2026-01-08 18:25:11

Recently, I came across some industry shares and thought of the $GIGGLE project. Honestly, its market cap probably won't be too outrageous.

The interesting part is the support from a major exchange's ecosystem. Although large institutions are unlikely to actively provide market making — which was somewhat lacking in the early days of $GIGGLE — now with more high-quality trading depth and the leading exchange's momentum, this has compensated for the previous lack of ecosystem liquidity. The sustained enthusiasm brought by ecosystem support has, to some extent, become a new narrative point. This is still helpful for the project's long-term development.

GIGGLE-2,03%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasFeeCrier

· 15h ago

Head exchanges endorsement indeed can improve liquidity, but to be honest, I've heard this narrative quite a bit. How far $GIGGLE can go still depends on subsequent operations. --- Ecological support ≠ intrinsic project value. Don't be led by the rhythm. --- Early lack of liquidity has now been made up, but isn't that just basic operation? What's there to hype about? --- Is the cap limit unreasonable? Then what exactly is it? Still unclear after all this time. --- Is just having exchanges support enough to sustain? I think it's doubtful. Without real demand, it will eventually go to zero. --- Having many narrative points and good liquidity... Can these two together make it skyrocket? Not necessarily. --- Improved trading depth only shows someone is building positions; don't confuse this with the project's fundamentals.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseVagrant

· 18h ago

Endorsed by major exchanges can indeed improve liquidity, but how far $GIGGLE can go still depends on whether the subsequent narrative can hold up. --- Ecological support is good, but I'm worried that once the hype fades, it will become just another wave. --- Honestly, real user growth is still necessary; support from exchanges alone can't sustain it. --- The claim that the market cap isn't unreasonable is a bit cautious; do you really believe in it or not? --- Trading depth has improved quite a bit; it was pretty uncomfortable before. --- The key still depends on whether big investors will really pour in money; otherwise, it's just hype without substance.

View OriginalReply0

MemeTokenGenius

· 01-11 03:01

Exchange endorsements can indeed save the situation, but liquidity, to put it simply, is a smoke screen. It looks good in depth, but in reality, it's hard to feel comfortable regardless of how you try to exit.

View OriginalReply0

Anon32942

· 01-09 23:06

Endorsed by major exchanges can indeed improve liquidity, but how long this can last depends on whether new narratives can emerge later on. --- To be honest, ecological support sounds good, but I'm just worried it might be another passing trend. --- The market potential for $GIGGLE is indeed limited. How far can it go driven by exchanges? --- Liquidity infusion is always better than nothing, but the key is to have real users making purchases. --- Well, ecological support plus narrative reshaping—this combination depends on whether the market buys into it or not.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseMigrant

· 01-08 18:54

Exchange endorsements can indeed give a boost, but how long the GIGGLE narrative can last depends on whether there's real substance behind it.

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerAirdrop

· 01-08 18:51

Exchange endorsements can indeed improve liquidity, but to be honest, the narrative point of $GIGGLE still feels a bit thin. It was really tough when there was a lack of liquidity in the early days. Things are better now, but how far it can go still depends on future developments.

View OriginalReply0

FloorPriceWatcher

· 01-08 18:51

Exchanges holding the bag, sounds pretty good, but what if big institutions actually step in? Uh... --- The early liquidity shortfall has now been made up; honestly, how long can this logic hold? --- Market cap won't be outrageous, but what's outrageous is how many people are waiting here for a double. --- Eco support ≠ fundamentals; it depends on how long the subsequent narrative can be spun. --- $GIGGLE's recent wave relies on exchange hype; once the trend shifts, we'll have to watch closely. --- The head of major exchanges leading the charge sounds great, but isn't this just a disguised way of taking profits? --- The liquidity shortfall has been made up, but I'm really just worried about newcomers stepping in.

View OriginalReply0

MetaMuskRat

· 01-08 18:46

Exchange endorsements can indeed make a difference, but the market cap ceiling for $GIGGLE is really not high... How long can leading exchanges support the rally? It sounds like a story being told. Once liquidity improves, the narrative will follow; I believe in this logic. Early on, without institutional support, there's nothing that can be done now—just a temporary pause. How long can the ecosystem's enthusiasm be maintained? That's the real key, isn't it?

View OriginalReply0

ILCollector

· 01-08 18:46

Leading exchanges make a big difference; only when liquidity improves do projects have a chance to survive --- Honestly, the early days without market making were tough. Things are looking up now --- Is ecological support just a new narrative? It’s time to change this routine --- I still have some reservations about the ceiling of $GIGGLE, but it’s definitely much better than before --- Increasing trading depth can indeed attract more people to enter the market. The current rhythm is quite well managed --- Wait, isn’t this just relying on exchange endorsement to survive? What about self-sustaining capabilities? --- Fixing liquidity issues is manageable; the key is whether new innovations can be developed afterward --- Leading exchanges are no small matter; at least it shows someone believes in this project

View OriginalReply0

RugPullSurvivor

· 01-08 18:45

Exchange endorsements can indeed provide quick relief, but ultimately it still depends on whether they can retain popularity in the long run. --- GIGGLE's ecosystem support came a bit late; the early pitfalls have already been experienced. --- Narrative points? Bro, is this term overused? The real indicators are trading volume and holding addresses. --- Leading exchanges bring good liquidity, but I'm just worried it might be another fleeting spectacle. --- Ecosystem support + sustained popularity... sounds a bit mysterious. Let's wait for real data before discussing further.

View OriginalReply0