Take a close look at the evolution of Web3 over the past few years, and you'll notice a very glaring issue.
The asset layer is in place, smart contracts are in place, and various execution environments are available. But the most fundamental and easily overlooked aspect—the long-term preservation of data—has never been seriously addressed.
Most projects implicitly assume: data can be freely deleted, history can be compressed, and architectures can be torn down and rebuilt.
This logic is actually backwards.
The systems that truly survive are precisely those that cannot be torn down and rebuilt. Facebook's value isn't in its interface design, but in ten years of user interaction records. The value of gaming platforms isn't in engine optimization but in the accumulated characters, assets, and player stories. The same applies to powerful AI systems—not just the models themselves, but the behavioral data trajectories left during training.
This is the real barrier.
What Walrus aims to do is to turn "permanently preserved history" into a universal infrastructure.
Its approach isn't just simple file copying. The core is using erasure coding technology—breaking data objects into multiple fragments and generating redundant codes to disperse across network nodes.
What is the result of this?
You're not just storing 3 or 5 copies of data; you're constructing a mathematically recoverable structure. With current parameters, as long as 60% to 70% of the data fragments are available, the entire object can be fully reconstructed. This design fundamentally counters long-term uncertainty.
And long-term uncertainty is the daily reality of the Web3 world. Projects will die, teams will disperse, infrastructure will be updated, but data needs to survive. This is the problem Walrus wants to solve.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PanicSeller
· 01-10 05:44
Wow, someone finally mentioned this issue. Web3 is just a bunch of forgetful guys.
Historical data is the real moat, and Walrus's approach really hits the point.
View OriginalReply0
NFTRegretDiary
· 01-08 18:58
Oh no, someone finally exposed this issue. In Web3, many projects are only thinking about how to cut the leeks, and haven't considered that data needs to live forever.
Data persistence should have been prioritized long ago. Otherwise, the interaction records of today will be gone tomorrow, and what’s the point of an ecosystem barrier?
The idea behind Walrus's erasure coding is indeed powerful; with 60% distributed storage, recovery is possible. That’s the real protective net.
The reason Facebook and gaming platforms are valuable is not just because of their flashy UI, but because of the accumulated data. If Web3 keeps starting over, it will really be done.
No doubt about it, historical data is the ultimate moat. This time, the pain point has been truly addressed.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrybaby
· 01-08 18:50
Someone finally said it: Web3 is just a bunch of people with amnesia.
The issue of permanently storing data has indeed been seriously underestimated.
Erasure coding sounds very powerful; the 60% recoverability design idea is truly impressive.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentLossFan
· 01-08 18:46
Data permanence has indeed been seriously overlooked. Web3 is now just a bunch of short-termist products.
The idea of Walrus is good; erasure coding with distributed storage can indeed resist risks better than simple backups... but will anyone really pay for this?
A chain without data sedimentation is just an empty shell. This guy hit the nail on the head.
By the way, the analogy of Facebook's competitive barriers is a bit awkward; is the data from crypto projects really that valuable?
This is the correct way to build infrastructure. Unfortunately, most VCs are still playing the quick money game.
Long-term uncertainty = daily life. This really hits home... project teams aren't even thinking about surviving ten years.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropCollector
· 01-08 18:34
Damn, this angle is really awesome. Data is the true moat. We've all misunderstood the direction.
History records > smart contracts, this needs to be engraved on a monument.
Walrus's erasure coding design is impressive; just storing backups is like a little brother.
It's okay if the project dies; as long as the data lives forever.
Suddenly I understand why big companies are so valuable—they're basically data monopolies.
Wait, can 60%-70% be enough for restoration? This math is incredible.
Web3 lacks this kind of infrastructure for long-term thinking, but can Walrus survive until that day?
Haha, just discovered another overlooked track, but who will pay for permanent preservation?
Eternal data > eternal tokens. This is the narrative I want.
Take a close look at the evolution of Web3 over the past few years, and you'll notice a very glaring issue.
The asset layer is in place, smart contracts are in place, and various execution environments are available. But the most fundamental and easily overlooked aspect—the long-term preservation of data—has never been seriously addressed.
Most projects implicitly assume: data can be freely deleted, history can be compressed, and architectures can be torn down and rebuilt.
This logic is actually backwards.
The systems that truly survive are precisely those that cannot be torn down and rebuilt. Facebook's value isn't in its interface design, but in ten years of user interaction records. The value of gaming platforms isn't in engine optimization but in the accumulated characters, assets, and player stories. The same applies to powerful AI systems—not just the models themselves, but the behavioral data trajectories left during training.
This is the real barrier.
What Walrus aims to do is to turn "permanently preserved history" into a universal infrastructure.
Its approach isn't just simple file copying. The core is using erasure coding technology—breaking data objects into multiple fragments and generating redundant codes to disperse across network nodes.
What is the result of this?
You're not just storing 3 or 5 copies of data; you're constructing a mathematically recoverable structure. With current parameters, as long as 60% to 70% of the data fragments are available, the entire object can be fully reconstructed. This design fundamentally counters long-term uncertainty.
And long-term uncertainty is the daily reality of the Web3 world. Projects will die, teams will disperse, infrastructure will be updated, but data needs to survive. This is the problem Walrus wants to solve.