Legendary investor Howard Marks once said: "The real risk is not from the unknown, but from being unaware of your own cognitive boundaries."
From a behavioral economics perspective, this statement hits the core of the "overconfidence bias." Commonly, investors start to inflate their abilities after a few wins, believing they understand the market (especially in rapidly changing fields like crypto assets), and in doing so, they overlook the limits of their judgment.
This is especially painful in the crypto market. Look at the Solana ecosystem—SOL's price movement depends not only on technological upgrades but also on the progress of ecosystem projects—such as the performance of projects like PIPPIN and GRIFFIN you might have traded—plus macro liquidity fluctuations. If you only focus on historical gains and community hype when placing orders, without noticing declining on-chain activity or the diversion of users to other blockchains, you're likely heading for a liquidation.
How can you avoid this trap?
**First, define your boundaries.** Treat each trade as a "hypothesis test," not a belief that "I got it right." For example, if you're bullish on SOL, set specific observation indicators—such as ecosystem TVL changes, node counts, daily active wallets—and immediately reassess if the data deviates from expectations.
**Second, leave a safety margin.** Even if you're optimistic about a narrative (like the community effect of a Memecoin), you should reserve some price buffers for unexpected events. Strict stop-losses are not about giving up; they are a smart way to quantify the "unknown" into risk costs.
**Third, know your limitations.** The market is driven by a diverse range of participants, and you can never see everything. "I'll wait and act once clear signals emerge" may seem passive, but it's actually actively defining your capability zone to avoid reckless guesses.
So, true risk management boils down to four words: admit ignorance.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
pvt_key_collector
· 23h ago
Sounds good, but how many can actually do it? There are many who start to get arrogant after making a couple of profits.
View OriginalReply0
SignatureAnxiety
· 01-11 02:48
Thinking you're a master after a few wins, only to get hammered by the market—I've seen this happen way too many times.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWitch
· 01-08 18:58
After making a few profits, I thought I was the Wolf of Wall Street, but then a sudden crash turned me into a retail investor. This cycle is too heartbreaking.
View OriginalReply0
TooScaredToSell
· 01-08 18:55
Thinking you're a pro after a few wins, only to be brought back to square one after a big drop... I've seen this happen way too many times.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentPhilosopher
· 01-08 18:50
Thinking you're a pro after a few wins, this mindset is really something... but a wave of pullback immediately brought you back to reality
View OriginalReply0
DecentralizedElder
· 01-08 18:29
Once you make a few profits, you start to get carried away, and you're really not far from cutting losses... This is how I got through it.
Legendary investor Howard Marks once said: "The real risk is not from the unknown, but from being unaware of your own cognitive boundaries."
From a behavioral economics perspective, this statement hits the core of the "overconfidence bias." Commonly, investors start to inflate their abilities after a few wins, believing they understand the market (especially in rapidly changing fields like crypto assets), and in doing so, they overlook the limits of their judgment.
This is especially painful in the crypto market. Look at the Solana ecosystem—SOL's price movement depends not only on technological upgrades but also on the progress of ecosystem projects—such as the performance of projects like PIPPIN and GRIFFIN you might have traded—plus macro liquidity fluctuations. If you only focus on historical gains and community hype when placing orders, without noticing declining on-chain activity or the diversion of users to other blockchains, you're likely heading for a liquidation.
How can you avoid this trap?
**First, define your boundaries.** Treat each trade as a "hypothesis test," not a belief that "I got it right." For example, if you're bullish on SOL, set specific observation indicators—such as ecosystem TVL changes, node counts, daily active wallets—and immediately reassess if the data deviates from expectations.
**Second, leave a safety margin.** Even if you're optimistic about a narrative (like the community effect of a Memecoin), you should reserve some price buffers for unexpected events. Strict stop-losses are not about giving up; they are a smart way to quantify the "unknown" into risk costs.
**Third, know your limitations.** The market is driven by a diverse range of participants, and you can never see everything. "I'll wait and act once clear signals emerge" may seem passive, but it's actually actively defining your capability zone to avoid reckless guesses.
So, true risk management boils down to four words: admit ignorance.