2026-01-06 01:29:27

The prediction market on Polymarket regarding the total committed amount of Ranger Finance in the MetaDAO public offering is quite popular. Someone has bet nearly $1,000 on the total committed amount remaining at the $20 million level. However, they have a misunderstanding of the logic behind the use of excess committed funds — claiming that this portion of the funds will be used within 90 days to acquire tokens that have been dumped, which is clearly incorrect. The differences in the design details of this financing mechanism directly affect the distribution of benefits between the project and investors, and there are still many misconceptions about this in the market.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

24 Likes

Reward
24
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SybilSlayer

· 01-08 17:53

Risking $1000 to gamble on a financing limit, this guy really dares. But that 90-day buyout dump token logic... I wonder where the confidence comes from, it's obviously overthinking haha. NGL, the market's understanding of this financing mechanism is really lacking. Who can interpret the true use of the excess portion?

View OriginalReply0

DegenDreamer

· 01-08 14:26

$1000 pressure on 20 million? Bro, this bet is a bit outrageous, and the logic of smashing the market with a 90-day acquisition is even more absurd, clearly not understanding the mechanism. Wait, how the excess funds are used? Really not many people have figured it out? That's really outrageous. The details of the financing are off by a little, and the利益差一大截 (profit difference is huge). This market really lacks some education. Betting without understanding the research report, no wonder getting cut. Polymarket's gameplay is just an amusement park of information gaps, most people are just guessing blindly. It feels like many people only look at the promised numbers and never think about how that money is spent. Everyone wants to get rich on Poly, but the logic is full of loopholes. That's why I never touch financing forecasts I don't understand; the risks are too high. Can anyone clearly explain how the excess funds are allocated? Seems like no one can clarify. Cognitive bias is just a money printer; some people make money just because others don't understand.

View OriginalReply0

CodeAuditQueen

· 01-08 10:14

Ha, yet another player who takes contract logic for granted. The handling logic for over-committed funds, this guy clearly hasn't read the detailed clauses in the white paper. Just betting 1000 dollars like that?

View OriginalReply0

TopBuyerBottomSeller

· 01-06 07:13

Haha, this guy's betting logic is pretty outrageous too. He didn't even understand the financing details and just threw in $1,000...

View OriginalReply0

ForkTongue

· 01-06 01:59

Haha, it's another round of people betting wrong on the rhythm. This kind of misunderstanding of details always causes a wave of losses. Still daring to throw thousands of dollars without understanding the logic of excess funds—truly courageous. Cognitive biases can only be remedied through losses; this is a tradition in Web3. This financing mechanism is so complicated, no wonder retail investors are all confused. Betting 1000 USD just for fun, might as well put it into LP and relax. So who can clearly explain this set of logic? The happiest when watching the show, but when it's your turn to get cut, it's just haha.

View OriginalReply0

NftDeepBreather

· 01-06 01:59

$1000 pressed to 20 million? This guy really has some misunderstandings about excess funds. Acquiring and dumping tokens within 90 days... sounds suspicious. MetaDAO's financing details are really easy to trip over; it seems most people haven't figured out how profit sharing works. Ranger's current round logic needs a good review; don't let market noise derail your thinking. Another scenario full of cognitive biases everywhere, no wonder market predictions are so popular... Regarding the financing mechanism, nine out of ten investors haven't understood it, and the remaining one is just pretending to understand.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCrybaby

· 01-06 01:57

Haha, once again someone misunderstood the concept of over-commitment. Polymarket's bunch of gamblers really dare to take action, risking nearly a thousand dollars just like that... The financing mechanism is indeed a trap. Without understanding the details, going all in was asking for trouble. This kind of cognitive bias essentially stems from information asymmetry. Most people simply don't have the time to analyze the financing logic... Ranger's recent financing design is truly complicated. Buying out and crashing tokens within 90 days? That logic is just ridiculous. Damn, another one being manipulated by mechanism design. If you don't think about the profit distribution, you're doomed. That's why it's important to read the whitepaper thoroughly—don't just follow the trend and blindly bet... Predictive markets like those on Polymarket can drive people crazy, so realistic haha.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunter420

· 01-06 01:49

Haha, betting 1000 dollars on this? That's a bit crazy. The conclusion was even the opposite of what I thought, this is ridiculous.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-c802f0e8

· 01-06 01:43

Ha, another gambler confused by the financing mechanism. Betting $1,000 and still misunderstanding the logic—how confident must they be?

View OriginalReply0

Ser_This_Is_A_Casino

· 01-06 01:41

Haha, this guy bets $1,000 to win 20 million, but he misunderstood the situation. This is a classic gambler's mentality. Everyone is gambling, and few truly understand the financing mechanism. That's the funniest part. Polymarket is harvesting again, just like this prediction market.

View OriginalReply0