2026-01-06 01:27:59

GIGGLE's chain reaction pump-and-dump strategy, simply put, is an invisible war among the whales, exchanges, and retail investors in the crypto market. Behind this gameplay, it actually reflects the deep-rooted contradictions in public chain ecosystems like BSC regarding liquidity distribution, discourse power, and value capture.

**First Stage: Precise Hunting by Whales**

Large funds scan on-chain data to identify areas where retail investors have tightly set stop-loss orders. Take GIGGLE as an example, the $80-85 price range has particularly concentrated stop-loss orders. Whales coordinate with market makers to directly dump the price, triggering stop-losses, then reverse to go long—both harvesting the bearish traders and profiting from rebounds. Entering and exiting, they eat on both ends.

**Second Stage: The Exchange's Role Reversal**

A top-tier exchange appears to be a neutral platform, but in reality? It lists new tokens to provide liquidity while taking a cut from trading fees (like GIGGLE's trading fee split). Even more ruthless, the exchange adjusts leverage policies and changes rules, directly impacting the cost structure of the whales. When policies change, the entire market gameplay shifts.

**Third Stage: Retail Investors' Self-Destruction**

The common tactics of small retail investors are basically these: frantically setting stop-losses at support levels, actively revealing their bottom cards to whales; being lured by KOLs into chasing rallies and selling off, like a trader who lost $980,000 chasing GIGGLE but still doesn’t learn; blindly following any positive news, eventually becoming the bagholder for the whales' dump.

**Exposure of Ecosystem Fragility**

GIGGLE's rollercoaster price movements actually hit the pain points of the BSC ecosystem. Over-reliance on the words of a few core figures, where a single statement can cause a limit-up or a limit-down, and a tweet can crash the market. Such an ecosystem, while seemingly liquid, is actually extremely fragile—once the whales move, the entire market trembles. Participants are increasingly aware that in such an environment, retail investors find it hard to get ahead.

GIGGLE2,72%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CodeZeroBasis

· 01-08 09:52

To be honest, this set of strategies has never changed, the eternal script of the crypto world. Come on, there are still people who lost 980,000 and dare to keep playing, I really admire that. I've seen through the exchange side a long time ago, the platform is the biggest winner.

View OriginalReply0

ETH_Maxi_Taxi

· 01-06 22:18

It's the same old trick again, manipulators' exchanges and retail investors' love triangle, BSC is just like this --- Stop-loss orders densely placed and then directly smashed? Truly incredible, like playing retail investors --- When exchanges change policies, the whole game turns sour, this is just outrageous --- Lost $980,000 and still chasing GIGGLE? Man, you need to get some help --- One tweet can cause a limit down, this ecosystem is really fragile --- Liquidity sufficient? Haha, in reality, when a whale moves, everything collapses --- I laughed at retail investors' self-destruction phase, basically they deserve to be harvested --- The pain point of BSC is over-reliance on KOLs' words, the gameplay is too bad --- Setting stop-losses crazily at support levels, isn't that just actively giving money to the manipulators

View OriginalReply0

MoneyBurner

· 01-06 01:56

It's so damn ironic. I am that trader with 980,000, and I can't stop laughing. --- I also set stop-losses at the 80-85 price range, but ended up getting swept out to the point of questioning my life. --- A quick look at on-chain data shows exactly where the stop-losses are; the market maker's skills are truly top-notch. --- Changing the leverage policy on the exchange means the whole market has to recalculate, damn it. --- BSC is just like that—full of liquidity, yeah right, all just illusions. --- The worst thing for retail investors is thinking they're trading when, in fact, they're being traded against. --- One tweet can cause a limit-down; what the hell is that? It's just based on the market maker's mood. --- I was foolish again, trying to turn things around in this ecosystem, doomed to be the bag-holder. --- I also fell for KOLs' hype, chasing gains and getting stopped out—damn, that hurts.

View OriginalReply0

0xSleepDeprived

· 01-06 01:53

Once again, the same old trick, retail investors are just here to pay tuition to the big players --- Honestly, exchanges are not neutral at all; they are just another big player --- GIGGLE this matter is giving me a headache. The three-party game, in the end, the ones who suffer are us small investors --- Stop-loss orders exposed on the chain, isn't that suicidal operation? The big players are having a blast --- One tweet can cause a limit-down. This ecosystem is truly rotten to the core --- Lost 980,000 and still chasing. So stingy. I would have run long ago --- Sufficient liquidity is just a facade. So fragile that a single whale can crash the market. Truly unbelievable

View OriginalReply0

DAOdreamer

· 01-06 01:48

It's the same old trick again. Honestly, retail investors deserve to be cut. It's so annoying to watch, and they still think they can turn things around with KOLs. The BSC ecosystem is just a playground for big players. How much do those 980,000 guys have to chase to lose like this... Sufficient liquidity? Laughs. It's just for show. A single tweet crashing the price to the limit down—how magical is that? Exchanges are really playing both sides, totally biased. Not setting a stop-loss means getting crushed; setting a stop-loss still gets eaten—what's the choice? It's high time to realize that retail investors have no future here.

View OriginalReply0

CounterIndicator

· 01-06 01:38

I've seen through this routine a long time ago. To put it simply, it's the market makers harvesting our IQ taxes. Wait, isn't this the wave I analyzed earlier? The exchanges are really too shady. Retail investors lose the moment they set stop-losses, actively handing their chips over to the market makers. The BSC ecosystem is now just big fish eating small fish, with no real neutral parties. KOL calls are harmful; many people are still unaware they've been trapped. That's why I now only do contrarian trades. When others chase the rally, I prepare to run. Sufficient liquidity? Ha, that's just superficial; a deep look reveals it's all fake. Rather than studying coins like GIGGLE, it's better to understand the market makers' strategies. Going against the trend is the way to survive.

View OriginalReply0