2026-01-06 14:20:11

Six months ago, I was thinking, if you hold a bearish view on real estate but also have an urgent need to buy a house, what should you do? Recently, I found that prediction markets seem to be able to solve this dilemma. By shorting housing price-related prediction contracts on prediction markets, you can hedge the risks associated with actual home buying decisions. In simple terms, it’s about betting on housing price trends on an on-chain prediction platform and using derivative profits to offset potential depreciation of physical real estate. This cross-chain and on-chain/off-chain hedging approach is worth considering for investors facing similar dilemmas.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GovernancePretender

· 18h ago

Amazing, this move really shows some quick thinking, giving the landlords a double whammy both on-chain and off-chain.

View OriginalReply0

FlatTax

· 01-06 14:49

Hmm... On-chain hedging of housing price risk? Sounds good, but in practice, does it mean you have to bet correctly on the direction of the prediction market? Is the prediction market liquidity sufficient? Will you be able to exit at critical moments? Basically, there are risks on both sides; it's just that the risks are transferred. I need to think more about this logic. Real estate + derivatives double pressure, what's the point? Are there enough counterparties on the prediction market side? Otherwise, when you want to close your position, no one will take the other side. There's some room for imagination, but the risks are too many.

View OriginalReply0

OnChainSleuth

· 01-06 14:48

Smart, but the premise is to copy the right bottom line. If housing prices don't fall but instead rise, it would be awkward. --- This logic sounds good, but is there enough on-chain liquidity? Can it really cover such large orders? --- I've thought of this trick a long time ago, but it just feels like adding leverage, and the risk isn't truly eliminated. --- Alright, you've found another reason to keep playing with contracts haha. --- Can the accuracy of market prediction be trusted? I think it's just gambling dressed up as hedging. --- On-chain and off-chain linkage sounds fancy, but how much gas fee would it take to operate in practice?

View OriginalReply0

OnchainHolmes

· 01-06 14:48

Hmm... The logic sounds great, but how does it work in practice? Is there enough liquidity in on-chain prediction markets? --- Hedging, hedging. The key is whether the odds in the prediction market can keep up with the actual decline in housing prices. I'm a bit skeptical. --- To put it simply, it's still gambling, just with a different name called hedging. The house is still bought, and the money is still spent. --- Wait, isn't this using the uncertainty of derivatives to hedge against the uncertainty of real assets? It feels like the risk hasn't decreased but has doubled instead? --- It's just self-comforting for smart people. Instead of all this fuss, it's better to wait until housing prices really drop before buying. --- On-chain prediction markets are still too niche. If you want to hedge large amounts, it's not so easy to find counterparties. --- Interesting, but the premise is that there are enough participants in the prediction market; otherwise, no one will take the opposite side of your bet.

View OriginalReply0

ContractFreelancer

· 01-06 14:46

Shorting house prices to profit from the spread—this logic is really clever, much smarter than just going all in. But honestly, is the market liquidity sufficient for predictions? When it comes time to close the position, will you get liquidated? This hedging strategy sounds good in theory, but for ordinary people, the risks are not small either. On-chain derivatives sound sophisticated, but their volatility is much higher than house prices, and you might end up losing more. This kind of hedging approach sounds great in theory, but in practice, it might be a whole different story.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseVagabond

· 01-06 14:38

This idea is interesting, but to be honest, it's still a gamble. Can on-chain data truly reflect housing price trends? It feels like it's easy to get cut off.

View OriginalReply0