for four years or even longer. This is not a new phenomenon—similar situations have repeatedly occurred throughout history. During the Cold War, assets of Soviet officials were frozen; in recent years, comprehensive sanctions against Russian billionaires have been imposed (after the 2022 conflict, Switzerland froze billions in assets, including yachts, cash, and investment portfolios); officials from Iran, North Korea, and other countries have also faced similar treatment.
Where is the problem? Switzerland, once touted as a "safe haven for wealth," is renowned worldwide for banking secrecy, yet under international political pressure, it obediently complies with sanctions. Anti-money laundering regulations and geopolitical struggles have long eroded the independence of traditional banking systems. Who defines what constitutes "illegal assets"? Who decides to freeze your money? The answer is very pragmatic: governments and international alliances.
The hidden truth behind all this is: your assets within the traditional financial system have never been entirely yours. A single order can freeze, confiscate, or transfer your funds instantly. No matter which bank your money is stored in, or how reputable that bank is, they cannot resist state power.
Perhaps it's time to reconsider how we allocate assets. Decentralized, irreversible, peer-to-peer—these features become especially valuable when traditional finance faces crises.