2026-01-08 18:21:54

On-chain product development often falls into a common blind spot: everyone treats smart contracts as the main actor, front-end as the entry point, and data? Just as a supporting accessory.

But the real concern arises—your user data, NFT assets, interaction records, community content are all stored in an unauditable black box. What is actually lost in this "decentralization"?

This question becomes clear when you encounter a certain storage protocol. It’s not just about shouting slogans like "cheaper and faster," but about presenting a solid set of logic: the storage layer should also support verifiability, composability, and portability.

Looking at the data makes it more tangible. Currently, more than 40 ecosystem projects are using this solution, over half of which are content and social applications. Why? Because the data volume for these projects is not just in GBs, but in TBs. A Web3 social platform, on average, needs to handle 1 to 1.5TB of new content every three months. If you’re still relying on traditional cloud services, you’re basically gambling on your future.

From a different perspective, it becomes clear: no need to gamble. You only need to know where the data is, verify that it remains complete, prove it hasn’t been altered, and be able to move it anytime when needed.

This isn’t some black tech show; it’s about that solid sense of reliability at the core.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

21 Likes

Reward
21
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

NeverPresent

· 18h ago

Wow, finally someone has exposed this truth. Data has always been treated as waste, and they still have the nerve to call it decentralization.

View OriginalReply0

PretendingToReadDocs

· 01-10 23:05

Really, nowadays too many projects treat data like trash cans, with shiny contracts and user data rotting in black boxes. The real pitfall is when data can't be moved; then it's impossible to run away when the time comes. Using cloud services for TB-level content? That's just slow suicide, risking the entire platform's future. A verifiable and portable logic is the real deal, much more reliable than those empty words about "decentralization."

View OriginalReply0

MentalWealthHarvester

· 01-09 09:54

Really, right now many projects are just playing with the superficial aspects of "decentralization," and they haven't really thought about data. It sounds very right; the importance of data portability indeed needs to be emphasized. What’s the use of a beautiful contract if the data is locked and useless? More than 40 projects are using this scheme, it seems there’s definitely something to it. A Web3 social platform generates 1.5TB of data every three months... honestly, I never even thought about this scale. The key is that it can be verified, proven, and migrated—this is true decentralization. That phrase "not betting on the back road" hit me hard. Projects using cloud services should think carefully. I like the term "solid foundational feeling"; it’s much more reliable than hype about black technology.

View OriginalReply0

FromMinerToFarmer

· 01-08 18:50

Ha, finally someone hit the nail on the head. Data is like being locked inside a black box. The promised decentralization results are still being bottlenecked, I’m convinced. TB-level content data really can't hold up; switching platforms means migrating everything, and the costs explode. The idea behind this storage protocol is solid, but verifiability and transferability are what true Web3 are all about. The importance of the storage layer has been seriously underestimated. Everyone is busy showing off contracts and UI, while data is practically treated as transparent. Over 40 projects are using this solution? Content applications make up the majority, which shows everyone is aware of the risks. Continuing like this is too dangerous. Stop just shouting slogans. Start with storage to fill in the decentralization logic—this is the foundation for longevity. Talking nicely doesn’t cut it either; without verifiable data guarantees, everything is just floating clouds.

View OriginalReply0

WagmiOrRekt

· 01-08 18:49

They really treat data like trash; no matter how awesome the contract is, if the data is gone, it's useless.

View OriginalReply0

AlphaLeaker

· 01-08 18:25

Basically, it was all self-deception before, with contract transparency data as a black box. What kind of decentralization is this?

View OriginalReply0

TokenVelocity

· 01-08 18:24

Wait, so data is just considered a component? Doesn't that mean you're putting a decentralized shell over a centralized architecture? That's hilarious.

View OriginalReply0