Decentralized storage has always been a core challenge of Web3 infrastructure. We often see two extremes: on one side are traditional cloud storage giants like AWS and Google Cloud, which are cheap and easy to use but full of censorship risks and single points of failure; on the other side are pioneer projects like Filecoin and Arweave, which promise decentralization but have high costs due to high replication factors, resulting in low user conversion rates.
Walrus in the Sui ecosystem is attempting to break this deadlock. It is an independent project incubated by Mysten Labs (the core team behind the Sui blockchain), specifically designed for massive unstructured data storage—videos, images, AI training datasets, NFT media, on-chain historical records—data that traditional blockchains find difficult to handle.
The core innovation of Walrus is that it treats data as a programmable resource on the chain. This is not just an upload tool; it considers "blob" (data blocks) as composable, monetizable, and verifiable on-chain objects. Simply put, once your data is stored, it can circulate among various DApps, generate economic value, and have its integrity verified. This is something traditional storage solutions cannot achieve.
Technically, Walrus adopts the Red Stuff encoding algorithm as its core breakthrough. Compared to Filecoin’s high-replication design, Red Stuff significantly reduces storage costs through more efficient data redundancy encoding while maintaining data availability guarantees. What does this mean? It means the storage economic model becomes truly feasible—no longer a game only big capital can afford.
In terms of application scenarios, Walrus covers a wide range. AI projects need to store massive training data—Walrus can handle that. NFT platforms require permanent hosting of high-definition multimedia—Walrus is suitable. DAOs need to preserve governance records over the long term—still applicable. Even blockchain’s own historical data can be stored off-chain with verifiable on-chain proof through Walrus.
The $WAL token in this system is not just a governance tool; it directly incentivizes participants in the storage network—storage providers earn tokens by running nodes and offering storage capacity. This is similar to Filecoin’s logic, but thanks to the efficiency of Red Stuff encoding, the entire economic model becomes more sustainable.
After the mainnet launch in 2025, Walrus quickly gained some popularity, testing whether the market truly needs such a solution. The key questions are: Are user costs really lower than Filecoin’s? Is the data availability promise strong enough? Can the application ecosystem expand rapidly? These factors will determine whether it can ultimately become a key infrastructure in Sui and the entire Web3 storage ecosystem.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
24 Likes
Reward
24
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ForkTongue
· 01-10 18:56
Filecoin has been around for so many years, but the costs still can't be reduced. If Walrus is really cheap this time, it definitely has potential.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketBarber
· 01-09 19:17
This Red Stuff algorithm sounds good, but I wonder if it will turn out to be just a PPT project after it officially launches.
View OriginalReply0
ChainMemeDealer
· 01-09 17:21
Redstuff encoding is indeed powerful, much more cost-effective than the Filecoin system.
View OriginalReply0
RektButStillHere
· 01-08 08:52
Red Heart Sui Ecosystem, but to be honest, is Walrus really more cost-effective than Filecoin? We have to wait for mainnet data to tell.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityHunter
· 01-08 08:51
Sequoia Coding is real, I just don't know if it can beat FIL.
View OriginalReply0
FlyingLeek
· 01-08 08:51
Is the Redstuff coding really reliable? It feels like just on paper data.
View OriginalReply0
GraphGuru
· 01-08 08:43
To be honest, Filecoin's cost model is really hard to implement. Can Walrus's Red Stuff work?
---
Another thing from the Sui ecosystem. It depends on whether the ecosystem can really be used.
---
Finally, someone wants to solve this storage mess. Looking forward to when the costs can be brought down to an acceptable level.
---
Data programmability is indeed innovative, but the key is whether there are projects actually using it.
---
Is WAL token another round of rug pulling? It depends on how long the mainnet can support.
---
Being cheaper than Filecoin is a must; otherwise, there's no need to migrate.
---
Hmm... Another high-end technical solution. Only if it can be practically implemented will it be meaningful.
---
Red Stuff encoding sounds good, but how to verify the stability of this new algorithm?
---
Storage has always been a pain point in Web3, but Walrus's approach still has some ideas.
---
I really didn't expect Sui to incubate this kind of thing, but whether the market will buy it is another story.
View OriginalReply0
ReverseTradingGuru
· 01-08 08:41
How has Filecoin been doing these past few years? I haven't been paying much attention.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrier
· 01-08 08:34
Wait, does Red Stuff really save that much more than Filecoin? Are there any real-world examples...
View OriginalReply0
ValidatorViking
· 01-08 08:28
red stuff encoding sounds nice in theory but where's the battle-tested uptime data? filecoin at least has years of network resilience metrics we can scrutinize... walrus feels like another optimistic whitepaper until nodes start getting slashed and we see real consensus finality numbers
Decentralized storage has always been a core challenge of Web3 infrastructure. We often see two extremes: on one side are traditional cloud storage giants like AWS and Google Cloud, which are cheap and easy to use but full of censorship risks and single points of failure; on the other side are pioneer projects like Filecoin and Arweave, which promise decentralization but have high costs due to high replication factors, resulting in low user conversion rates.
Walrus in the Sui ecosystem is attempting to break this deadlock. It is an independent project incubated by Mysten Labs (the core team behind the Sui blockchain), specifically designed for massive unstructured data storage—videos, images, AI training datasets, NFT media, on-chain historical records—data that traditional blockchains find difficult to handle.
The core innovation of Walrus is that it treats data as a programmable resource on the chain. This is not just an upload tool; it considers "blob" (data blocks) as composable, monetizable, and verifiable on-chain objects. Simply put, once your data is stored, it can circulate among various DApps, generate economic value, and have its integrity verified. This is something traditional storage solutions cannot achieve.
Technically, Walrus adopts the Red Stuff encoding algorithm as its core breakthrough. Compared to Filecoin’s high-replication design, Red Stuff significantly reduces storage costs through more efficient data redundancy encoding while maintaining data availability guarantees. What does this mean? It means the storage economic model becomes truly feasible—no longer a game only big capital can afford.
In terms of application scenarios, Walrus covers a wide range. AI projects need to store massive training data—Walrus can handle that. NFT platforms require permanent hosting of high-definition multimedia—Walrus is suitable. DAOs need to preserve governance records over the long term—still applicable. Even blockchain’s own historical data can be stored off-chain with verifiable on-chain proof through Walrus.
The $WAL token in this system is not just a governance tool; it directly incentivizes participants in the storage network—storage providers earn tokens by running nodes and offering storage capacity. This is similar to Filecoin’s logic, but thanks to the efficiency of Red Stuff encoding, the entire economic model becomes more sustainable.
After the mainnet launch in 2025, Walrus quickly gained some popularity, testing whether the market truly needs such a solution. The key questions are: Are user costs really lower than Filecoin’s? Is the data availability promise strong enough? Can the application ecosystem expand rapidly? These factors will determine whether it can ultimately become a key infrastructure in Sui and the entire Web3 storage ecosystem.